Hard Disk Performance: Everest 2.50 / HD Tach

We are utilizing the Everest Ultimate Edition 2.50 HDD drive benchmarks for this article. We are utilizing their Disk Read Benchmark to track overall read performance on our drives.

The WD1500 leads the other drives in the average read access, random reads, and linear read categories. The Samsung SP2504c makes a surprise showing in the linear read beginning, random read, and buffered read categories by outscoring the WD740GD.

The HD Tach read performance results are consistent with the Everest benchmarks and show the Samsung drive having the top burst rates along with better performance than the Maxtor drive.

Hard Disk Performance: iPEAK Hard Disk Performance: PCMark 2005
Comments Locked

51 Comments

View All Comments

  • Gary Key - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    Believe me, Purav cannot wait to start testing this drive in a RAID setup.
  • feraltoad - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    It would be great if you could include a comparison of the all 3 raptors in Raid 0. I have a 36gb Raptor and have often wondered if 2 in raid 0 would be as fast as 1 74gb raptor. Esp. now w/newer versions.
  • Rapsven - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    The content was very informative, and as a whole, the article was very well done. But jesus christ, dude, opening your articles with quotes ticks me off to no end.
  • rjm55 - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    Perhaps the quotes at the front of Gary's reviews will give you a repetoire that will include words that can be substituted for Dude. If you hate the quote just skip the first few sentences and you will not have to be bothered by the quotes.

    Personally I like them - the quotes set the reviews apart. It's sometimes nice to have a little education with my favorite hobby.
  • Gary Key - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    quote:

    The content was very informative, and as a whole, the article was very well done. But jesus christ, dude, opening your articles with quotes ticks me off to no end.


    Is it the quote itself or just the fact there is one? I would appreciate some honest feedback on the subject. I like the quote as it sets the tone for the article but I also realize it really is not needed. :-)
  • Rolphus - Thursday, February 9, 2006 - link

    I love the quotes. In particular, this one stuck in my mind, and provided an incredibly simple, single-sentence "hook" into the review which summed it up perfectly. I'd vote to keep them.
  • johnsonx - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    I like the quotes. It makes me think of Chairman Kaga on Iron Chef (the original Japanese show, not the new Iron Chef America).

    Seriously Gary, keep the quotes.
  • fb0252 - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    newbie q: the review uses the term "single user" recommending turning off native command queing in single user setting as opposed to multi user. i have a pair of wd1500s on my floor ready to be installed in our office system in Raid 0. One person at a time uses the computer but we frequently "multi-ask". do we turn of NCQ to get faster speeds in this sitaution--am I a "single user" on this computer, though much of our use is multi-asking--six programs at once e.g. doing multiple tasks.
  • Gary Key - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    Hi,
    I am assuming your applications will be general office and the machine is not being setup as a local server. If so, turn off NCQ. It it really meant at the server-level where you have highly random and concurrent requests. I would not go with RAID 0 for an office environment as you are playing with fire in regards to data reliability. Setup you system in RAID 10 if it supports it.

    Thanks....
  • Gary Key - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    We need an edit function. "Setup your system in RAID 10 if it supports it."

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now