Final Words
Overall, X3 Reunion looks like a decent game, but more importantly for our purposes, it looks to make a pretty good performance benchmark. The new graphics look is significantly better than the previous X2 graphics, thanks to a new engine. Whether or not this is your type of game, it looks very impressive, and with the latest graphics technology, including SM 3.0 support, it will definitely put your graphics card to the test.
At AnandTech, it is important for us to have a wide variety of games to test when looking at hardware performance, and games like these are always a welcome addition to our benchmarks. The X2: The Threat rolling demo was a benchmark that we routinely used for our card roundups in the past (before it became technologically out of date), and now, it will be replaced by the graphically superior X3 rolling demo. We will definitely be using this as a benchmark for future testing, as it represents the next generation of game graphics suitable for testing the higher-end cards and systems.
We've also seen how the processor speed factors in to the X3 benchmark. With graphics cards capable of moderately high framerates, you will get the best performance in X3 on a system with a good processor. Because of the CPU limitation, the X3 demo would make a good CPU benchmark as well as a graphics card benchmark, further adding to the usefulness of the game as part of our test suite.
It's refreshing to see the level of quality graphics for a game like this, especially given the scarcity of good space simulation games. While X3: Reunion might not be the best game of its type, it is definitely one of the best looking, and is a welcome addition to the genre.
Overall, X3 Reunion looks like a decent game, but more importantly for our purposes, it looks to make a pretty good performance benchmark. The new graphics look is significantly better than the previous X2 graphics, thanks to a new engine. Whether or not this is your type of game, it looks very impressive, and with the latest graphics technology, including SM 3.0 support, it will definitely put your graphics card to the test.
At AnandTech, it is important for us to have a wide variety of games to test when looking at hardware performance, and games like these are always a welcome addition to our benchmarks. The X2: The Threat rolling demo was a benchmark that we routinely used for our card roundups in the past (before it became technologically out of date), and now, it will be replaced by the graphically superior X3 rolling demo. We will definitely be using this as a benchmark for future testing, as it represents the next generation of game graphics suitable for testing the higher-end cards and systems.
We've also seen how the processor speed factors in to the X3 benchmark. With graphics cards capable of moderately high framerates, you will get the best performance in X3 on a system with a good processor. Because of the CPU limitation, the X3 demo would make a good CPU benchmark as well as a graphics card benchmark, further adding to the usefulness of the game as part of our test suite.
It's refreshing to see the level of quality graphics for a game like this, especially given the scarcity of good space simulation games. While X3: Reunion might not be the best game of its type, it is definitely one of the best looking, and is a welcome addition to the genre.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
34 Comments
View All Comments
Houdani - Wednesday, January 25, 2006 - link
And while you're at it, fill in the 12x10 graph with the rest of the cards which were omitted, rather than just benching the low end and high end cards (we in the middle would like to see how our cards fare). Much obliged.Lalakai - Wednesday, January 25, 2006 - link
I've been waiting for this game to come out for months, and now learn that during install process, a copy protection system may be installed (rootkit/starforce) on your system. I haven't been able to confirm this, and currently have that question posted to the company. I'm constantly making the kids made because i won't let 'em copy music cd's or games, and i support anti-piracy efforts, but to have a company try to hide software on my system...........regardless of how good the game is, i'll vote with my pocketbook and leave it on the shelf.DerekWilson - Wednesday, January 25, 2006 - link
AFAIK only the EU version of X3 employs StarForce.As much as I hate and dispise StarForce (it makes testing very difficult), it is not a rootkit. There has been much debate online about possible malicious uses for SF, but (unfortunately) none have been found.
Why is it unfortunate that no SF is not a rootkit? Because that would be the best and easiest way to fight it. I wish it were as bad a situation as the Sony DRM problem ... but people need to get as upset about having their fair use rights trampled on as they do about opening their system up to hackers if there is going to be anything done about StarForce.
Obviously our focus here at AT is hardware, but I'll get up on my soap box and yell about how DRM in general is a waste of time and money. Storage, memory, CPU cycles, and other resources are wasted on implimenting hardware and software that doesn't do anything to stop real pirates (those who copy and sell media or games for profit).
For online games checking cd keys against others online already is an effective means for keeping copying down without getting in the way of people who want to make copies of their media and wasting the resources of system on which the software is installed.
But that's as far as copy protection should go.
The answer is education. If companies dumped all the money they are wasting on DRM into educating the public about their own rights and making them feel good about being consumers, a whole lot more would get done.
Copiers, scanners, typewriters, printers, and pen and paper are every where ... how has the publishing industry survived for so long without copy protection?
The problem is the industry itself and the attiude of the public.
aka1nas - Wednesday, January 25, 2006 - link
Actually ALL versions of X3 currently being published employ starforce. Both the US CD and DVD versions use it as well as the Australian version.Lalakai - Wednesday, January 25, 2006 - link
easiest way to get message across is through market pressure. Gamers are constantly demanding better graphics, sound, and speed; this demand should also be linked to system privacy and individual rights. I have no qualms accepting anti-piracy protections and education. Protection shouldn't extend to installing specific protection software on the system, and if the programers feel this is their best option, then the response should be purchase of games and products that do not incorporate these means. As much as I enjoy X2 and have looked forward to X3, i'll likely let it slide and voice my opinion on every board that i participate in.DerekWilson - Wednesday, January 25, 2006 - link
X2 used StarForce as well ...And programmers don't usually decide what copy protection the publisher/distributor is going to use.
Lalakai - Wednesday, January 25, 2006 - link
lol just had to torment me didn't ya :~(guess i'm gonna have to be a little less trusting, and more investigative before using software. might be time to revisit EOC and Freelancer for awhile
............ummmm, now i gotta check and see if they also used StarForce.
thanks though for the info
alexhall50 - Wednesday, January 25, 2006 - link
StarForce is used to copy protect X3. If you look on the Egosoft forums then you will see that there have been a number of "conversations" on this topic. However the copy protection system used is not determined by the developer, rather it is determined by the Publisher. As such EgoSoft don't have much say on this. (At least that is my understanding).
regards
Alex
Phiro - Wednesday, January 25, 2006 - link
That I disagree with - that's the same thing as a hooker saying "sorry baby I can't do rodeo style because my pimp won't let me".Publishers do not MAKE the development company do anything - the development company signed the fucking contract with their eyes WIDE OPEN.
alexhall50 - Wednesday, January 25, 2006 - link
X3 does support SLI, however it does not (currently) support multi-monitor gaming (in the way X2 did) or widescreen support (although this will hopefully come in a patch).
I have a question on this benchmark review...
X3 has an option to automatically adjust the quality control of the game and some other graphics tweaks that are not explicitly mentioned within the review as to whether they were used.
So specifically was Auto Quality Control used within X3 for these benchmarks as this would help improve the scores of the less powerful cards?
I have an AMD64 3500XP+, 2GB RAM and a 7800GT graphics card. While my average framerate is around 30-35 (1280*1024, 4AA, 4AF, all settings high) I do notice extreme slowdown and jerkiness during the rolling demo.
regards
Alex