Black and White 2 Performance

Black and White 2 is a god sim with a very sophisticated graphics and physics engine. One thing very interesting about this game is the advanced in-game Anti-Aliasing option. While, only offering "low", "medium" and "high" AA settings, the game's AA looks surprisingly good, as we will show under the image quality section.

Here with Black and White 2, NVIDIA does quite a bit better than ATI. It would be an understatement to say that this game favors NVIDIA over ATI due to the before-mentioned problem ATI has with this game. Not only do the 1900s perform much lower than the GTX (without AA), but the performance actually becomes worse when Crossfire is enabled. Keep in mind though that ATI has promised a patch, and this issue will hopefully be resolved soon.

Also, Black and White 2 just happens to be possibly the most graphically intensive of our games in this review, so NVIDIA's parts struggle at high resolutions and with AA significantly. This game appears to put even the mighty 7800 GTX 512 sli setup to task, but we still see a playable framerate at the highest resolution with AA enabled. Note that we did not include maximum quality tests here because the in-game AA did a far greater job at image quality with not nearly the same drop in performance.

Black and White 2 - No AA

Black and White 2 - High AA



Battlefield 2 Performance Day of Defeat Performance
Comments Locked

120 Comments

View All Comments

  • Orbs - Wednesday, January 25, 2006 - link

    I didn't see any comparisons between X1900 XT CrossFire and X1900 XTX CrossFire, except for the comments at the end of the article saying diminishing returns resulting in even smaller a gap in CrossFire than the XTX had over the XT to begin with.

    With the exception of 1 B&W2 test (which I suspect is a typo), the graphs all show the X1800 XT vs. the X1900 XTX. Those are two different generations, not just clock speeds.
  • poohbear - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    I LOVE competition.:)
  • poohbear - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    especially GOOD competition.:0
  • Aquila76 - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    Nice. Maybe we'll start seeing some real developments in GPU's again. Right now, it's more of a 'do what we've been doing but faster', maybe we'll start seeing some new innovations in video tech in the coming year (adding physics processing, wider encoding capabilities, etc.).
  • Spoelie - Thursday, January 26, 2006 - link

    The x.00 line was more of the same yeah, but the x1.00 line is architecturally a pretty large step forward, finally on par with nvidia where it really needed to and a few steps ahead in other areas. If only they gave it more ROPs/Texture engines.
  • Phantronius - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    And the shitty cycle of upgrading continues.
  • Capt Caveman - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    And available at a good price. Way to go ATI.
  • gimpsoft - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    nice scores on ATI but i still have my 6800GT ill wait until next 2 gen i see we can now play respectable 40 frames + @ 19200X1400 nice to know when 1080p tv are out

    don't know either that or get a PS3 will see =) it's getting way to expensive.
  • bamacre - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    WTF is your idea of "good price?" I see X1900 XT starting at $550 to $605 per card.
  • Capt Caveman - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    Digitally Unique has the X1900XT for $525 and Actbuy had them for $504. Based on performance, these cards offer a great bang for your buck. And this is coming from a GTX 512 owner.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now