Presler vs. Smithfield - A Brief Look

Other than the larger L2 cache, Presler as incorporated in the Pentium Extreme Edition 955 provides us with two more enhancements over Smithfield: 1066MHz FSB support and a higher clock speed (3.46GHz).

We wanted to isolate the performance improvement due to the larger L2 cache aside from the other improvements to Presler, so we underclocked our sample and its FSB, and compared it to a Pentium D 820 (2.8GHz). 

Looking at a small subset of our tests, we can get a feel for where you can expect the largest performance gains due simply to the increase in L2 cache size.  Remember that since L2 access latency on Smithfield was already at 27 cycles, Presler's cache isn't any slower, so what we end up measuring is how large of an impact a 2MB cache has in some of our benchmarks. 

 Winstone   Business Winstone 2004  Multimedia Content Creation Winstone 2004
Presler 19.0 30.2
Smithfield 18.5 29.9

Under Business Winstone 2004, we see a boost of just under 3%, thanks to the larger cache size.  We have seen the biggest improvements in Winstone, thanks to lower latency caches and higher clock speeds, so it's not too much of a surprise to see a minimal impact here.  Content Creation Winstone 2004 shows no real performance impact either. 

 Media Encoding  3dsmax 7 Composite DVD Shrink WME9 H.264 iTunes
Presler 2.03 9.1m 31.3fps 10.5m 50s
Smithfield 2.05 8.9m 31.0fps 10.5m 50s

Our 3D rendering, video encoding and audio encoding tests basically all agree with the earlier results - the added cache doesn't really improve performance here, but that's to be expected, given the nature of the applications (and the already quite large 1MB L2 cache to which we are comparing). 

 Gaming   Battlefield 2  Call of Duty 2 Quake 4
Presler 77.3 76.2 130.6
Smithfield 73.0 75.6 125.5

It isn't until we look at some of our 3D gaming tests that we start to see some more tangible performance gains.  In games, there are some decent performance improvements to be had, ranging anywhere from 0 to just under 6%, thanks to the larger cache alone. 

Couple the larger cache with a faster FSB and higher clock speed, and the Pentium Extreme Edition 955 is shaping up to be a decent improvement over its predecessor. 

Larger L2, but no increase in latency? Multi-Core Support in Games?
Comments Locked

84 Comments

View All Comments

  • Betwon - Friday, December 30, 2005 - link

    edit:
    Why is it slower the latency of the memory? 101ns is much more than 5x ns. where is the 'on-die' communication? Your test program is wrong?
  • Viditor - Friday, December 30, 2005 - link

    Thanks Anand!

    I don't know if you'll have time, but one of the things lacking in all of the other reviews of the OC XE955 is a comparison to an OC X2 4800...
    Speculation is quite rife, and it would be a good comparison IMNSHO.

    Cheers!
  • Gigahertz19 - Friday, December 30, 2005 - link

    Intel's back...back again...backkkkkkk again..backkkkkkkk again...du dah duh da
  • yacoub - Tuesday, January 3, 2006 - link

    If by "back" you mean finally (barely) able to compete with existing AMD performance, then yes. ;P

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now