CPU Benchmark Performance: Simulation

Simulation and Science have a lot of overlap in the benchmarking world. The benchmarks that fall under Science have a distinct use for the data they output – in our Simulation section, these act more like synthetics but at some level are still trying to simulate a given environment.

In the encrypt/decrypt scenario, how data is transferred and by what mechanism is pertinent to on-the-fly encryption of sensitive data - a process by which more modern devices are leaning to for software security.

We are using DDR5 memory on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D and the other Ryzen 7000 series we've tested. This also includes Intel's 13th and 12th Gen processors. We tested the aforementioned platforms with the following settings:

  • DDR5-5600B CL46 - Intel 13th Gen
  • DDR5-5200 CL44 - Ryzen 7000
  • DDR5-4800 (B) CL40 - Intel 12th Gen

All other CPUs such as Ryzen 5000 and 3000 were tested at the relevant JEDEC settings as per the processor's individual memory support with DDR4.

Simulation

(3-1) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 65x65, 250 Yr

(3-1b) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 129x129, 550 Yr

(3-1c) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 257x257, 550 Yr

(3-2) Dolphin 5.0 Render Test

(3-3) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 10K Trains

(3-3b) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 10K Belts

(3-3c) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 20K Hybrid

(3-4) John The Ripper 1.9.0: Blowfish

(3-4b) John The Ripper 1.9.0: MD5

Looking at the results of our simulation-based tests, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D once again performs respectably across these tests. We would have expected higher performance in our Factorio benchmark, as the Ryzen 7 5800X3D and its 3D V-Cache did yield some impressive gains. This is likely due to the AMD PPM Provisioning and 3D V-Cache driver opting for frequency over cache when running this benchmark. That does show a little bit of a pitfall here for AMD.

CPU Benchmark Performance: Science CPU Benchmark Performance: Rendering And Encoding
Comments Locked

122 Comments

View All Comments

  • Hulk - Monday, February 27, 2023 - link

    10% average at 1440p. https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-9-7...

    That's over the 7950X. 5% over 13900K on average. And then slower in all applications.

    Nice cherry picking.

    But hey, if you need to get from 178fps to 205 that bad then go for it and lose speed everywhere else where you'll actually notice it. lol
  • Cooe - Wednesday, March 1, 2023 - link

    You are regularly GPU bound at 1440p you freaking dingus... 🤦 But the R9 7950X3D will be able to utilize more of a future high end GPU upgrade for a 1440p or 4K gaming rig than if you went with a slower gaming chip. Why? Because at 1440p and ESPECIALLY 4K IT HAS SIGNIFICANT LEFTOVER CPU HEADROOM! (This might be a hard concept for your peanut brain to grasp).

    If all you care about is high resolution gaming performance with current GPU's just get a i3-12100F and STFU while recognizing you'll likely need to replace it in when faster GPU's come out.

    CPU's are benchmarked for gaming at 1080p for a reason Mr. Tech Illiterate. 🤦 It's to remove GPU bottlenecking as much as possible so that you're ACTUALLY TESTING THE CPU vs your graphics card!
  • Gastec - Wednesday, March 1, 2023 - link

    A $5000 high-end GPU, mark my words!
  • Gastec - Wednesday, March 1, 2023 - link

    1080p (p from pitiful) FTW, until the end of time! What's that doomsdays clock sayin' nowadays, 2 nanoseconds to midnight, or what?
  • haukionkannel - Monday, February 27, 2023 - link

    Just like 5800x vs 5800x3d!
    So very impressive in gaming and less in productivity.
  • LonnieG - Monday, February 27, 2023 - link

    Look at the power consumption reduction. This is a real cost. Waste heat from the power supply, extra HVAC loads, more fan speed / noise. These factors are real and have a monetary value as well.
  • DanNeely - Monday, February 27, 2023 - link

    The X3D has significantly more hardware running in a lower power budget. As a result, max boost not withstanding I suspect that it's generally running at lower clock speeds than the conventional part.

    From an engineering standpoint I'd be interested in seeing what the comparison looks like with them forced to run at identical clocks.

    For more even real world results, can the X3D part have it's power level/clocks be increased to match where the non-3d part operates at? I know the 5800X3D had minimal overclockability, the rumor mill for the current generation has gone back and forth repeatedly; I'm unsure what the current/final status for it is.
  • Byte - Monday, February 27, 2023 - link

    The limit here is def the 3D cache and its 89C temp Tjmaxx
  • Targon - Tuesday, February 28, 2023 - link

    The X3D parts have a lower TDP rating, so yes, they run at a lower clock speed.
  • Dante Verizon - Monday, February 27, 2023 - link

    You should change the setting to prioritize caching on the problematic results so we have both data...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now