Miscellaneous Aspects and Concluding Remarks

Networking and storage are aspects that may be of vital importance in specific PC use-cases. The NUC 12 Pro kits come with the Wi-Fi 6E AX211 WLAN cards that also include Bluetooth 5.2 support. On the wired front, the vPro model has the I225-LM Ethernet controller, while the regular model has the I225-V controller with 2.5 Gbps support. Dual LAN options would be nice to have in the vPro SKU in order to enable a dedicated management network interface. Unfortunately, the NUC12WSKv7 has only one wired LAN interface.

On the storage side, the NUC 12 Pro kits do have support for PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSDs. However, cooling those within the space constraints imposed by the form-factor of the mainstream NUCs is very challenging. Even Intel's review sample came only with the Kingston KC2500 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe SSD. From a benchmarking perspective, we provide results from the WPCstorage test of SPECworkstation 3.1. This benchmark replays access traces from various programs used in different verticals and compares the score against the one obtained with a 2017 SanDisk 512GB SATA SSD in the SPECworkstation 3.1 reference system.

SPECworkstation 3.1.0 - WPCstorage SPEC Ratio Scores

The graphs above present results for different verticals, as grouped by SPECworkstation 3.1. The storage workload consists of 60 subtests. Access traces from CFD solvers and programs such as Catia, Creo, and Soidworks come under 'Product Development'. Storage access traces from the NAMD and LAMMPS molecular dynamics simulator are under the 'Life Sciences' category. 'General Operations' includes access traces from 7-Zip and Mozilla programs. The 'Energy' category replays traces from the energy-02 SPECviewperf workload. The 'Media and Entertainment' vertical includes Handbrake, Maya, and 3dsmax. It is no surprise to see the SSD score being the same in both the actively-cooled NUC 12 Pro kits. The Bleu Jour Meta 12 suffers from extreme thermal throttling, with the SSD temperature going as high as 80 C. So, it is no surprise to see the score for the SSD getting pulled low in that system.

Closing Thoughts

The introduction of hybrid processors to the UCFF line is a major marker in the history of the Intel NUCs. It is only fitting that the ten-year journey of the mainstream NUCs is punctuated by this event. The ultra-compact form-factor has evolved significantly over that time frame, and we find the systems being put to use in a wide range of deployments.

At the end of our review process for the three NUC 12 Pro Wall Street Canyon kits, we have good insights into the key knobs that control system performance. The PL1 and PL2 values are important for delivering the performance improvements expected when going from one generation to the next. At the same time, these numbers also impact the design of fanless systems. OEMs designing such industrial PCs need to pay extra attention to the tuning of the BIOS parameters to keep the temperatures in check.

Between the NUC12WSKi7 and NUC12WSKv7, it appears that the slightly higher turbo clocks in the latter do not deliver any tangible performance benefits. However, the vPro capabilities of the processor may be a must for specific deployments. Unless AMT is absolutely essential, the NUC12WSKi7 is as good a system as the NUC12WSKv7. Intel's new case design that was previewed in our NUC12WSKv7 sample is eye-catching and subjectively better than the current plain chassis. It might be worthwhile to investigate whether the case design for UCFF systems can also help improve the thermal profile.

I/O options in the NUC 12 Pro kits are excellent, given the form-factor of the system. The presence of two Thunderbolt 4 ports make up for the absence of a SDXC card slot and offers extensive expansion options. At the same time, the Lite SKU that removes the Thunderbolt 4 ports is also an attractive lower-priced option for industrial deployments that don't have a need for such high-speed I/O. The Bleu Jour Meta 12's use of the Lite board manages to convey that point.

Our performance evaluation showed that the NUC 12 Pro kits deliver tangible improvements over their Tiger Lake counterparts. Compared to the ASRock Industrial NUC BOX-1260P, the two actively-cooled kits have a much better power consumption and performance profile. Our doubts regarding the performance per watt metric for Alder Lake-P were laid to rest after our detailed investigation into the Wall Street Canyon NUC kits.

On the fanless front, the Bleu Jour Meta 12 is an interesting product that can only improve with more attention to BIOS tuning. The design itself could also do with some improvements in terms of SSD cooling support (the regular NUC 12 Pro kits have a better passive thermal solution for the storage subsystem compared to the Meta 12). Hopefully, the performance and temperature profile of the Meta 12 can change for the better before the product hits the market.

Supply chain issues have resulted in the Wall Street Canyon NUCs being offered in a wide range of prices. The official suggested price for the NUC12WSKi7 is $970 (inclusive of a 500GB NVMe SSD and 16GB of DDR4-3200 DRAM). However, equivalent configurations are being sold with a premium. End users are better off purchasing a barebones version for $660 and adding their own SSD and RAM. The NUC12WSKv7 has a recommended price of around $750 for the barebones version, but the only listing we could find has it for sale at $827. Fanless Alder Lake-P machines are yet to come to the market, though Akasa has announced a few DIY cases for the Wall Street Canyon NUCs. It remains to be seen whether Bleu Jour can eventually bring the Meta 12 to the market.

Power Consumption and Thermal Characteristics
Comments Locked

25 Comments

View All Comments

  • timecop1818 - Thursday, January 26, 2023 - link

    vPro is usually a price premium, as it allows fully remote management in corp environment.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Thursday, January 26, 2023 - link

    It's great to see the puck nuc come back, I was worried they discontinue it. Shame they gimped it with DDR4 SODIMMS when DDR5 is widely available, especially at this price.

    Guess I'll wait for 14th gen when they actually jump on new memory types.
  • meacupla - Thursday, January 26, 2023 - link

    Yeah, why would intel choose DDR4 on a platform like this? It makes zero sense.
    They had the option of DDR5SODIMM, DDR5CAMM, or LPDDR5, and they decide to go with DDR4SODIMM
  • abufrejoval - Sunday, January 29, 2023 - link

    I just checked, 64GB of SO-DIMMs is still twice the price at DDR5 than DDR4. And the performance difference might be very minor for CPU workloads, especially in this form factor.

    Now I would like to have seen if it makes a difference for the iGPU, but then the Xe isn't meant for gaming either way.

    LP variants require soldered RAM and that's one of the major advantages of this form factor: upgradable RAM. I run my NUCs as VM servers and 64GB is just a good fit for that. Try getting anything with 64GB of LPDDRx RAM!

    And then again at a reasonable price.
  • James5mith - Friday, January 27, 2023 - link

    I have an i7-1165G7 based NUC used for my pfsense firewall. It's overkill, but it has the 2x 2.5GbE NICs I wanted for my firewall upgrade.

    Idles extremely low power, and never really gets stressed. For 10-15w I have a 2.5GbE capable firewall that is never stressed even when using IDS/IPS.

    I wish they would release an i3 with 2x 2.5GbE at some point. It would be much more suited to the role.
  • Einy0 - Friday, January 27, 2023 - link

    The performance lag on the passive cooled version is a great example of how bad Intel's thermals have gotten. I used to put NUCs into passive cases half the size of the one used here, and they lost zero performance. It's really sad how far they've fallen.
  • Affectionate-Bed-980 - Friday, January 27, 2023 - link

    Are your specs for HDMI correct? I see HDMI 2.0 listed on some sites like Newegg but Intel's spec page says HDMI 2.1

    https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/s...
    https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/s...
  • PeachNCream - Friday, January 27, 2023 - link

    The problem with NUCs is that, after buying a screen, keyboard, and mouse, to get to a working system, you could have just purchased a laptop. NUCs don't offer mobility and aren't compelling from a performance perspective since they're using laptop-like TDP limits so you end up buying a desktop PC with laptop performance that you cannot use as flexibly as a laptop despite spending roughly the same amount. NUCs have niche uses, but the reason why they aren't popular is because that niche is rather narrow.
  • white-hot - Friday, January 27, 2023 - link

    I have been using them for years as HTPC's in various locations in my house. In general they have been fine up until recently when I began streaming high bit-rate 4K video and they really don't like it. Granted they are all i3's of several generations old now, but other than that they do fine. I have a home media server that delivers video to these units, but rather than upgrade for 4K use I am currently trying plex via a fire stick and/or smart TV. The video stream is better but the interface is so slow. Not sure where I will end up, but having a NUC velcroed to the back of a TV has been very nice up till now.
  • Hakaslak - Saturday, January 28, 2023 - link

    Does Quick Sync work for you? Maybe a newer NUC with hardware accelerated transcoding would be what you're looking for? The new ones have 2 multi-format codec engines and quick sync

    https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/s...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now