Z790 Chipset: More I/O Than Z690, But Same Performance

One of the main talking points surrounding all processor launches at present is platform affordability. When Intel launched its 12th Gen Alder Lake core series processors towards the tail end of 2021, it enabled users to utilize the higher bandwidth DDR5 memory in a desktop platform. As DDR5 memory supply was low and consumer demand was high during Alder Lake’s initial launch, this sky rocketed prices and it made it near impossible for users to buy a DDR5 kit to use with 12th Gen. Intel did offer support for both DDR5-4800 and DDR4-3200, but motherboards (600-series) could only support one or the other.

Although this hasn’t changed with Intel’s latest Z790 chipset, Intel does offer support for both DDR5 and DDR4 with its 13th Gen Raptor Lake Core processors; something AMD doesn’t do with Ryzen 7000 series, much to consumer’s angst. Even though Intel has opted for a higher DDR5 memory speed (5600 MT/s versus 4800 MT/s) compared to Alder Lake, DDR4 memory support remains at DDR4-3200.

Intel Z690, Z590, and Z490 Chipset Comparison
Feature Z790 Z690 Z590 Z490
Socket LGA1700 LGA1700 LGA1200 LGA1200
PCIe Lanes (CPU) 16 x 5.0
4 x 4.0
16 x 5.0
4 x 4.0
20 x 4.0 16 x 3.0
PCIe Lanes (Chipset) 20 x 4.0
8 x 3.0
12 x 4.0
16 x 3.0
24 x 3.0 24 x 3.0
PCIe Specification (CPU) 5.0/4.0 5.0/4.0 4.0 3.0
Memory Support DDR5-5600B
DDR4-3200
DDR5-4800B
DDR4-3200
DDR4-3200 DDR4-2933
PCIe Config x16
x8/x8
x8/x8/x4
x16
x8/x8
x8/x8/x4
x16
x8/x8
x8/x8/x4
x16
x8/x8
x8/x8+x4
DMI Lanes x8 4.0 x8 4.0 x8 3.0 x4 3.0
Max USB 3.2 (Gen2/Gen1) 10/10 10/10 6/10 6/10
USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20 Gbps) Y (5) Y (4) Y (4) ASMedia
Total USB 14 14 14 14
Max SATA Ports 8 8 6 6
Memory Channels (Dual) 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2
Intel Optane Memory Support N Y Y Y
Intel Rapid Storage Tech (RST) Y Y Y Y
Integrated Wi-Fi MAC Wi-Fi 6E Wi-Fi 6E Wi-Fi 6 Wi-Fi 6
Intel Smart Sound Y Y Y Y
Overclocking Support Y Y Y Y
Intel vPro N N N N
ME Firmware 16 16 15 14
TDP (W) 6 6 6 6

Looking at the Intel chipset comparison table above, one could really question what’s actually different about Z790 when compared directly to Z690, especially given that Z690 does allow full support for 13th Gen processors; yes, there is no hidden secret sauce or performance unlocking features, Z690 and Z790 will perform the same in compute and gaming.

The key differences are that Z790 offers an additional 8 x PCIe 4.0 lanes from the chipset, but at the cost of 8 x PCIe 3.0 lanes. This means Z790 still offers a total of 28 x PCI lanes when compared to Z690, but it gives vendors further flexibility to utilize the extra PCIe 4.0 lanes for high bandwidth M.2 slots and additional Thunderbolt 4 controllers, while still offering a few PCIe 3.0 lanes for devices such as additional NICs, streaming cards, and other non-bandwidth critical devices. 

Intel says Goodbye to Optane Memory (Cache), No Support on Z790

One thing to note with Z790 is that along with Intel’s decision to kill its Optane business; this chipset will NOT support Intel's Optane Memory, Intel's Optane-based drive caching solution. Using Z690 combined with 12th Gen should still yield the same level of support as before, but using Z790 will not allow Optane Memory to be used, which is understandable as Intel winds down its Optane and 3DXpoint storage division.

The main benefit for opting for Z790 over Z690 is essentially down to PCIe 4.0 I/O capabilities, with support for one more additional USB 3.2 G2x2 Type-C port compared to Z690. Having spoken to Intel directly about processor performance with either chipset, they made it clear that they do not expect compute or gaming performance to be any different regardless of whether you’re using the new Z790 or the existing Z690 chipset.

Raptor Lake In Detail: Raptor Cove P-Cores, More Efficiency Cores Test Bed and Setup: Updating Our Test Suite for 2023
POST A COMMENT

169 Comments

View All Comments

  • shabby - Thursday, October 20, 2022 - link

    http://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ce6075096ed8d9...

    Sometimes you need to go elsewhere to get what you need.
    Reply
  • shabby - Thursday, October 20, 2022 - link

    7700x uses 80w less during gaming than 13700k. Reply
  • CT007 - Sunday, October 23, 2022 - link

    7700X is an awesome chip for pure gaming... I don't understand why it has been excluded in so many major benchmarks I've scene lately. Reply
  • titaniumrock - Thursday, October 20, 2022 - link

    her is a link for you https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4Bm0Wr6OEQ Reply
  • m53 - Friday, October 21, 2022 - link

    For gaming: 13900k is more effecient than Ryzen per Igor’s lab’s test. Here’s what he has to say:

    “From a purely statistical point of view, it is a clear victory of the Core i9-13900K against the Ryzen 9 7950X in gaming, although life does not only consist of pure gaming. The Core i9-13900K often wins in the workstation and creation field, but not always. And even if it is even a tad more efficient at gaming than AMD’s Ryzen 9 7950X counterpart…”

    Link: https://www.igorslab.de/en/intel-core-i9-13900k-an...

    For idle: Given below is a comprehensive review for Alder Lake vs Zen3 done by Tech notice. He found Ryzen to use almost 4x during idle. He also tested some realistic day to day use cases where 12th gen was more efficient than Ryzen. I expect it to continue with 13th gen vs zen4.

    https://youtu.be/4F2z3F64o94
    Reply
  • t.s - Friday, October 21, 2022 - link

    Pity there's no from the wall numbers. Reply
  • Wrs - Friday, October 21, 2022 - link

    Socket power is a fair comparison - both sides have comparable socket PCIe lanes and chipset lanes. When using wall numbers for Intel vs. AMD you introduce motherboard and component variability. Even using the same CPU you'll find motherboards can vary by 10-20W at load due to VRM quality differences. Reply
  • t.s - Saturday, October 22, 2022 - link

    yep, you're right. I just curious about the consumption from the wall. Reply
  • catavalon21 - Sunday, October 23, 2022 - link

    CPU reviews used to. https://www.anandtech.com/bench/CPU-2020/2734 Reply
  • meacupla - Thursday, October 20, 2022 - link

    Intel is really pushing those e-cores. Do they really help with keeping power draw to a minimum while doing low power tasks? Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now