CPU Performance, Short Form

For our motherboard reviews, we use our short form testing method. These tests usually focus on if a motherboard is using MultiCore Turbo (the feature used to have maximum turbo on at all times, giving a frequency advantage), or if there are slight gains to be had from tweaking the firmware. We put the memory settings at the CPU manufacturers suggested frequency, making it very easy to see which motherboards have MCT enabled by default.

Rendering - Blender 2.79b: 3D Creation Suite - link

A high profile rendering tool, Blender is open-source allowing for massive amounts of configurability, and is used by a number of high-profile animation studios worldwide. The organization recently released a Blender benchmark package, a couple of weeks after we had narrowed our Blender test for our new suite, however their test can take over an hour. For our results, we run one of the sub-tests in that suite through the command line - a standard ‘bmw27’ scene in CPU only mode, and measure the time to complete the render.

Rendering: Blender 2.79b

Rendering – POV-Ray 3.7.1: Ray Tracing - link

The Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer, or POV-Ray, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 1-2 minutes on high-end platforms.

Rendering: POV-Ray 3.7.1 Benchmark

Compression – WinRAR 5.60b3: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30-second 720p videos.

Encoding: WinRAR 5.60b3

Synthetic – 7-Zip v1805: link

Out of our compression/decompression tool tests, 7-zip is the most requested and comes with a built-in benchmark. For our test suite, we’ve pulled the latest version of the software and we run the benchmark from the command line, reporting the compression, decompression, and a combined score.

It is noted in this benchmark that the latest multi-die processors have very bi-modal performance between compression and decompression, performing well in one and badly in the other. There are also discussions around how the Windows Scheduler is implementing every thread. As we get more results, it will be interesting to see how this plays out.

Encoding: 7-Zip 1805 CompressionEncoding: 7-Zip 1805 DecompressionEncoding: 7-Zip 1805 Combined

Point Calculations – 3D Movement Algorithm Test: link

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz, and IPC win in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores. For a brief explanation of the platform agnostic coding behind this benchmark, see my forum post here.

System: 3D Particle Movement v2.1

System Performance Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

39 Comments

View All Comments

  • meacupla - Saturday, October 23, 2021 - link

    You are either clueless or a total moron, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt of being the former.

    The CPU socket, RAM slots, m.2 slots, and pci-e slots do not add much to the BoM on mobos
    In fact, you can buy Intel LGA 115x and 2011 sockets off of Ali express for pennies.

    Soldering everything to the mobo adds to the complexity, which means, it will, in fact, be more costly to manufacture.
    Not only that, instead of having a single SKU for the mobo, you are now adding more SKUs for different configurations. This means you need more assembly lines building each of the SKUs, and are further increasing cost to manufacture.

    The only reason why apple is capable of soldering everything onto the board, is because
    1. They have a very small niche market, which is around 7.4% of the worldwide PC market share.
    2. Their very small niche market doesn't seem to care how their PC can't be upgraded or repaired.
    3. Their very small niche market doesn't seem to care how expensive Macs cost.

    Also, how the hell did you arrive at the conclusion, "Apple is cheaper, because they solder everything to the mobo"?
  • Wrs - Saturday, October 23, 2021 - link

    Sockets always add to product cost, but then so do multiple SKUs, in terms of inventory management. The added costs may be minimal when done well, but technically I don't see how soldering a chip directly to board can be higher BOM than soldering the socket and then inserting the same chip later. You are aware that sockets have to be soldered to board, right? :)

    And Apple ain't small. 7.4% share is still 20 million units each year, plus they share techniques & components with the miniature boards in another 150-200 million phones. Assembly line logistics & just-in-time manufacturing are kind of Apple's superpowers. Swapping one component for another of the same size on the same assembly line ought to be trivial.
  • meacupla - Saturday, October 23, 2021 - link

    Yeah, and then, when you have to do this exact same, multiple SKU thing for the Asrock X570 lineup, which consists of...
    X570 AQUA
    X570 Creator
    X570 Taichi Razer Edition
    X570 Taichi
    X570 Extreme4 Wifi ax
    X570 Extreme4
    X570 Pro4
    X570M Pro4
    X570 Steel Legend Wifi ax
    X570 Steel Legend
    X570 PG Velocita
    X570S PG Riptide
    X570 Phantom Gaming X
    X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Wifi ax
    X570 Phantom Gaming 4
    X570 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB3

    And combine most of those mobos with the Ryzen 5000 series lineup, which consists of...
    Ryzen 9 5950X
    Ryzen 9 5900X
    Ryzen 7 5800X
    Ryzen 5 5600X
    Ryzen 7 5700G
    Ryzen 5 5600G
    Ryzen 3 5300G

    Oh, and we can't forget RAM and SSDs, since those too will be soldered on in various configurations.
    So, for RAM we will do 8/16/32/64
    And for SSD, we will do 128/256/512/1TB/2TB

    16 x 7 x 4 x 5 = 2240 possible SKUs
    And this will be PURELY from Asrock's lineup. We haven't even done Asus, Gigabyte or MSI yet.
    It's pretty easy to see there is going to be a bit of an issue.
  • Qasar - Saturday, October 23, 2021 - link

    imagine this, but change it for intel. 2240 for amd ? i dont even want to consider this for intel. at the store i go to, there are 23 intel cpus ! just swapping cpus, while leaving everything else the same is 7,360 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    yea this would NOT work at all.
  • Wrs - Saturday, October 23, 2021 - link

    All that said I agree with your implied stance that we should keep major sockets on the desktop - RAM, CPU, GPU, storage - for the plain fact that the factories to solder/desolder the stuff are so far away, and we need a local ability to customize our stuff and upgrade/fix our components piecemeal.
  • Arbie - Saturday, October 23, 2021 - link

    "You are either clueless or a total moron"

    Do you pay extra, meaculpa, for being gratuitously insulting? Or maybe you think flame wars improve a forum, and would like to be treated that way yourself.
  • meacupla - Saturday, October 23, 2021 - link

    I aim to please.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Saturday, October 23, 2021 - link

    Well someone has to tell idiots they are idiots, otherwise they'll try to fly off of the empire state building thinking they've invented flight.
  • Oxford Guy - Saturday, October 23, 2021 - link

    1. Except for the employees (including people being paid to astroturf and such by their firms), all people who post here can automatically be characterized as not being geniuses. Geniuses typically have better things to do with their time and are able to recognize that.

    2. Among the group of less intelligent folk who do post here 'altruistically', each person has a different knowledge base and a different age. Expecting everyone to know everything is foolish. Some overreach in their posts but lack the knowledge to know that. That includes people who preen and pose whilst mocking others' efforts. When people make erroneous claims all that's needed is a simple factual correction, not a narcissistic display of bravura.

    Bottom line is this: Worry about yourself first. Worry about your factuality first. When correcting others, do it politely — especially when the people making the posts aren't being paid to do it. Correcting in a bullying manner is its own forum error, one deserving of correction.

    Culturally, it is clear that Internet discourse is becoming less civil. I have seen forums devolve, even those that don't have mechanisms (like downvoting and post hiding) that encourage the aggression that causes that devolution. I am not a sociologist so I don't know enough to be able to explain (with less guesswork and more facts) the origins of all of this trend but it is one that I can see clearly in many places — even though pockets of rudeness have always been around. Attention spans seem to be shrinking and with that there seems to be a proportionate rise in entitled smirky wrath.

    One thing humanity desperately needs is mandatory curriculum in all schools for understanding fallacies — how to avoid using them in discourse in particular. That would go a long way toward restoring some level of efficiency in public Internet-based communication. Even huge corporations use naked crass fallacies in court (as Sony did when trying to attack consumers who opposed the decision to retroactively strip the PS3 of Linux support).
  • haakon_k - Sunday, October 24, 2021 - link

    Post of the month! Nearly post of the year !! Well said, 'Oxford Guy'.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now