Board Features

The EVGA X570 Dark is an E-ATX motherboard designed for enthusiasts and extreme overclockers to maximize the performance of AMD's Ryzen 5000 series of processors. While the X570 Dark has many features associated with other premium X570S models recently launched, much of its feature set is geared towards extreme overclocking, including a transposed socket with two memory slots capable of supporting up to 64 GB of DDR4-4800 memory only.

EVGA includes three PCIe 4.0 slots, including two full-length slots operating at x16 and x8/x8, with a third half-length slot operating at x4. The EVGA X570 Dark also has plenty of storage options including two PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2 slots, and a combined total of eight SATA ports. Six of the SATA ports support RAID 0, 1, and 10 arrays which are driven by the chipset, and the other two are via a separate ASMedia ASM1061 SATA controller.

In the overclocking feature set is a voltage Probelt connector with cables supplied in the box, as well as an overclocker's toolkit consisting of PCIe dip switches, a Safeboot button, Clear CMOS button, and power button. For cooling, EVGA provides eight 4-pin headers with two designated to CPU fans, two for water pumps, and four for chassis fans.

EVGA X570 Dark E-ATX Motherboard
Warranty Period 3 Years
Product Page Link
Price $690
Size E-ATX
CPU Interface AM4
Chipset AMD X570
Memory Slots (DDR4) Two DDR4
Supporting 64 GB
Dual-Channel
Up to DDR4-4800
Video Outputs N/A
Network Connectivity 2 x Intel I225-V 2.5 GbE
Intel AX200 Wi-Fi 6
Onboard Audio Realtek ALC1220
EVGA NU SV3H615
PCIe Slots for Graphics (from CPU) 2 x PCIe 4.0 (x16, x8/x8)
PCIe Slots for Other (from PCH) 1 x PCIe 4.0 x4
Onboard SATA Six, RAID 0/1/10 (X570)
Two (ASMedia)
Onboard M.2 2 x PCIe 4.0 x4
USB 3.1 (10 Gbps) 4 x Type-A Rear Panel
1 x Type-C Rear Panel
1 x Type-C Header (1 x port)
USB 3.0 (5 Gbps) 2 x Type-A Rear Panel
2 x Type-A Header (4 x ports)
USB 2.0 1 x Type-A Header (2 x ports)
Power Connectors 1 x 24-pin ATX
2 x 8pin CPU
1 x 6pin GPU
Fan Headers 2 x CPU (4-pin)
2 x Water pump (4-pin)
4 x System (4-pin)
IO Panel 4 x USB 3.2 G2 Type-A
1 x USB 3.2 G2 Type-C
2 x USB 3.2 G2 Type-A
2 x Network RJ45 1 G (Intel)
5 x 3.5mm Audio Jacks (Realtek)
1 x S/PDIF Optical Output (Realtek)
2 x Intel AX200 Antenna Ports
1 x Clear CMOS Button
1 x PS/2 Combo Port

In terms of connectivity, EVGA includes one USB 3.2 G2 Type-C, four USB 3.2 G2 Type-A, and two USB 3.2 G1 Type-A on the rear panel. Other options in regards to USB include one USB 3.2 G2 Type-C header, two USB 3.2 G1 Type-A headers (four ports), and one USB 2.0 header (two ports). Other connectivity includes five 3.5 mm audio jacks and S/PDIF optical output which are powered by a Realtek ALC1220 HD audio codec and EVGA NU SV3H615 headphone amplifier pairing, while the board also includes a PS/2 combo port and a secondary clear CMOS button.

Focusing on networking support, EVGA includes two Intel I225-V 2.5 GbE controllers with two available ports on the rear panel. For wireless connectivity, EVGA is using an Intel AX200 Wi-Fi 6 wireless interface which also includes support for BT 5.2 devices.

Test Bed

As per our testing policy, we take a high-end CPU suitable for the motherboard released during the socket’s initial launch and equip the system with a suitable amount of memory running at the processor maximum supported frequency. This is also typically run at JEDEC subtimings where possible. It is noted that some users are not keen on this policy, stating that sometimes the maximum supported frequency is quite low, or faster memory is available at a similar price, or that the JEDEC speeds can be prohibitive for performance. While these comments make sense, ultimately very few users apply memory profiles (either XMP or other) as they require interaction with the BIOS. Most users will fall back on JEDEC supported speeds - this includes home users and industry who might want to shave off a cent or two from the cost or stay within the margins set by the manufacturer. Where possible, we will extend out testing to include faster memory modules either at the same time as the review or a later date.

Test Setup
Processor AMD Ryzen 3700X, 65W, $329 
8 Cores, 16 Threads, 3.6 GHz (4.4 GHz Turbo)
Motherboard EVGA X570 Dark
Cooling Cooler Master Masterliquid ML240 240 mm AIO
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower Grand 1200W Gold PSU
Memory 2x8GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 16-16-16-36 2T
Video Card ASUS GTX 980 STRIX (1178/1279 Boost)
Hard Drive Crucial MX300 1TB
Case Open Benchtable BC1.1 (Silver)
Operating System Windows 10 1909

Readers of our motherboard review section will have noted the trend in modern motherboards to implement a form of MultiCore Enhancement / Acceleration / Turbo (read our report here) on their motherboards. This does several things, including better benchmark results at stock settings (not entirely needed if overclocking is an end-user goal) at the expense of heat and temperature. It also gives, in essence, an automatic overclock which may be against what the user wants. Our testing methodology is ‘out-of-the-box’, with the latest public BIOS installed and XMP enabled, and thus subject to the whims of this feature. It is ultimately up to the motherboard manufacturer to take this risk – and manufacturers taking risks in the setup is something they do on every product (think C-state settings, USB priority, DPC Latency / monitoring priority, overriding memory sub-timings at JEDEC). Processor speed change is part of that risk, and ultimately if no overclocking is planned, some motherboards will affect how fast that shiny new processor goes and can be an important factor in the system build.

Hardware Providers for CPU and Motherboard Reviews
Sapphire RX 460 Nitro MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X OC Crucial MX200 +
MX500 SSDs
Corsair AX860i +
AX1200i PSUs
G.Skill RipjawsV,
SniperX, FlareX
Crucial Ballistix
DDR4
Silverstone
Coolers
Noctua
Coolers
BIOS And Software Stock System Performance
Comments Locked

36 Comments

View All Comments

  • Oxford Guy - Monday, October 11, 2021 - link

    What’s not is how MSI raised prices.
  • supdawgwtfd - Friday, October 8, 2021 - link

    "Touching on the performance with is almost certainly EVGA's primary focus here"

    Umm... What?

    Anandtech still doesn't have a basic proof reader person to check through articles before release it seems.
  • TheITS - Saturday, October 9, 2021 - link

    "As per our testing policy, we take a high-end CPU suitable for the motherboard released during the socket’s initial launch"

    Maybe your policies need updating so the reviews can be more useful to your customers. The 3700X was never a high end CPU anyway? Either Zen 2 and Zen 3 behave the same and you aren't invalidating your previous work by using a chip people will actually put in the thing, or they do behave differently in which case you just wasted all that time reviewing a product with a CPU no one will pair with it.
  • Oxford Guy - Saturday, October 9, 2021 - link

    'extreme overclocking'

    An anachronism.
  • LtGoonRush - Sunday, October 10, 2021 - link

    Wow, what a shameful display for a supposedly high-end, overclocking focused motherboard. That DPC latency is outright disqualifying, and the fact that they can't design a VRM without active cooling is just embarrassing. I really wanted to like this board and see a new entrant in the motherboard space, but this product absolutely should have been canceled before seeing the light of day. Along with their recent issues with exploding RTX 3000 cards it's starting to seem like EVGA is a brand to avoid.
  • Midland_Dog - Monday, October 11, 2021 - link

    still no memory overclocking segment, this review is as useless as the asrock z590 one
    no one cares what cpu frequency it does. a mediocre board will do the same cpu frequency, only reason you wont hit that frequency is because the board is so far away from decent that it shouldnt be sold

    MEMORY OC IS THE MAIN REASON THESE BOARDS HAVE ANY ADVANTAGE IN COMPETITIVE OC

    a great analogy for this review is that you are "seeing how much an F1 car can tow"

    every board thats worth owning will hit the same cpu frequency. for all we know b550 boards can score better than this because you havent tested memory OC. get yourselves a good kit of dual rank b-die and please test what its ACTUALLY made for. as far as im concerned this is a useless reviewq/

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now