Advanced Synthetic Tests

Our benchmark suite includes a variety of tests that are less about replicating any real-world IO patterns, and more about exposing the inner workings of a drive with narrowly-focused tests. Many of these tests will show exaggerated differences between drives, and for the most part that should not be taken as a sign that one drive will be drastically faster for real-world usage. These tests are about satisfying curiosity, and are not good measures of overall drive performance. For more details, please see the overview of our 2021 Consumer SSD Benchmark Suite.

Whole-Drive Fill

Pass 1
Pass 2

The ADATA XPG Gammix S50 Lite shows an almost QLC-like performance drop when the SLC cache runs out after about 300GB: it falls down to SATA speeds. But even though its post-cache write speed is half of what we're used to seeing from TLC drives (most of which use controllers with 8 channels rather than 4), the S50 Lite still has a big lead over the two QLC drives in this bunch.

On the second pass of filling the drive, the S50 Lite's SLC cache is good for only about 14GB and the post-cache performance is much less consistent, with frequent drops below 100MB/s and spikes back up to SLC speeds around 3GB/s.

Sustained 128kB Sequential Write (Power Efficiency)
Average Throughput for last 16 GB Overall Average Throughput

Working Set Size

The S50 Lite has excellent random read latency for smaller working sets, beating all but two of the drives in this bunch. But the consequences of having only 1GB of DRAM for a 2TB drive show up at the end of the test, where the random read performance falls off sharply once the reads span the entire drive rather than just a small slice.

Performance vs Block Size

Random Read
Random Write
Sequential Read
Sequential Write

The S50 Lite offers the same random read IOPS for all the IO block sizes from 512 bytes up to 4kB, but when testing random writes there's a clear preference for 4kB block sizes rather than anything smaller. Rather surprisingly, sequential reads with 4kB block sizes are far slower than for slightly smaller or larger block sizes; it would appear that the drive assumes 4kB reads will be random IO, and skips whatever caching or prefetching is active when using other block sizes.

Synthetic Tests: Basic IO Patterns Mixed IO Performance and Idle Power Management
Comments Locked

93 Comments

View All Comments

  • pSupaNova - Wednesday, May 5, 2021 - link

    I run that drive on an enclosure taped to a M1 Air, the thing draws so much power I had to buy a higher wattage charger than the one Apple supplies other wise the drive would not boot!

    The drive is now permanently writing Chia plots, should kill the drive in under a month.
  • Samus - Wednesday, May 5, 2021 - link

    Billy,

    I know this might be a niche demand, but is there any chance you could test some of these Gen4 drives on a PCIe 3.0 interface to see how MUCH of a difference the bus makes?

    Some of these PCIe 4.0 drives are so close to PCIe 3.0 you have to wonder if the interface even matters.
  • Linustechtips12#6900xt - Wednesday, May 5, 2021 - link

    greAT idea "see what I did there" tho please do Billy.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now