Fifth Place: NVIDIA NVTV

NVIDIA's NVTV launched alongside Media Center Edition 2005 as the first single-slot, dual tuner PCI card with MCE 2005 support.  Despite the fact that it is a NVIDIA branded TV tuner, it uses a pair of LSI DVXPLORE codecs.  These are the same codecs used on the eMuzed Maui board. However, given the large difference in image quality between the two boards, we'd say that NVIDIA's digital tuners are responsible for NVIDIA's 5th place showing in this comparison. 

The convenience of having two tuners on a single PCI card is outweighed by the fact that the NVTV produced the most grainy image out of any of the cards in this comparison.  The graininess was very detectable during normal viewing and it definitely impacted the experience. 

NVTV

Hauppauge WinTV PVR-250

The NVTV card also exhibited a noticeable amount of ghosting around the Headline news bar at the bottom of the screen, an effect that wasn't present on any of the other tuners.


Note the ghosting above the topmost yellow line

Our final complaint with the NVTV card was related to its displaying of text - there was a lot of noise in any text that appeared on the screen.  The text problem was actually one that's common to most of the TV tuners in this roundup, but the combination of that, the ghosting and the grainy picture assured NVIDIA's NVTV a last place showing in this roundup.


Note the artifacts over the letters "NCAA"

At $130 - $140 for a dual tuner card, the NVTV is fairly affordable, but considering the issues that we've had with it, we would not recommend it. 

The Platform Fourth Place: AVerMedia M150
Comments Locked

61 Comments

View All Comments

  • Tiorapatea - Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - link

    That all changed when Microsoft released Windows XP Media Center Edition. Bringing the first true 10-foot UI to the PC...

    Whilst I don't generally like to nitpick too much, I really do find the lack of attention given on this site to Linux solutions a bit puzzling. Linux really isn't all that hard to get going, particularly for enthusiasts. And Anandtech does aim, I believe, to cater for enthusiasts.
  • Tiorapatea - Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - link

  • trey007 - Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - link

    I have the ATI HDTV Wonder, but I haven't built nor bought a MCE PC because I'm waiting for more confirmation that it will work with my HDTV Card.

    Also, if I'm not mistaken, it comes with a standard TV Tuner as well, so this article confused me when it said I would need both.
  • Kishkumen - Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - link

    Something to keep in mind, if you have any thoughts at all of using MythTV at some point instead of MCE, you probably want to stay as far away from the ATI cards as possible. Hauppaugue cards have very good drivers, support and knowledge base for both MythTV and Linux in general. ATI TV cards... mmm... not so much... Then again, there are already HDTV based Linux cards with pretty good OTA and QAM capability fully supported under MythTV. You may not even need a crappy analog card. Although a PVR-150 will probably be useful for a while with those obscure analog holdouts on the far end of your cable listings.
  • ChiefNutz - Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - link

    Finally, Someone did a comparison review with several cards!!! I've been waiting for ever to see tests run against that ATI Elite & the Hauppauge / NVTV forever.. I do agree with #19 though... but i thought MCE 2005 doesn't support mpeg 4 anyways.. Thanks anadtech for fullfilling my wishes!!! yes
  • overclockingoodness - Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - link

    #24 (Cygni): I agree with your comments, but I disagree with your ideas behind AnandTech. AnandTech is a business, and a successful one at that. If I am not mistaken, AnandTech makes at least $1.2 million a year from ad revenue.

    And for Anand and his editors, this is a full time. It's not a hobby anymore. :)
  • BikeDude - Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - link

    So... Which one of these cards features Win64 drivers...?

    --
    Rune, soon to enter a TV-free reality...
  • Cygni - Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - link

    Im glad I get to battle through 30 "OMG U LEFT OUR PRODUCT X, THE WHOLE REVIEW = WORTHLESS" posts in every single AnandTech comments thread.

    A) The PVR-250 Retail is $140 on Newegg.

    B) The 150 ISNT IN STOCK at Newegg or Mwave, and has barely been on the market at all. Again, it takes time to write a review and do all the hours of testing required (especially when you realize that THIS IS A HOBBY to everyone who writes the articles). If the card isnt available, or has barely hit the market, how is AnandTech going to have it for a review started weeks ago unless somebody sends one?

    C) And ya... if it aint on Newegg, Mwave, or ZoomZipFly, i dont count it as a real price/availability. ;) Call me crazy, haha.

    Cant believe how much some people complain about a free website run by volunteers just trying to help people out...
  • BUBKA - Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - link

    Lets Go...

    ... Mountaineers!!!
  • Googer - Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - link

    One of nVIDIA's former Executives used to be a big wig engineer at LSI. Now can any one tell my why nVIDIA's solution is using LSI's silicon? Hmmmm....

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now