Intel Core i7-11700K Review: Blasting Off with Rocket Lake
by Dr. Ian Cutress on March 5, 2021 4:30 PM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
- Intel
- 14nm
- Xe-LP
- Rocket Lake
- Cypress Cove
- i7-11700K
Gaming Tests: F1 2019
The F1 racing games from Codemasters have been popular benchmarks in the tech community, mostly for ease-of-use and that they seem to take advantage of any area of a machine that might be better than another. The 2019 edition of the game features all 21 circuits on the calendar for that year, and includes a range of retro models and DLC focusing on the careers of Alain Prost and Ayrton Senna. Built on the EGO Engine 3.0, the game has been criticized similarly to most annual sports games, by not offering enough season-to-season graphical fidelity updates to make investing in the latest title worth it, however the 2019 edition revamps up the Career mode, with features such as in-season driver swaps coming into the mix. The quality of the graphics this time around is also superb, even at 4K low or 1080p Ultra.
For our test, we put Alex Albon in the Red Bull in position #20, for a dry two-lap race around Austin. We test at the following settings:
- 768p Ultra Low, 1440p Ultra Low, 4K Ultra Low, 1080p Ultra
In terms of automation, F1 2019 has an in-game benchmark that can be called from the command line, and the output file has frame times. We repeat each resolution setting for a minimum of 10 minutes, taking the averages and percentiles.
| AnandTech | Low Resolution Low Quality |
Medium Resolution Low Quality |
High Resolution Low Quality |
Medium Resolution Max Quality |
| Average FPS |  |
 |
 |
 |
| 95th Percentile |  |
 |
 |
 |
The Ego engine is usually a good bet where cores, IPC, and frequency matters. Despite this, the 11700K isn't showing much of a generational improvement.
All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
541 Comments
View All Comments
Makste - Saturday, March 6, 2021 - link
Well.. if it was for the click bait, hre we are 😁half_mexican - Friday, March 5, 2021 - link
This is from anandtech Dr. Ian Cutress"Latest beta BIOS from vendor, was told that they don't know when the next BIOS update will be and this contained everything to date. So unless you've got special information.
Note that this is always the risk of doing reviews even on launch day. At some point you have to lock in a BIOS version for published results. Vendors who send BIOSes 24 hours before embargo lift are told to go away."
terroradagio - Friday, March 5, 2021 - link
It has been well discussed that there is a forthcoming update coming. That is why the release and NDA is the way it is.Spunjji - Saturday, March 6, 2021 - link
I'm sure it will make a huuuuge difference. Especially for all the poor sods who bought Z490 in anticipation of a compatible upgrade. /sOtritus - Saturday, March 6, 2021 - link
I mean the leaks suggest that z590 motherboards having some problems resulting in performance regressions. So some poor sod who bought into z490 got to enjoy a fast cpu and can upgrade to an even faster one. AMD is obviously the best for non-avx-512 workloads, but where I am I can't find one for a reasonable price, so Intel is the only viable option. Perhaps the real travesty here is the lack of capacity in TSMC's 7nm node preventing us from buying excellent cpus and gpus at reasonable prices.Qasar - Saturday, March 6, 2021 - link
the question is, how many things actually use these special avx instructions ?? a handful ? unless you know you can use it, no point in them. seems intel creates these, just so it can win a benchmark.IanCutress - Friday, March 5, 2021 - link
People forget that Anand posted our Sandy Bridge review several months early.terroradagio - Friday, March 5, 2021 - link
So that makes this right? If I were Intel, I'd be revoking your early samples.Ryan Smith - Friday, March 5, 2021 - link
Yes, this makes this right.AnandTech has always honored NDAs, and continues to honor this one. We adhere to the requirements of every agreement we sign, even when doing so is not in our best financial interests. We do this because we're honest people, and just as pragmatically, we need hardware vendors to be able to trust us.
The flip side to that, however, is that retail hardware always has (and always will be) fair game. This was a processor sold by a major European retailer, tested in a motherboard based on a chipset that has been selling at retail for the past couple of months.
Although Intel may not be happy with that retailer over their lapse, at the end of the day this is final silicon running on final silicon. We have done every bit of due diligence both to ensure the accuracy of our results, and to inform the necessary parties in advance about what we intend to do, in case they wish to raise any issues with us.
So we stand by this review both from a technical perspective and an ethical perspective. All of this material was handled in a fair manner that was entirely above the board and legal in all steps of the process.
terroradagio - Friday, March 5, 2021 - link
Using a processor that isn't suppose to be sold is sketchy, plain and simple. And you know full well this. It is not to the benefit of anyone who may be interested in this part. You are thinking about yourselves, full tilt. And that is your choice. You have no idea what could happen with this update they are talking about. Will it be magic? Probably not. But will it have fixes for other things in your review? Perhaps. So therefore you are putting out an inaccurate piece for the purpose of getting out early that may very well be inaccurate in parts at the end of the month. And quite clearly from the comments here, feeding many hungry AMD fanboys.I'm not mad at you, just disappointed. Enjoy the attention.