Conclusion & End Remarks

Xiaomi’s flagship devices have always been quite interesting as alongside Samsung they’re always the first amongst a new generation of phones each release cycle. This means that at least from a technical standpoint, they have far fewer competition at this point in time before other vendors catch up with their release in the coming months. The Mi 11 is a real step-up for Xiaomi as it combines a few key changes that do differentiate it quite a lot to last year’s Mi 10 series.

The design of the Mi 11 – at least from the front of the phone, is rather iterative over the Mi 10, however with a few changes such as the now flowing frame edges and the front glass panel that is now also slightly curved at the top and bottom of the phone. Xiaomi has been able to reduce the weight and thickness of the phone which in my view is a general positive to the ergonomics of the phone.

The big new upgrade of this generation has been the display. A new 1440p 120Hz panel really augments the device from previous generation iterations and in terms of picture quality it’s absolutely a phone that competes with the best of that’s currently available in the market.

The one aspect where the display doesn’t keep up is in terms of its under-the-hood technology. It doesn’t feature any VRR – either software or hardware, and this means that the power consumption at 120Hz is quite bad.

Edit March 12th: The Mi 11 does have a coarse software-based refresh rate switching mechanism, however it does not function below 110 nits screen brightness (around 70% on the brightness slider). 

On top of that, the phone seems to suffer from quite high base power consumption even at 60Hz, well beyond that of other phones, and this results in less than expected battery life for the device. It’s not unusable, but it’s definitely not competitive with other same-class devices in the market.

Performance of the Mi 11 is fantastic thanks to the Snapdragon 888. As of right now, it very much could be said that it’s the fastest Android device in the market, due to how Xiaomi is being more aggressive with the thermal envelope of the phone, compared to Samsung. There’s still doubts about the generational gaming performance improvements here, as it still cannot fully harness the new Snapdragon’s full performance for prolonged periods, but it’s likely the best we’re going to see for 2021 Android phones.

The camera performance of the Mi 11 is quite strong. In daylight, the camera’s ability to capture in 27MP mode means that it results in pictures that are of higher detail than anything the competition is able to offer, although dynamic range doesn’t quite go as far. Xiaomi has also a much more natural look to its details, and aren’t as over-sharpened or processed as other competitors’ results. Generationally, Xiaomi has also improved its colour temperature processing which in my view is one of the biggest changes over the Mi 10 series, and that’s a bigger positive.

In terms of telephoto – because the device doesn’t have a dedicated module, you’d think that it doesn’t do as well in this aspect of photography. That’s actually not quite correct, as Xiaomi is able to take advantage of the 108MP main sensor’s sheer resolution at higher magnifications. Even at a 2x magnification, the Mi 11 tends to do better than other devices in the market. Of course, it can’t compete against periscope implementations at far longer focal lengths.

In low-light, the Mi 11 is an adequate performer and above-average, though there are competitors which do better. Particularly the ultra-wide angle is lagging behind the superior hardware of some of the competition.

A winner at 749€, though availability is scarce

The most attractive aspect of the Mi 11 is its price. Starting at 749€ MSRP, the phone offers a very compelling package that I think rationalises itself against the nearest competition. The nearest competition of course is the Galaxy S21+ which lands in at 849€ at the time of writing. The Xiaomi has a higher quality screen, generally better main camera module (though worse ultra-wide), a more premium design and build, a faster SoC (In Exynos markets), however it’s likely to have notable worse battery life.

For our readers in the US of course, the phone won’t be officially available at all unless you somehow get an imported unit, so it’s not really a viable option for consideration.

What’s actually more of an issue is the availability of the phone in other western markets. At the time of writing the Mi 11 isn’t readily available yet in Europe, so while we’ve reviewed the phone and deemed it good, it’s still very hard to get one. If that situation changes in the coming weeks, then the Mi 11 should be a strong contender.

Camera - Low Light Evaluation
Comments Locked

85 Comments

View All Comments

  • asmian - Thursday, March 11, 2021 - link

    What rubbish. I don't know why you're determined to attack me, rather than the original poster. I'm in no glass house, and no hypocrite, because I'm not going around attacking others based just on their nationality. Nor am I myopic to systemic faults, but calling a Tory government "fascist" (as you said elsewhere) is just leftist name-calling, not helpful politics. And it's patently untrue and ridiculous hyperbole when there are real fascist governments oppressing women actively in eastern Europe right now, within the EU.

    When someone calls an entire country "Nazis" then that can't go unchallenged. It's no hypocrisy to point out that making comments about an entire modern country based on the past actions of individuals, or the state (in a "democracy" that was able to be voted for by substantially less than half of the population at the time), is offensive. I wasn't defending those actions, so there was no "worthless defence". I just don't subscribe to the popular PC theory that every current citizen should feel guilty for actions in the past they weren't responsible for, which you obviously do, since you're so angry about it. And I know quite enough NOT to be lectured by some random internet knowitall who does nothing but troll every thread here as if it's their private blog.
  • Martin84a - Thursday, March 11, 2021 - link

    Just a small observation. On one hand you say "hey, don't judge Britons based on the actions of our ancestors", but at the same time you say "hey, our ancestors fought the real fascist in World War 2." If you don't feel shame based on your ancestors actions, you shouldn't feel pride either. It's not like you took part in their actions.

    You can't have it both way mate. If you aren't connected to what someone in the past did, then you should feel shame for what they did. But you shouldn't feel the need to
  • hbsource - Wednesday, March 10, 2021 - link

    Not sure Americans should be throwing insults around about killing Indians.
  • Wereweeb - Wednesday, March 10, 2021 - link

    I'm not american
  • BedfordTim - Wednesday, March 10, 2021 - link

    Assuming you are talking about the Bengal famine, you seem to have forgotten about the assorted natural disasters that just happened to occur at the same time, the bombing of Calcutta which disrupted the rice market, and the loss of imports from Burma. Deaths through famine and misadministration do not equate to deaths in concentration camps.
  • quorm - Wednesday, March 10, 2021 - link

    I apologize for contributing to the derail.

    You're seriously saying that they are responsible for the deaths of millions, but because of the manner in which they died, its not so bad? Pretty sure the victims wouldn't feel the same way.
  • RSAUser - Thursday, March 11, 2021 - link

    Pretty sure he just said you can't say they're directly responsible for it.
  • Spunjji - Thursday, March 11, 2021 - link

    They sure do look similar when the man in charge at the time saw those deaths as a moral good. Oh no, those "beastly people with a beastly religion" are dying, how sad, better keep forcibly expropriating the goods they need to survive.

    Nobody's "forgetting" any of what you mentioned, it's just not particularly relevant to discussion. It's like saying that Stalin didn't kill most of the dissidents who died under his regime, he just sent them off to places where they died from exposure and starvation. Go Stalin!
  • Spunjji - Thursday, March 11, 2021 - link

    There are plenty of neo-Nazis here, and every single one of them voted Brexit. Not everyone who voted Brexit was a neo-Nazi, of course - they just voted for a magical unicorn *alongside* the neo-Nazis, spurred on by far-right voices in the popular press.
  • hbsource - Thursday, March 11, 2021 - link

    Bear in mind that I say this as someone who voted remain. If you blame 'the popular press' for Brexit then you misunderstand British politics.

    You have got it the opposite way around to reality. Which is a big reason why the left in this country has not won a general election since 2005.

    People do buy The Sun and then decide to vote for right wing parties. The Sun pitches itself to right wing voters in order to sell newspapers.

    If you think that without the right wing press then everyone would vote Labour, get ready for more decades without a left of centre government.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now