Camera - HDR

While telephoto is interesting, on a phone like this what’s most important is the quality of the main camera at its native 1x modes, as well as the ultra-wide module. HDR processing this generation should have changed given that we’re using a new SoC with a new ISP, with possibly different algorithms.

Click for full image
[ Mi 11 [ Mi 10 Pro ]
[ S21U(S) ] [ S21U(E) ]
[ S21(E) ] [ S20+(E) ] [ Note20U(S) ]
[ iPhone 12 Pro ] [ Mate40 Pro ] [ Pixel 5 ]
[ X-T30 ( ) ]

In this demanding scene, we’re seeing that the new optics on the Mi 11 fare much better than on the Mi 10 Pro, producing apparently less optical flares in the sun and also producing more contrast than the predecessor.

It’s also immediately visible that the Mi 11 is able to produce a more natural colour temperature compared to the Mi 11, this applies to the main sensor as well as the ultra-wide module. What I don’t think is as great is the details in the shadows, where the Mi 11 more notably clips details to black.

In terms of dynamic range, the Mi 11 does well, but it’s noticeable that it falls behind the competition with less details in the highlights and shadows.

Click for full image
[ Mi 11 [ Mi 10 Pro ]
[ S21U(S) ] [ S21U(E) ]
[ S21(E) ] [ S20+(E) ] [ Note20U(S) ]
[ iPhone 12 Pro ] [ Mate40 Pro ] [ Pixel 5 ]
[ X-T30 ( ) ]

In this scene, we again see the Mi 11 produce a better colour temperature than the Mi 10 Pro, and the phone also has better dynamic range versus its predecessor, but again lags behind the competition when it comes to pure HDR detail recovery in the highlights and shadows.

Click for full image
[ Mi 11 [ Mi 10 Pro ]
[ S21U(S) ] [ S21U(E) ]
[ S21(E) ] [ S20+(E) ][ Note20U(S) ]
[ Mate40 Pro ] [ Pixel 5 ]
[ X-T30 (  ) ]

Next up, the most visible generational improvement is again the colour temperature which is more accurate with the Mi 11 now.

This is also a good scene to talk about the detail capture of the Mi 11. The Xiaomi devices are the only phones which actually capture auto-shots at 27MP resolution, and in that sense, are actually far superior to all other devices in the market right now which capture at 12MP, especially against those which also employ artificial detail sharpening.

Click for full image
[ Mi 11 [ Mi 10 Pro ]
[ S21U(S) ] [ S21U(E) ]
[ S21(E) ] [ S20+(E) ] [ Note20U(S) ]
[ iPhone 12 Pro ] [ Mate40 Pro ] [ Pixel 5 ]
[ X-T30 (  ) ]

In less demanding HDR shots like here, the Mi 11 again shows minute improvements over the Mi 10 Pro, I notice the colour temperature again being much better, and there’s also slight improvements in the shadows.

The 27MP picture gets a tremendous amount of natural detail – the S21 Ultra appears to be sharper at first glance but comparing the textures 1:1 to the Mi 11 and the Fuji results showcase that it’s more of a detail enhancement in post-processing.

Click for full image
[ Mi 11 [ Mi 10 Pro ]
[ S21U(S) ] [ S21U(E) ]
[ S21(E) ] [ S20+(E) ] [ Note20U(S) ]
[ iPhone 12 Pro ] [ Mate40 Pro ] [ Pixel 5 ]
[ X-T30 (  ) ]

The ultra-wide on the Mi 11, although not as strong in the dynamic range as the S21 series, is able to produce a much more natural rendition of the details, although we do see not so strong optics as there are quite a lot of chromatic aberrations and fringing happening towards the edges of the frame.

Click for full image
[ Mi 11 [ Mi 10 Pro ]
[ S21U(S) ] [ S21U(E) ]
[ S21(E) ] [ S20+(E) ] [ Note20U(S) ]
[ iPhone 12 Pro ] [ Mate40 Pro ] [ Pixel 5 ]
[ X-T30 (  ) ]

This shot had an extremely stark difference between the Mi 11 and the Mi 10, where the new phone blows the old out of the water in terms of the end-result – at least on the main camera as the ultra-wide isn’t that different.

Although the shadow retention isn’t the best amongst the phones, the highlights and overall metering on the Mi 11 was amongst the best of all phones in my view.

Click for full image
[ Mi 11 [ Mi 10 Pro ]
[ S21U(S) ] [ S21U(E) ]
[ S21(E) ] [ S20+(E) ] [ Note20U(S) ]
[ iPhone 12 Pro ] [ Mate40 Pro ] [ Pixel 5 ]
[ X-T30 ( ) ]

The next shot on the main camera also what pops out is the better colour temperature of the Mi 11 compared to its predecessor. Details are strong and natural throughout the frame, lacking any of the post-processing we see on other phones. 

Click for full image
[ Mi 11 [ Mi 10 Pro ]
[ S21U(S) ] [ S21U(E) ]
[ S21(E) ] [ S20+(E) ] [ Note20U(S) ]
[ iPhone 12 Pro ] [ Mate40 Pro ] [ Pixel 5 ]
[ X-T30 ( ) ]

When it comes to quite flat scenarios with little dynamic range, the Mi 11 really shines in terms of resolution as it differentiates itself with its 27MP default mode, and here it just captures way more information than any other phone.

Overall Daylight Verdict: Very Competent

The Xiaomi Mi 11 doesn’t have a very fancy camera setup in that its main module and the ultra-wide have to carry the phone through all everyday scenarios. Although it’s a simple solution, it also does it quite well and consistently, even though it might not reach as far as some competing devices.

What I found to be quite good for this generation was just the overall better colour temperature rendition of the Mi 11 which popped up to me as the most evident change compared to the Mi 10 Pro, which is extremely welcome.

HDR this generation has also improved, although there are competitor devices which can do better – but the Mi 11 is a top-performing contender still.

What really differentiates the Mi 11 and Xiaomi’s phones in general compared to the competition is the fact that the main camera is just much higher resolution than the competition. The 2x2 binning of the 108MP sensor results in 27MP auto images. While these are not pixel-perfect, they are just far superior to that of any other phone’s 12MP shots, particularly against devices which have more artificial sharpening and structure enhancements in post-processing.

Overall I think the Mi 11 is an extremely capable day-light shooter, and fits well within the price-range of the device.

Camera - Zoom with no Telephoto Camera - Low Light Evaluation
Comments Locked

85 Comments

View All Comments

  • asmian - Thursday, March 11, 2021 - link

    What rubbish. I don't know why you're determined to attack me, rather than the original poster. I'm in no glass house, and no hypocrite, because I'm not going around attacking others based just on their nationality. Nor am I myopic to systemic faults, but calling a Tory government "fascist" (as you said elsewhere) is just leftist name-calling, not helpful politics. And it's patently untrue and ridiculous hyperbole when there are real fascist governments oppressing women actively in eastern Europe right now, within the EU.

    When someone calls an entire country "Nazis" then that can't go unchallenged. It's no hypocrisy to point out that making comments about an entire modern country based on the past actions of individuals, or the state (in a "democracy" that was able to be voted for by substantially less than half of the population at the time), is offensive. I wasn't defending those actions, so there was no "worthless defence". I just don't subscribe to the popular PC theory that every current citizen should feel guilty for actions in the past they weren't responsible for, which you obviously do, since you're so angry about it. And I know quite enough NOT to be lectured by some random internet knowitall who does nothing but troll every thread here as if it's their private blog.
  • Martin84a - Thursday, March 11, 2021 - link

    Just a small observation. On one hand you say "hey, don't judge Britons based on the actions of our ancestors", but at the same time you say "hey, our ancestors fought the real fascist in World War 2." If you don't feel shame based on your ancestors actions, you shouldn't feel pride either. It's not like you took part in their actions.

    You can't have it both way mate. If you aren't connected to what someone in the past did, then you should feel shame for what they did. But you shouldn't feel the need to
  • hbsource - Wednesday, March 10, 2021 - link

    Not sure Americans should be throwing insults around about killing Indians.
  • Wereweeb - Wednesday, March 10, 2021 - link

    I'm not american
  • BedfordTim - Wednesday, March 10, 2021 - link

    Assuming you are talking about the Bengal famine, you seem to have forgotten about the assorted natural disasters that just happened to occur at the same time, the bombing of Calcutta which disrupted the rice market, and the loss of imports from Burma. Deaths through famine and misadministration do not equate to deaths in concentration camps.
  • quorm - Wednesday, March 10, 2021 - link

    I apologize for contributing to the derail.

    You're seriously saying that they are responsible for the deaths of millions, but because of the manner in which they died, its not so bad? Pretty sure the victims wouldn't feel the same way.
  • RSAUser - Thursday, March 11, 2021 - link

    Pretty sure he just said you can't say they're directly responsible for it.
  • Spunjji - Thursday, March 11, 2021 - link

    They sure do look similar when the man in charge at the time saw those deaths as a moral good. Oh no, those "beastly people with a beastly religion" are dying, how sad, better keep forcibly expropriating the goods they need to survive.

    Nobody's "forgetting" any of what you mentioned, it's just not particularly relevant to discussion. It's like saying that Stalin didn't kill most of the dissidents who died under his regime, he just sent them off to places where they died from exposure and starvation. Go Stalin!
  • Spunjji - Thursday, March 11, 2021 - link

    There are plenty of neo-Nazis here, and every single one of them voted Brexit. Not everyone who voted Brexit was a neo-Nazi, of course - they just voted for a magical unicorn *alongside* the neo-Nazis, spurred on by far-right voices in the popular press.
  • hbsource - Thursday, March 11, 2021 - link

    Bear in mind that I say this as someone who voted remain. If you blame 'the popular press' for Brexit then you misunderstand British politics.

    You have got it the opposite way around to reality. Which is a big reason why the left in this country has not won a general election since 2005.

    People do buy The Sun and then decide to vote for right wing parties. The Sun pitches itself to right wing voters in order to sell newspapers.

    If you think that without the right wing press then everyone would vote Labour, get ready for more decades without a left of centre government.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now