Gaming Tests: Far Cry 5

The fifth title in Ubisoft's Far Cry series lands us right into the unwelcoming arms of an armed militant cult in Montana, one of the many middles-of-nowhere in the United States. With a charismatic and enigmatic adversary, gorgeous landscapes of the northwestern American flavor, and lots of violence, it is classic Far Cry fare. Graphically intensive in an open-world environment, the game mixes in action and exploration with a lot of configurability.

Unfortunately, the game doesn’t like us changing the resolution in the results file when using certain monitors, resorting to 1080p but keeping the quality settings. But resolution scaling does work, so we decided to fix the resolution at 1080p and use a variety of different scaling factors to give the following:

  • 720p Low, 1440p Low, 4K Low, 1440p Max.

Far Cry 5 outputs a results file here, but that the file is a HTML file, which showcases a graph of the FPS detected. At no point in the HTML file does it contain the frame times for each frame, but it does show the frames per second, as a value once per second in the graph. The graph in HTML form is a series of (x,y) co-ordinates scaled to the min/max of the graph, rather than the raw (second, FPS) data, and so using regex I carefully tease out the values of the graph, convert them into a (second, FPS) format, and take our values of averages and percentiles that way.

If anyone from Ubisoft wants to chat about building a benchmark platform that would not only help me but also every other member of the tech press build our benchmark testing platform to help our readers decide what is the best hardware to use on your games, please reach out to ian@anandtech.com. Some of the suggestions I want to give you will take less than half a day and it’s easily free advertising to use the benchmark over the next couple of years (or more).

As with the other gaming tests, we run each resolution/setting combination for a minimum of 10 minutes and take the relevant frame data for averages and percentiles.

AnandTech Low Resolution
Low Quality
Medium Resolution
Low Quality
High Resolution
Low Quality
Medium Resolution
Max Quality
Average FPS
95th Percentile

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

Gaming Tests: F1 2019 Gaming Tests: Gears Tactics
Comments Locked

339 Comments

View All Comments

  • Andrew LB - Sunday, December 13, 2020 - link

    5800x @ 3.6-4.7ghz draws 219w and hits 82'c and locked at 4.7ghz its 231w and 88'c.

    Thats hotter than my i7-10700k @ 5.1ghz all core locked.

    https://www.kitguru.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/11...
  • Thunder 57 - Monday, April 26, 2021 - link

    This comment didn't age well...
  • AndyMclamb - Tuesday, September 28, 2021 - link

    Rip AMD oner year later Intel destroys AMD with Alder Lake
  • jeremyshaw - Thursday, November 5, 2020 - link

    Yes! All I wanted to see was on the Cache and Latency parts - the unified cache allows 6 core and 12 core setups without the penalties of having partial CCXs!
  • JfromImaginstuff - Thursday, November 5, 2020 - link

    Wow, just wow,
    Intel, hang in there you'll get there eventually
  • PandaBear - Friday, November 6, 2020 - link

    In 2023 maybe.
  • Spunjji - Monday, November 9, 2020 - link

    It could be as soon as 2022 that they become properly competitive on power and performance, depending on how TSMC 5nm and Zen 4 shake out for AMD.

    Rocket Lake ought to at least given them presence in mid-range gaming, if you can stomach the power...
  • 5j3rul3 - Thursday, November 5, 2020 - link

    No Microsoft Filght Simulator 2020 Test?
  • 5j3rul3 - Thursday, November 5, 2020 - link

    MFS 2020 is the great to test CPU performance in game
  • gagegfg - Thursday, November 5, 2020 - link

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/16214/amd-zen-3-ryz...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now