Gaming Performance

The Pentium M offers reasonably strong gaming performance, more competitive than the Pentium 4, but at such a low clock speed, and more importantly, without the memory bandwidth to back it up - the Pentium M isn't as solid of a performer as it could be here.

Doom 3

Doom 3

Halo

Halo 1.05

Unreal Tournament 2004

Unreal Tournament 2004

Wolfenstein: ET

Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory

Audio/Video Encoding 3D Rendering
Comments Locked

77 Comments

View All Comments

  • CSMR - Monday, February 7, 2005 - link

    The fact is it's an excellent processor for business use (speed, quietness, reliability) and multimedia use (quietness). Anandtech is full of gamers; but there is no denying that using a computer as a media centre is becoming a big thing, or that low-power, quiet operation is necessary. High motherboard prices are because the desktop PM motherboard market is very small. There was a comment in the review that the PM architecture doesn't scale well. I am sure that is so; but what processors do scale well? It's because they don't that everyone is about to go dual-core.
  • bobsmith1492 - Monday, February 7, 2005 - link

    Thanks #12 :P
  • Zebo - Monday, February 7, 2005 - link

    I myself have been guilty of hyping dothan after seeing GAMEPCs "opimistic" review. This should quell that.:D
  • Zebo - Monday, February 7, 2005 - link

    Anand best review I've read here, thanks a lot, nice to see you scribing again..:)

    Seems again, like the tech report review, with a comprehensive test suite such as this one dothan has some collosal performance flaws, and simply can't match up the A64 across board. It looses 30 out of 41 benches at same speed, some huge. 2.0 vs 2.0..

    I posted in CPU forum how turion/lancaster will be 25W.. could this be the end of DOTHANS laptop dominace?
  • Brian23 - Monday, February 7, 2005 - link

    I agree with #10.
  • bobsmith1492 - Monday, February 7, 2005 - link

    Sorry; first time commenting. I couldn't remember my login name before.

    Anyway, my laptop OCs better than that. Granted, it's a 1.7 to begin with, but the FSB will do 125 easily, with the same ram increase to boot - 420 MHz, with processor at 2.125. It will do a tad bit more, but that's enough for a laptop I'd say.
  • bobsmith1492 - Monday, February 7, 2005 - link

    test
  • Kalessian - Monday, February 7, 2005 - link

    #6, Oh yeah? Well, give a P4/A64 an SXGP(Super eXtremely Good Performance) setting and stay out of ITS way!

    Yawn, right now the P-M doesn't impress me at all. Let a CPU built for mobile systems stay in mobile systems until it gets rebuilt for desktops properly.

    Great review, learned a ton :)
  • GnomeCop - Monday, February 7, 2005 - link

    I have a 2.0ghz dothan system, I upgraded from an old 533mhz fsb p4.
    The speed for my work and games are just fine. I have a leadtek GF6800ultra in my system and its the only thing I have to worry about cooling.
    CPU is passively cooled and the system is expremely quiet running on a 359watt psu. By the time I need to upgrade, I will be buying a whole new cpu/mobo/everything anyways.
  • ksherman - Monday, February 7, 2005 - link

    seems like an a really good processor for buisness machines, given the L1 cahe speeds... and not much else (snas uber low power consumption)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now