Test Setup

 Performance Test Configuration
Processor(s): AMD Athlon 64 4000+ (2.4GHz) Socket 939
RAM: 2 x 512MB OCZ PC3200 Platinum Rev. 2
Hard Drive(s): Seagate 120GB 7200 RPM IDE (8MB Buffer)
Video AGP & IDE Bus Master Drivers: nVidia nForce 6.31 (nForce4 SLI)
SiS 1.17e
VIA 4in1 Hyperion 4.51 (12-02-2003)
nVidia nForce Platform Driver 4.24 (nForce3 Ultra)
Video Card(s): nVidia 6800 Ultra (AGP 8X)
nVidia 6800 Ultra (PCI Express)
Video Drivers: nVidia nForce 61.77 (SiS, VIA, nF3U, Intel 925X)
nVidia nForce 71.40 Beta (nForce4)
Operating System(s): Windows XP Professional SP1
Motherboards: DFI LANParty nF4 SLI-DR
DFI LANParty UT nF4 Ultra-D

Winfast 755FXK8AA (SiS 755FX)
Soltek K8TPro-939 (VIA K8T800 PRO)
Epox 9NDA3+ (nForce3 Ultra)
nVidia nForce4 Ultra Reference Board
Abit AV8 PRO (VIA K8T800 PRO)
ECS KV2 Extreme (VIA K8T800 PRO)
Gigabyte K8NSNXP-939 (nVidia nForce3 Ultra)
MSI K8N Neo2 (nVidia nForce3 Ultra)
MSI K8T Neo2 (VIA K8T800 PRO)

Tests used OCZ PC3200 Platinum Rev. 2, which uses Samsung TCCD chips. All memory ran at 2-2-2-7 timing in benchmarks on the DFI nForce4 boards.

The nVidia 6800 Ultra AGP was used for testing in all 939 chipsets other than nForce4. The PCI Express 6800 Ultra was used for all testing with the nForce4 and the Reference Intel 925X. Resolution in all benchmarks is 1024x768x32 unless noted otherwise.

Results for the DFI nForce4 boards are color-coded red in all graphs. VIA K8T800 Pro based motherboards are in green in our results, and nVidia nForce4/nForce3 are in orange. Results for the SiS 755FX based Winfast are yellow in all graphs. Intel results are included for Reference only and are blue in the graphs. The color coding should allow easy comparison of the tested DFI nF4 to other nF4/nF3 results and to other chipsets and processors.


Memory Stress Testing General Performance & Encoding
Comments Locked

114 Comments

View All Comments

  • bigtoe36 - Wednesday, February 2, 2005 - link

    regarding the NF3 939 i hear NF3 may disapear soon so we may never see an AGP version of this board.
  • Wesley Fink - Wednesday, February 2, 2005 - link

    DFI has advised that the final nF4 product line will consist of 3 models. The information on page 2 has been revised to reflect the latest information.

  • bigtoe36 - Wednesday, February 2, 2005 - link

    The extra molex is to add extra power to the board especially when using 2 video cards.

    The chipset fan is very quiet and does work quite well. When stressed the chipset does get quite warm though but I have seen no instability on my boards here and all use stock chipset cooling.

    The board will work with 20 and 24 pin ATX connectors.

    The SLI bridge can only be sold with SLI boards, you will be able to but it seperately though.
  • jwix - Wednesday, February 2, 2005 - link

    I've been waiting and waiting and waiting for this board. Finally, Anandtech posts this review late last night just as someone posts in the forum that the board is stocked at ZZF. I surf to ZZF. Indeed, the board is in stock. I quicky read the review then return to ZZF to buy. Board is out of Stock. *sigh* I'm betting the price of this board goes up before it goes down.
  • LoneWolf15 - Wednesday, February 2, 2005 - link

    A good review overall. Some questions I'd have liked to see answered though:

    a)As others have said, what is the 5.25" Molex power connector on the board for?
    b)ATX power connectors - does the board require the 24-pin, or, like other boards, will a 20pin +4pin P4 connector run it just fine?
    c) I'd have liked a little more detail on the maglev chipset fan, was it noisy, the design, etc. I'm being picky, but it's a new feature and all of us get annoyed when a northbridge HSF fails, especially if it's in a location where you can't replace it with just anything due to expansion cards.
    d)Question on the SLI finger-board: It seems like it doesn't come with the non-SLI boards, if it doesn't, how useful is it to be able to convert this to SLI? I've not seen retailers selling them separately.

    I like the boards. Only minor gripe is, I still need an onboard serial port, I use it for things like configuring a router now and again. Hopefully they include a backplate for it at least, though I'd doubt it.
  • Burbot - Wednesday, February 2, 2005 - link

    #22: It would be a good idea to look back at history of industries. When was the last time a sprinter broke a record by 8%? Probaby in first days of organized sprint. When was the last time processor speed increased by 8%? Every A64 200MHz speedbump gave slightly bettter improvements. 8% is difference between 2.4 and 2.6 GHz Athlon FX. Does one demolish the other? Or it is "merely" a fair improvement? I side with the latter.

    I do not want to diminish DFI effort, but I'd reserve "demolished" to huge improvements, as in "that A64 machine demolishes my Duron box".
  • lsman - Wednesday, February 2, 2005 - link

    #14. it provides extra current when under SLI mode so its more "stable"
  • Aquila76 - Wednesday, February 2, 2005 - link

    I've said it before, I'll ask for it again:

    SLI Mobo Roundup.

    Please.
  • byvis - Wednesday, February 2, 2005 - link

    The board is nice, but not outstanding, incredible, top performing, etc... Jesus AnandTech I have never seen you so biased. I hope that the benchmarks don't lie. Poor preview, poor...
  • Wesley Fink - Wednesday, February 2, 2005 - link

    ChineseDemocrcyGNR - Thank you for all your replies to reader's questions.

    #22 - Good analogy and a very accurate descrip-tion of breaking records at the top end. New CPU's are often hyped to the heavens and often they don't even do 8% more performance than the one they replace. Breaking new ground at the top is quite different than 8% in the middle.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now