A First Look at Pages

The idea behind Pages is to make document creation, layout and publishing easier than ever before.  If you've ever used Word for anything above and beyond just a text editor, it often times have little quirks that can frustrate you after dealing with them for a while - such as footnotes that don't always work properly, an ornery table of contents or especially dealing with graphics and text boxes and getting them to not screw up the pagination of your document.  Word is a very powerful word processor, but in all of its might, it has lost a considerable amount of simplicity.  Then there are page layout and publishing applications that generally require a higher level of expertise than what the beginner user is going to have, and they are generally much more expensive than $79.  So there is a need for something else. The question is whether or not Pages happens to be it. 

Before I get to the built-in templates within Pages, let me talk a bit about the interface.  When you're first dropped into Pages, you immediately notice that the interface is extremely bare, almost to the point where it is bland.  There is no font drop-down - all of the buttons you're used to seeing in a word processor or any application for that matter are all gone.  There's a row of 10 oversized buttons at the top of the page and that's it. 

The default view in Pages has no rules, no layout markers, nothing.  You can turn all of those on, but for me, they unnecessarily clutter the interface to be on all the time.

I mentioned that there is no font drop-down in Pages. Instead, in order to change the fonts and settings, you have to use the font panel, which you bring up by either hitting the button on the tool bar or hitting Command + T.  Despite my initial reactions to it, I actually preferred Apple's decision here simply because I rarely adjusted my fonts when typing in Word; it was just something that I had expected to be in the toolbar and unnecessarily so.  Font sizes are another thing, and this is one area where Pages encourages you to go in a much different route from what you may be used to.  Normally, you create page or paragraph headers by either making the header bold or increasing the font size. You can obviously do the same using the font panel in Pages, but there is an alternative.  Pages heavily encourages the use of styles for text, which are both pre-defined and user-definable. 

The other thing that Pages does extremely well is its handling of columns - there's a columns drop-down at the top of the page that will let you select from 1 - 4 columns.  You can adjust the number of columns within any shape object or apply it to the document as a whole, quite easily.

Despite the relatively simple interface, there are quite a few controls offered within Pages, they just remain hidden until you bring up the Pages Inspector.  The Inspector window is a small window that lets you adjust options for everything in Pages, as well as features things like document information.  If there's anything that you need to do or find in Pages, it's in the Inspector. 

For example, if you want to define more than 4 columns, click on the column button in the Inspector.  If you want to change how text wraps around objects, click on the appropriate button in the Inspector.  Colors, tables, charts, everything is customizable from the Inspector - and when you're done, you can leave it on the desktop or hide it.  You can also open up multiple Inspectors, each at a different settings page if you like having access to everything without bringing up more windows. 


Multiple Inspectors

iWork '05 A First Look at Pages (continued)
Comments Locked

198 Comments

View All Comments

  • elvisizer - Tuesday, January 25, 2005 - link

    stylex, the mini uses regular pc2700 ddr ram. nothing special about it.
  • egilDOTnet - Tuesday, January 25, 2005 - link

    And one more thing - regarding Office compability - I thought that the Appleworks package still was included with the Mac mini?? Is this not so anymore, Anand, or did you just forget about that?
  • elvisizer - Tuesday, January 25, 2005 - link

    #16 and #12- yes, it's true that if you don't have those items already you'll have to spend money to buy them. So what? if you don't have them sitting around, then the mini isn't as good a deal for you. The point is, for the vast majority of people buying one, a mini will not end up costing $1000. it'll end up costing $499+ 1 memory upgrade.

    also, there's one error in the article- anand says that TextEdit can't open Word documents. that's not true. TextEdit has been able to open and edit Word documents since 10.3 came out.
  • egilDOTnet - Tuesday, January 25, 2005 - link

    Just wanted to chime in on one thing - exporting images from iPhoto - you know that you can just select images, and then drag them out on the desktop or wherever you want them to be copied??

    Good article!
  • bupkus - Tuesday, January 25, 2005 - link

    I'd like one just to take it for a ride. I wholely support the idea of SFF and this certainly takes the "S" seriously. As to using less energy, 85W is probably as good as it gets.
    This is the first I've heard of AMD's mini-itx which uses Windows CE. I wonder if that means it's much more vulnerable to malware than the "mini". Sure it costs more than something like the Biostar IDEQ 210V, but if the "mini" means less free tech support to relatives who just web surf, I'd recommend it.
  • miketheidiot - Tuesday, January 25, 2005 - link

    #30 most people are still very computer illiterate. They also don't buy them because of their compatability or upgradability. They buy on cost alone and name. Apple has a name (whether a good or bad name is a matter of opinion) and now they have the price. I see no reason why these won't sell.
  • bigpow - Tuesday, January 25, 2005 - link

    >2) Sure you get better graphics with the mini and a better optical drive, but you get more memory and a faster hard drive with the Dell.

    Oh yeah... riiiight!
    Better graphics because you're imagining the picture! Dell comes with 15" LCD, Mac comes with your imagination.

    Nice comparison, duh!
  • Jeff7181 - Tuesday, January 25, 2005 - link

    I still think these titles that suggest the MiniMac will steal marketshare from the PC is rediculous. People don't use PC's because they're they come in the smallest form factors. They use them because of their compatability, upgradability, and cost. Apple has only scratched the cost issue with the MiniMac... but most PC users will avoid a Mac simply so they don't want to learn to use a computer all over again... for some people that's not an easy thing to do.
  • ehanneken - Tuesday, January 25, 2005 - link

    Stylex, Crucial's Mac page is http://www.crucial.com/mac/index.asp

    You would actually pay more to buy a 512 MB DIMM from Crucial than you would to upgrade the Mac Mini to 512 MB when you purchase it. On the other hand, you would end up with two DIMMs instead of one.

  • jasonsRX7 - Tuesday, January 25, 2005 - link

    #23 - Nail on the head :)

    #25 - Apples prices to add ram to the mini are reasonable. $75 to upgrade to 512mb, less if you're a student.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now