Gaming: Final Fantasy XV

Upon arriving to PC earlier this, Final Fantasy XV: Windows Edition was given a graphical overhaul as it was ported over from console, fruits of their successful partnership with NVIDIA, with hardly any hint of the troubles during Final Fantasy XV's original production and development.

In preparation for the launch, Square Enix opted to release a standalone benchmark that they have since updated. Using the Final Fantasy XV standalone benchmark gives us a lengthy standardized sequence to record, although it should be noted that its heavy use of NVIDIA technology means that the Maximum setting has problems - it renders items off screen. To get around this, we use the standard preset which does not have these issues.

Square Enix has patched the benchmark with custom graphics settings and bugfixes to be much more accurate in profiling in-game performance and graphical options. For our testing, we run the standard benchmark with a FRAPs overlay, taking a 6 minute recording of the test.

 

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

AnandTech IGP Low Medium High
Average FPS
95th Percentile

Even though our settings combinations end up being GPU limited very quickly, the Intel CPUs still appear near the top if not at the top.

Gaming: World of Tanks enCore Gaming: Ashes Classic (DX12)
Comments Locked

220 Comments

View All Comments

  • SKiT_R31 - Wednesday, May 20, 2020 - link

    Intel never left "the top". Top of 720p low graphics settings, by a single percentage margin. Totally worth 50% higher price.
  • silencer12 - Saturday, May 23, 2020 - link

    Give it more than 3 years
  • tracker1 - Wednesday, May 20, 2020 - link

    AMD has already shifted their pricing quite a bit from launch in anticipation of this... is it clearly a better option, for most people... unless you literally only care about gaming, then a 10900K or 10700K might be an okay option at their respective price points and only if you're using at least an RTX 2080 Super. If you're going anything lower on GPU, then AMD is probably the better option all the way around (and you'll probably save a bit on your annual power bill as a result).
  • VoraciousGorak - Wednesday, May 20, 2020 - link

    Finally, a sane product stack from Intel with regards to naming versus core/thread count.
  • Hifihedgehog - Wednesday, May 20, 2020 - link

    Sane and thermal meltdown don't mix.
  • ElvenLemming - Wednesday, May 20, 2020 - link

    Unfortunate that their product stack finally makes sense now that the name sounds so stupid I get angry every time I read it.
  • Spunjji - Tuesday, May 26, 2020 - link

    Whether it's "Eye-Nine Ten-Nine-Hundred-Kay" or "Eye-Nine Ten-Thousand-Nine-Hundred-Kay", it sounds equally daft.
  • tipoo - Wednesday, May 20, 2020 - link

    Chasing clocks and high power to counter AMD. Ah, Netburst, good times. Ish.
  • WaltC - Wednesday, May 20, 2020 - link

    I had forgotten Netburst...;) "The Intel CPU that accelerated the Internet"! Thanks for the laugh!
  • trparky - Wednesday, May 20, 2020 - link

    Yep, I agree.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now