Display Measurement

In terms of display, the Reno 10x plays it relatively safe with a 6.6” AMOLED panel at a resolution of 2340 x 1080. Aside from the now more common 19.5:9 aspect ratio, and the fact that it’s a bezel-less, cutout-less and notch-less design, there’s nothing particularly interesting about the display panel itself from a technical perspective.

From a software standpoint, things are also quite straightforward. Oppo offers two display modes, “Vivid” which targets a P3 gamut, and “Gentle” that aims for sRGB. Aside from the gamut choice which changes the colour saturations, there’s also a global colour temperature slider that is adjustable from “Cool” to “Warm”, with a default snap-in in the middle. I noted that the default colour temperature was quite cool, and the extreme “Warm” setting actually targets near 6500K, which is what I used for the accuracy testing of the display in this section, and what I recommend people to use if they wish for more accurate whites.

We move on to the display calibration and fundamental display measurements of the Reno 10x Zoom screen. As always, we thank X-Rite and SpecraCal, as our measurements are performed with an X-Rite i1Pro 2 spectrophotometer, with the exception of black levels which are measured with an i1Display Pro colorimeter. Data is collected and examined using SpectraCal's CalMAN software.

Display Measurement - Maximum Brightness  

In terms of brightness levels, the Reno 10x reaches a maximum manual brightness of 417cd/m². The result is average for this generation of OLED panels and is quite adequate. While the phone does have an adaptive brightness mode, I didn’t encounter any brightness difference in the panel when subjecting the phone under bright environmental conditions, so it doesn’t seem to have any brightness boosting mechanism.

 
SpectraCal CalMAN

I mentioned that I’m testing the phone with the colour temperature slider to its far end “Warm” setting, however it does seem that this setting is ever so slightly too red, resulting with reds being ever so slightly stronger. Adjusting the slider 1-2mm to the left likely resolves the issue.

The bigger issue in the greyscale accuracy test is the fact that the phone looks to be calibrated with higher gamma targets in mind. At a target 200cd/m² brightness setting with a constant APL50 and 50% window size, we’re seeing an average gamma of near 2.4 instead of the expected 2.2 for regular content. It does look like the phone has a non-linear brightness compensation based on APL and window size, however this is night impossible to accurately measure aside from using a static image with the target measurement patches.

SpectraCal CalMAN

Overall, the higher gamma will result in slightly darker tones in the image, giving off a sense of more contrast.

Display Measurement - Greyscale Accuracy

The greyscale accuracy dE2000 against a standard gamma target of 2.2 thus is relatively average with a deviation of 2.57. It’s still not too bad compared to what other phones exhibit, but it’s also not great.


SpectraCal CalMAN 

In the “Gentle” mode that targets the sRGB gamut, we see that the screen here has a few issues. The saturations points being too saturated are result of the higher gamma calibration of the display, so that’s expected, however the bigger issue is the hue shift in the magenta and cyan secondary channels, which show larger deviations than the relatively hue accurate primary channels as well as yellows.

Display Measurement - Saturation Accuracy - sRGB dE2000 

The saturations deltaE2000 ends up at 2.34, also not quite the best out there but at least not utterly disastrous.


SpectraCal CalMAN 

In the “Vivid” P3 gamut colourspace mode, the Reno 10x behaves largely the same, again showcasing the hue-shift in magentas and cyan. The dE2000 here is near identical at again 2.34.


SpectraCal CalMAN

Display Measurement - Gretag–Macbeth Colour Accuracy

In the Gretag Macbeth chart of common colour temperatures, we see an overall dE2000 of 2.99. Some colours have the expected luminosity and saturation errors due to the gamma, but the hue errors are also more evident in some colour patches.

Overall, the Oppo Reno 10x’s screen isn’t nothing too much out of the ordinary. As usual for an OLED panel, the viewing angles and contrast are great. The 1080p resolution on a screen of this size is a bit stretched out, so if you’re after a sharp screen I’d recommend looking elsewhere.

In terms of calibration, things were adequate enough, however there’s clearly much better options out there on the market if one values colour accuracy.

GPU Performance Battery Life
Comments Locked

40 Comments

View All Comments

  • Andrei Frumusanu - Wednesday, September 18, 2019 - link

    Forgot to edit that subtitle.
  • DanNeely - Wednesday, September 18, 2019 - link

    Page1: "The display is an AMOLED panel featuring a 2340 x 1080 resolution and comes at a rather large diameter of 6.6”. " diameter should be diagonal.
  • DanNeely - Wednesday, September 18, 2019 - link

    "Oppo alleviates this concern by including a small raised nub below the cameras, causing the phone to never actually be flush against any surfaces and thus vastly reducing possible scratches of the back glass near the cameras."

    Does this mean that if you set it down on the table and try to use it you're going to have a wobbly bad time?
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Wednesday, September 18, 2019 - link

    It wobbles if you press the top of the screen, the bottom 2/3rds are stable.
  • trivik12 - Wednesday, September 18, 2019 - link

    Since almost all flagship phones have night mode, can we do a shoot out and provide us strength and weakness plus overall winner. I guess best time would be when Pixel 4 is released.
  • flyingpants265 - Wednesday, September 18, 2019 - link

    -Needs front stereo speakers which allows you to hear youtube videos, movies, emulator games, camera videos, etc in full volume.
    -And wireless charging which is extremely useful, no port wear, start charging faster/with one hand, magnetic charging mount in the car.. Still use it all the time on my Nexus 5. Wireless charging pad cost me $3.00 on ebay.
    -The missing 3.5 headphone jack is not really ideal..
  • melgross - Wednesday, September 18, 2019 - link

    I’m not convinced that a pop up camera is a good idea, particularly if all that mechanics and electronic is there to just eliminate a hole in the screen.

    Notice that there’s no water and dust rating. That’s because it’s almost impossible to keep water and dust out of the slot. I can see grit from wind picking it up, being deposited inside that slot, eventually scratching the lenses and eventually causing the module to grind to a halt. Moisture too. It will remain in the slot for some time, causing problems.
  • eastcoast_pete - Wednesday, September 18, 2019 - link

    Thanks Andrei! Agree with you and others here that the pop up camera is a gimmick that adds complexity and weight, not to mention anything that moves is another thing that can break. Too bad Oppo didn't put the extra weight and complexity to make a really good periscope style optical zoom camera - if done correctly, they can be spectacular.
    @Andrei: Lastly, one question and request: what about the call quality of this and other phones? Please add a sentence or two on this to your reviews, good call quality is a non-negotiable for me and probably many others.
    I do use my smartphone as my main phone, and had to bench/retire my Xiaomi Mi Max 3 phone due to really horrible call quality (on both sides, got many complaints over poor voice quality). I loved many aspects of that phone, especially the big screen and battery, but it was basically useless as a daily driver. Now back to an older LG phone, not as good otherwise, but I can make and receive clear phonecalls.
  • PreacherEddie - Wednesday, September 18, 2019 - link

    I believe the top of page 2 comes from a previous review and you need to edit it for the Oppo.
  • edsib1 - Wednesday, September 18, 2019 - link

    I have no idea how your Oppo10x zooms scores so low in benchmarks. My UK version scores very high in all benchmark scores. Antutu score of 370k, geekbench 4score 3514/11314 . Pcmark work2 performance score is 10564

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now