Conclusion & End Remarks

The Xperia 1 is a very important device to Sony as it marks major changes in the company’s product strategy. While I go over the various parts of the device in the conclusion, I do have to remind reader that the phone was launched with a release price of $/€949 which currently stands quite a lot higher than other Android flagships in the market.

Design wise, I do really like the Xperia 1. Sony’s choice of differentiating themselves in the design by adopting a 21:9 screen works out really well and it is very much a different experience than other narrower aspect ratio devices. The change reminded me of the original shift from 16:9 to 18:9 phones a few years ago.

The biggest benefit here isn’t what Sony makes it out to be; although there’s some gains for video consumption and yes it does fill up native 21:9 content such as movies a lot better, I still think that’s going to be a rarity for most users – unless you’re really into watching moves on the small screen. For me personally the biggest benefit is simply having more vertical space for more content in applications, which does work very well on the Xperia 1.

The one thing that I would think would improve things even better is if Sony actually improved the navigation and maybe introduced gesture navigation to get rid of the default Android P nav bar – I still think Google majorly messed it up and it was a stupid change to make from the classical nav buttons. Sony being the only other major vendor to adopt it by default strikes me more as them not having put in the resources to customise it.

Other benefits of the device’s aspect ratio is that even though it’s a big screen and larger device, its ergonomics remain excellent as the 72mm width is at a sweet spot many users will like. The round edges of the phone are also comfortable to overall I enjoyed the Xperia 1’s in-hand feel.

The other part of the the 21:9 aspect ratio is the display panel itself. This is the first 4K OLED display in a smartphone, and I have mixed feelings about it. It’s an incredibly sharp display and you’ll notice its clarity. However while there is a difference to 1440p screens out there, I do have to question if it’s actually worth it. The fact that Sony still renders applications at 1440p and only reserves the full native resolution of the display for photos and video playback is a bit counter-intuitive, as you’d imagine text rendering being the use-case that would most benefit the higher resolution. Make no mistake, the 4K panel still improves such content even if it’s rendered in 1440p.

For the vast majority of users though I doubt anybody will actually notice the difference. Unless again you’re used to watching content very close up on your phone, you’d be hard to tell the difference to a 1440p screen at normal arm’s length distance.

Other characteristics of the display are fine – brightness and viewing angles are excellent. The colour calibration of the panel however is not. Here even though Sony promises some more professional grade features, they are quite misleading in their marketing as they don’t match up to the technical characteristics of the phone. It’s actually quite embarrassing for Sony to promote an accurate display profile yet then very evidently miscalibrate it with some noticeable gamma issues, and I had to manually set a more accurate colour temperature.

Performance of the Xperia 1 is good. The Snapdragon 855 serves as a great cornerstone of the phone and the experience is similar to that of other devices in the market, and I haven’t had issues with Sony’s implementation.

Gaming wise, even though the phone showcases some very severe CPU throttling, the GPU throttling is kept in check and still manages to perform quite well compared to other S855 devices bar the OnePlus 7 Pro – which was a bit surprising as the Xperia 1’s thermal design didn’t quite seem as good as that of other phones.

Battery life is a major negative for the phone. Here there’s a double-whammy of a power consuming display as well as a smaller battery that lands the Xperia 1 amongst the bottom of our charts. The 4K resolution screen here is just another negative that maybe wasn’t needed for the product to be a good device, and in fact I believe it would have been a better device without it. The 3330mAh battery is alright but not quite matching that of what other vendors are able to implement in similar sized devices. Sony also foregoes wireless charging on the phone – one has to wonder about the internal design.

The cameras on the Xperia 1 are good, but not great. I don’t have too much experience with Sony’s past devices but I hear they weren’t very good in the photography department. While I’m sure the Xperia 1 has improved here, there’s still major issues. Dynamic range is the number one issue, with the phone evidently not able to deal with scenes of very high contrast and the camera just falls apart – both in daylight and in night time photography. Colour temperature was another issue as sometimes things were just too warm, although this can be fixed after the fact with a simple white balance.

Where the Xperia’s strengths lie is in the sheer amount of detail that the camera is able to capture. I was thoroughly impressed by the results and the phone is quite far ahead of all of the competition in this area, resulting in resolving significantly better spatial resolution, detail, and textures. The wide-angle lens in particular, while having the dynamic range issues, is quite far ahead other phones when it comes to the clarity of the pictures.

Low-light performance of the phone isn’t good. Here Sony falls behind Apple’s iPhone XS which itself falls behind essentially most other Android devices over the last year who have embraced computational photography.

Video recording quality on the Xperia 1 was good- although the experience isn’t as good as say a Galaxy S10. HDR video quality is good, however Sony’s current implementation of the EIS on the main sensor is a disaster and I would just keep it off instead of enduring the jittery picture jumps. The wide-angle video is alright, but the camera really lacks dynamic range here as it’s not able to use HDR.

The stereo speaker setup of the Xperia 1 is adequate but can’t compete with the full-ness of the iPhone XS or Galaxy S10. Also Sony abandoning the 3.5mm headphone jack is just overall a very sad situation.

Overall, I’m not convinced by the Xperia 1. I started this page by mentioning it’s a $949 phone, and at that price level I’m expecting excellence at most aspects of the phone. Unfortunately, the new Sony phone doesn’t showcase that. The screen and form-factor great, however is calibration issues, its higher power draw resulting in worse off battery performance, and the phone’s many problems with the cameras just don’t make it appealing as a purchase. This is especially in the face of the competition released earlier in the year which has seen larger price drops with which you’ll definitely end up as getting more value out of your purchase. Sony’s product development needs to focus on actually delivering a more solid and robust phone, rather than trying to upsell it via marketing buzz-words – here’s to hoping they’ll manage to get there.

Video Recording
Comments Locked

75 Comments

View All Comments

  • flyingpants265 - Monday, July 29, 2019 - link

    You know, they could just make a phone with all the features people want. In all sizes. Why don't you ask for that instead?

    Front speakers, 5000mAh battery, fast wireless charging, waterproofing that actually works, usb-c/audio jack, in-screen fingerprint reader that works properly, under-screen camera. 5", 5.6" and 6.2" options.

    16:9 or 17:9 screen, no ridiculous screens that are the size of a TV remote. MicroSD would be nice, but I'd be willing to sacrifice it if we got cheap 128gb/256gb options.
  • HJr. - Tuesday, July 30, 2019 - link

    Congratulations you describe Galaxy S10!
  • inperfectdarkness - Sunday, August 18, 2019 - link

    I have an Xperia XZ2 Compact and I love it. That said, yes, the only compelling reason to buy Sony was for a smartphone that wasn't actually a phablet. I do miss the 3.5mm jack. I can survive w/o wireless charging; and that's really the one and only thing I had to give up over the full size XZ2. Honestly, the Z3 compact was only a smidgen smaller than the XZ2 (127.3 x 64.9 x 8.6 mm for the Z3 compact vs. 135 x 65 x 12.1 mm for the XZ2 compact).

    My XZ2 will have to be pried from my cold dead hands. It truly is the last of the flagship-level "compact" smartphones.
  • abufrejoval - Friday, July 26, 2019 - link

    I’ve been close to buying a Sony device some years ago, Snapdragon 800 generation when they had a thinner and bigger competitor to the Galaxy Note, I believe and I generally value them as a great engineering company.

    Betting on this form factor is obviously a risk: If they find enough fans in that niche as well as the compact one, I’d be happy to see them survive.

    I may watch a small video here and there on a phone, but watching a full-length movie on that screen would only work for me if you could fit it into a headset, like Google Cardboard or LeEco LeVR: The Sony screen seems to have a good enough resolution to make that attractive e.g. for a longer plane ride. Any idea on if such a device is working/available for this Sony?

    My major smartphone usage is reading and browsing so actually I could be more easily tempted by a 16:10 (like the original Galaxy Note) or 3:2 device (another niche, Sony!).

    And at that price it requires a fully functioning desktop replacement mode with Ethernet and a 4k monitor available via a docking station as well as properly managed DPI adaptations for OS and apps at dock/undock to work out economically.

    Another issue with Sony phone has been that I prefer custom ROMs in general, and Sony devices tend to lose a lot of their photo/video capabilities on AOSP.

    I was surprised to see a Czech/French dictionary (and more Czech books) in your library: I would have guessed that your mother tongue was Rumanian and that in Luxembourg you’ll have to manage with French, Germany and Lëtzebuergesch as well as English.

    Some commentators here don’t appreciate that when you deal with four languages or more on a daily base, certain errors tend to creep in. I manage German, English, Spanish and French pretty much every day and towards the evening or with current temperatures all can deteriorate to a point just short of mumbo jumbo.
  • GlossGhost - Sunday, July 28, 2019 - link

    If you think Sony have it bad with custom ROM's, try Samsung. You literally get dogshit camera quality, no hardware acceleration (at least on the Exynos model), no Always On Display and probably many of the framework boosters.
  • abufrejoval - Tuesday, July 30, 2019 - link

    The custom ROM situation is only getting worse, because vendors need you to buy a new device regularly: Their temptation to boycott is easy to understand and completely intolerable.

    My Samsung Note 3 followed a Note (1) and that the initial i9000 that made Jobs lose it.

    They all still work thanks to replacable batteries and custom ROMs.

    The Note 3 is stilly actually still used regularly (runs Pie) as a backup device on my fairly regular business trips across the EU.

    Screen protectors, silicon protection cases and a plastic body have kept them look like new, despite various drops on streets not always dry or clean.

    Everything Samsung delivered since, was just plain nonsense, badly overpriced or putting corporate interests so much before customers (Exynos), that it hurts: I travel internationally and want a global phone, even if I live mostly in Europe. Geographic market segmentation is so anti mobile they might as well sell them with a cable.

    I got a LeEco Le Max2 next (also still active) and can't see any reason to upgrade beyond my current OnePlus 5 (finally a phone so efficient, I totally lost my battery anxiety), rather unfortunately really, because I really like playing with toys with new features. Those three run on linked corporate SIMs with global roaming and with identical apps and launchers, so I can switch between them very seamlessly. Haven't bothered with hotel or public Wifi in years, none come even close to the ~100Mbit LTE data rates tend to get, at least in Europe. 5G? Can't quite imagine why I'd need it any time soon.

    Unfortunately, mobile phones develop only features I cannot appreciate or even dislike (rounded screens, glass/metal cases), yet none of those I'd consider valuable (good desktop mode with 4K monitor and cable Ethernet for Wifi-less office use).

    So I need to spend my play-money on new toys like the DJI Robomaster, except that for some reason they don't sell it in Europe yet... Nobody wants to sell me what I want!

    Is that the new way of selling more? Making sure you never get what you want so you'll have to keep on buying?
  • philehidiot - Sunday, July 28, 2019 - link

    On the ISS they use Runglish or something, which is the blend of Russian and English that just developed on the station due to constantly flipping between languages.
  • sonny73n - Friday, July 26, 2019 - link

    AT, Sony experia isn’t worth our time. Give us something else, anything!
  • Teckk - Friday, July 26, 2019 - link

    Not sure if the width is enough looks lil weird. For that price - the battery capacity and RAM (compared to other phones) and seems to be relatively less.
  • Arbie - Friday, July 26, 2019 - link

    A media machine with no headphone jack. Smart.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now