Camera - Daylight Evaluation

Click for full image
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ P30 Pro ] - [ G8 ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ iPhone XS ]

Starting off in the first scene, the exposure of the X1 is good although it’s lacking a bit in the highlights. The colour temperature is also a bit off as the clouds weren’t nearly as grey. It doesn’t crush the shadows nearly as bad as the Pixel 3, however it lags behind the S10 in dynamic range.

Where the Xperia 1 shines is in detail. The phone manages so much detail in the foliage of this scene that it’s far ahead of any other phone in the comparison. The phone’s camera must have outstanding optics as well as excellent deep trench isolation on the sensor to be able to resolve this much sharpness.

On the telephoto lens the exposure is more similar to that of Samsung and Apple, however the colour temperature is still a bit too warm. Here in terms of detail Sony’s advantage isn’t nearly as pronounced, winning some parts of the scene while losing others.

On the wide-angle photo, the scene is much too underexposed and the colour temperature remains off. The Snapdragon S10 had the best composition here as the scene optimizer on the Exynos messed up things. When we zoom in to investigate details, we again see Sony far ahead in terms of detail compared to other wide-angle camera phones. Even though there’s a big resolution and angle difference, Sony even manages to beat Huawei’s 20MP wide-angle sensor which until now I deemed as the best of its kind in terms of detail. The Xperia 1’s wide-angle optics looks to be superior to the competition as it’s avoiding chromatic aberrations and blur even on the very edges of the frame, something that’s very hard to do for a 130° small wide angle lens such as found on the phone.

Click for full image
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ P30 Pro ] - [ G8 ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ iPhone XS ]

On the next scene we see a good exposure, however the HDR processing is a bit too aggressive and thus the image ends up slightly flatter than it should be. Detail-wise, Sony is again far ahead of everybody else and it manages to get an astounding amount of level of detail in the whole scene.

On the telephoto, exposure is good but composition is weird as it’s lacking a tad of dynamic range and the levels are all too compressed together. There’s also far too much red in the picture and the colour temperature is thus unnatural.

The wide angle here did a great exposure and dynamic range is also good, but that colour temperature is just really bad. Simply auto-balancing the result afterwards gives a much better picture than what the camera is able to output.

Detail-wise Sony again beats the competition and battling with Huawei’s 20MP unit, but ends up still winning on the outer parts of the frame.

While it wasn’t as obvious in the previous shot, here we can more clearly see that the wide angle lens’ distortion characteristics are very different from that of other phones. The fish-eye lens effect is much more pronounced on the Sony phone. The camera does have an option to correct for the distortion in pictures, and this work very well, although it loses a bit of the field of view and can also end up with a slight regression in quality due to the post-processing. This mode is off by default and that’s how I captured the scenes – other phones such as the S10 also offer lens distortion correction but obviously they don’t need a quite as heavy correction as the Xperia 1.

Click for full image
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ P30 Pro ] - [ G8 ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ iPhone XS ]

In this shot, the Xperia 1 could have done better with the exposure as it near clips the shadows where it shouldn’t have, most obvious in the tree. Details and textures continue to be excellent.

The telephoto is very good but I would have liked the processing to maintain the highlights of the white building in the sun such as on the other phones. Colour temperature is again a bit warm.

Dynamic range on the wide-angle here lags a bit behind, the shadows are too dark. Details are again outstanding.

Click for full image
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ P30 Pro ] - [ G8 ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ iPhone XS ]

Next up we see the Xperia 1 lagging behind a bit again in dynamic range and the local tone mapping of the HDR, but it’s not too bad. Details on the left building are excellent and the Sony camera manages to preserve the texture better than any other phone.

On both the telephoto lens and on the wide angle lens, this shot ended up quite a failure for the Xperia 1 as its HDR didn’t manage to compensate for the sky like on other phones or on its main sensor, ending up with a very blown out result. So even though detail is again great, it’s not a useable picture.

Click for full image
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ P30 Pro ] - [ G8 ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ iPhone XS ]

Next up, the Sony didn’t do well in the exposure as the picture lacks any levels beyond 85-90% which ends up with no highlights at all even though the scene is in direct full sunlight.

In the telephoto again it’s a bit too shy with the highlights as the building is in sunlight. Excellent detail overall.

The wide angle has good exposure and dynamic range, but again the phone loves its warm colour temperature too much. This scene again makes the fish-eye lens distortion much more pronounced.

Click for full image
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ P30 Pro ] - [ G8 ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ iPhone XS ]

This shot is really tough on the dynamic range and unfortunately the X1 didn’t manage to keep up, blowing up and clipping the highlights of the scene. The telephoto lens also is near too high exposure on the background.

The wide angle results were interesting as two consecutive shots ended up quite different in the HDR processing. One shot the background was again too overexposed, and in the other it was brought down. Both really weren’t too good on the exposure and dynamic range and lagged behind by a lot.

Click for full image
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ P30 Pro ] - [ G8 ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ iPhone XS ]

I’ve grown to like this scene as most phones just fail on colour temperature. The Xperia 1 is one of them and the result is far too gray, with only the wide-angle getting some sort of more reasonable colours.

All three cameras are very much struggling with dynamic range and the highlights are blown out. The Xperia continues to have outstanding detail quality throughout the scenes and modules.

Click for full image
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ P30 Pro ] - [ G8 ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ iPhone XS ]

The stand-out aspect of indoor shots such as this one is the Xperia’s ability to retain detail. Here the phone again manages to beat every other device out there.

Click for full image
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ P30 Pro ] - [ G8 ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ iPhone XS ]

Close-up and macro shots will exhibit some hazing and bokeh blurring due to the f/1.6 aperture. Details in the focal plane are excellent but we have to remember it’s also a quite narrow plane.

Click for full image
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ iPhone XS ]

I did a quick panorama test with a limited set of phones, and discovered that the Sony has massive issues here. The exposure is for the sky and the scenery is just vastly underexposed and too dark. Other phones are able to maintain a fuller dynamic range even in the panorama mode.

Daylight Camera Conclusion

Overall the Sony Xperia 1 is a good daylight shooter, however I found that it did have troubles with colour temperature and with dynamic range. Exposure of the shots was fine most of the time, however the processing was quite inconsistent and many times it either lacked in the shadows or it couldn’t deal with highlights. The latter was especially a problem as there were many shots where the phone resorted to just blowing out parts of the scene as it couldn’t deal with the natural dynamic range of the shot. Here Sony largely lags behind by quite some amount.

Colour temperature was also often a problem as the phone has the tendency to be too warm. A lot of the pictures here look significantly better after a quick white balance after the fact - Sony should definitely look into improving this part of the processing.

Where the phone does shine however is in detail and texture preservation. I don’t know if it’s due to the optics, a better sensor, or simply a non-stupid image processing, but the Xperia 1 is leading all other phones by quite some considerable margin when it comes to the actual resulting spatial resolution of images. This was especially noticeable in a lot of the foliage and fine textures in many of the scenes, where other phones would just blur things together while Sony actually manages to get out every pixel out of that 12MP sensor.

The telephoto lens was good – it had some of the same HDR issues as the main camera although not as pronounced.

The wide-angle lens of the Xperia 1 is interesting. First of all, what we said about the detail is especially pronounced on the wide-angle camera and it is leaps ahead of Samsung and Huawei in terms of the details the camera can resolve. HDR issues aside, the other interesting aspect here is that Sony’s optics have a significantly more pronounced fish-eye distortion that what we’ve seen from any other smartphone wide-angle lens. I guess it’s a matter of preference, but Sony does offer a distortion correction option which pretty much alleviates this aspect.

Overall, I even though the Xperia 1 has some astounding positives in regards to the details the cameras can achieve, I still think they lag a tad behind some other competitors simply because there’s issues with the HDR as well as the colour balance.

Battery Life - Meagre Results Camera - Low Light Evaluation
Comments Locked

75 Comments

View All Comments

  • flyingpants265 - Monday, July 29, 2019 - link

    You know, they could just make a phone with all the features people want. In all sizes. Why don't you ask for that instead?

    Front speakers, 5000mAh battery, fast wireless charging, waterproofing that actually works, usb-c/audio jack, in-screen fingerprint reader that works properly, under-screen camera. 5", 5.6" and 6.2" options.

    16:9 or 17:9 screen, no ridiculous screens that are the size of a TV remote. MicroSD would be nice, but I'd be willing to sacrifice it if we got cheap 128gb/256gb options.
  • HJr. - Tuesday, July 30, 2019 - link

    Congratulations you describe Galaxy S10!
  • inperfectdarkness - Sunday, August 18, 2019 - link

    I have an Xperia XZ2 Compact and I love it. That said, yes, the only compelling reason to buy Sony was for a smartphone that wasn't actually a phablet. I do miss the 3.5mm jack. I can survive w/o wireless charging; and that's really the one and only thing I had to give up over the full size XZ2. Honestly, the Z3 compact was only a smidgen smaller than the XZ2 (127.3 x 64.9 x 8.6 mm for the Z3 compact vs. 135 x 65 x 12.1 mm for the XZ2 compact).

    My XZ2 will have to be pried from my cold dead hands. It truly is the last of the flagship-level "compact" smartphones.
  • abufrejoval - Friday, July 26, 2019 - link

    I’ve been close to buying a Sony device some years ago, Snapdragon 800 generation when they had a thinner and bigger competitor to the Galaxy Note, I believe and I generally value them as a great engineering company.

    Betting on this form factor is obviously a risk: If they find enough fans in that niche as well as the compact one, I’d be happy to see them survive.

    I may watch a small video here and there on a phone, but watching a full-length movie on that screen would only work for me if you could fit it into a headset, like Google Cardboard or LeEco LeVR: The Sony screen seems to have a good enough resolution to make that attractive e.g. for a longer plane ride. Any idea on if such a device is working/available for this Sony?

    My major smartphone usage is reading and browsing so actually I could be more easily tempted by a 16:10 (like the original Galaxy Note) or 3:2 device (another niche, Sony!).

    And at that price it requires a fully functioning desktop replacement mode with Ethernet and a 4k monitor available via a docking station as well as properly managed DPI adaptations for OS and apps at dock/undock to work out economically.

    Another issue with Sony phone has been that I prefer custom ROMs in general, and Sony devices tend to lose a lot of their photo/video capabilities on AOSP.

    I was surprised to see a Czech/French dictionary (and more Czech books) in your library: I would have guessed that your mother tongue was Rumanian and that in Luxembourg you’ll have to manage with French, Germany and Lëtzebuergesch as well as English.

    Some commentators here don’t appreciate that when you deal with four languages or more on a daily base, certain errors tend to creep in. I manage German, English, Spanish and French pretty much every day and towards the evening or with current temperatures all can deteriorate to a point just short of mumbo jumbo.
  • GlossGhost - Sunday, July 28, 2019 - link

    If you think Sony have it bad with custom ROM's, try Samsung. You literally get dogshit camera quality, no hardware acceleration (at least on the Exynos model), no Always On Display and probably many of the framework boosters.
  • abufrejoval - Tuesday, July 30, 2019 - link

    The custom ROM situation is only getting worse, because vendors need you to buy a new device regularly: Their temptation to boycott is easy to understand and completely intolerable.

    My Samsung Note 3 followed a Note (1) and that the initial i9000 that made Jobs lose it.

    They all still work thanks to replacable batteries and custom ROMs.

    The Note 3 is stilly actually still used regularly (runs Pie) as a backup device on my fairly regular business trips across the EU.

    Screen protectors, silicon protection cases and a plastic body have kept them look like new, despite various drops on streets not always dry or clean.

    Everything Samsung delivered since, was just plain nonsense, badly overpriced or putting corporate interests so much before customers (Exynos), that it hurts: I travel internationally and want a global phone, even if I live mostly in Europe. Geographic market segmentation is so anti mobile they might as well sell them with a cable.

    I got a LeEco Le Max2 next (also still active) and can't see any reason to upgrade beyond my current OnePlus 5 (finally a phone so efficient, I totally lost my battery anxiety), rather unfortunately really, because I really like playing with toys with new features. Those three run on linked corporate SIMs with global roaming and with identical apps and launchers, so I can switch between them very seamlessly. Haven't bothered with hotel or public Wifi in years, none come even close to the ~100Mbit LTE data rates tend to get, at least in Europe. 5G? Can't quite imagine why I'd need it any time soon.

    Unfortunately, mobile phones develop only features I cannot appreciate or even dislike (rounded screens, glass/metal cases), yet none of those I'd consider valuable (good desktop mode with 4K monitor and cable Ethernet for Wifi-less office use).

    So I need to spend my play-money on new toys like the DJI Robomaster, except that for some reason they don't sell it in Europe yet... Nobody wants to sell me what I want!

    Is that the new way of selling more? Making sure you never get what you want so you'll have to keep on buying?
  • philehidiot - Sunday, July 28, 2019 - link

    On the ISS they use Runglish or something, which is the blend of Russian and English that just developed on the station due to constantly flipping between languages.
  • sonny73n - Friday, July 26, 2019 - link

    AT, Sony experia isn’t worth our time. Give us something else, anything!
  • Teckk - Friday, July 26, 2019 - link

    Not sure if the width is enough looks lil weird. For that price - the battery capacity and RAM (compared to other phones) and seems to be relatively less.
  • Arbie - Friday, July 26, 2019 - link

    A media machine with no headphone jack. Smart.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now