Conclusion & End Remarks

In many ways, the P30 Pro and P30 are both iterative phones. Both devices are taking aspects first introduced in their predecessor P20 series – as well as the sister Mate 20 series – and improving and packaging them into phones with an emphasis on photography.

Design wise, the smaller P30 doesn’t differ all that much from the P20, keeping the same form-factor and also a similar design. Build quality has improved, and the device looks a more premium than its predecessor, mostly due to industrial design changes such the removal of the plastic rim between the body frame and the back glass panel.

Huawei’s choice to go with flat top and bottom frames is quite odd, and it gives the phones a more industrial look and feel than what we’ve become accustomed with compared to the more traditional rounded slab designs.

The bigger P30 Pro adopts the ergonomics of the Mate 20 Pro, meaning it has a curved and flowing display and back cover glass design. I find this design quite fantastic in terms of in-hand feel as well as ergonomics, and it makes the P30 Pro feel like much smaller phone than it actually is. One negative of the new ergonomics is the weight of the phone: at 192g the P30 Pro is a lot heavier than competing devices of its size.

The displays on both P30s are good. Particularly the move to an OLED augments the smaller P30 compared to its predecessor, the LCD-based P20. Huawei was able to seemingly avoid any display issues this time around, as opposed to the concerns of the LG panel units on the Mate 20 Pro. Colour calibration on both phones is good, albeit not excellent. Huawei has achieved better in past models, but it’s not a deal-breaker for the P30s. The only negative about the screens is that I really wish Huawei would have gone 1440p on the P30 Pro – there really is not technical excuse not to adopt it, and it’s just a matter of implementing it correctly.

The dew-drop display notches on the phones are minimal and not intrusive, and I find them better alternatives than what Samsung went with this year.

An odd difference between the two phones is that the P30 has an earpiece speaker while the bigger P30 Pro goes with a piezoelectric under-screen actuator. The problem here is that I just do not see the advantage of these new designs; the earpiece on the P30 is barely visible and sounds better. Unlike Samsung and LG’s recent models, neither of the P30s have stereo playback, and thus lag behind significantly in terms of speaker playback quality. To top off the audio concerns, Huawei continues the senseless design choice of skipping a headphone jack on larger and more expensive P30 Pro while including it on the smaller model..

Both phones have optical under-screen fingerprint sensors, and they’re excellent. The implementation is as good as OnePlus’s, and it’s a much faster sensor than Samsung’s ultrasonic units in the Galaxy S10 series.

The performance of the P30s is excellent thanks to the Kirin 980 SoC. We’ve covered this in past Kirin 980 devices and the new SoC is able to keep up with Qualcomm’s and Samsung’s best for this generation. GPU performance lags a bit behind the flagship competition, but it’s not too bad as it ties in with Snapdragon 845 devices.

Battery life for both phones is excellent, although no longer quite as class-leading, as this title remains with the Mate 20 as well as the new Galaxy S10+.

Cameras Differentiate the P30s

The main selling point of the P-series are supposed to be their cameras, and here Huawei did make some large and interesting changes.

First of all, both P30s now add the wide-angle sensors which were introduced in the Mate 20 series. The additions are fantastic to the shooting experience and Huawei is able to deliver very high quality results, with the P30 Pro having an advantage in quality due to its better sensor.

The zoom optics on the P30 remained the same as what we’ve found on the P20 Pro and Mate 20 Pro – it’s excellent and is able to achieve a higher optical zoom factor than competing devices. Due to the main sensor being 40MP, capturing digitally zoomed in/cropped shots at 2x factor while in 10MP results in little to no quality loss, with the 3x module picking up the slack for further away objects.

While the 5x telephoto module on the P30 Pro is technically impressive in just how far it’s able to go, I’m not very convinced that it’s actually all that beneficial to the everyday capture experience. In particular the device fails to properly bridge the gap between a ~2x and 5x zoom factor, where you’re left with deteriorating image quality and purely digital zooming on the main camera sensor. I honestly do not think that this is how most people use their phones, and I think the 3x zoom on the P30 and previous Huawei devices was a better alternative for the capture experience and most scenarios.

The main camera sensor on the P30s is also interesting. In daylight shots, there are some clear compromises in the new modules. The optics just aren’t as good as what's found on the Mate 20 Pro, and both units suffer from more chromatic aberrations on the outer edges of the images, something that’s immediately visible in the native 40MP capture modes. This issue affects the P30 Pro more than the P30 due to its wider aperture.

Also visible in daylight shots is that detail preservation isn’t as good as the Mate 20 Pro. Besides the optics, this might be caused by the new RYYB sensor which might not have as good pixel isolation as the previous generation sensor.

Daylight processing has changed when compared to the Mate 20 Pro, and while in most cases it’s better, in some cases it also saw regressions. The problem for Huawei is that there’s too large a difference in the processing and resulting images between the different modules. Again I feel as if Huawei putting the responsibility of achieving the best result to the user instead of delivering the best results out of the box. The phones are incredibly versatile in their cameras, but this is also their downfall as they lack consistency.

In low-light scenarios, the P30s are both absolute winners. The new sensor, and particularly the new optics with OIS on the P30 Pro, raise the bar yet again in terms of what one can expect out of a smartphone camera. Huawei’s real only competition here is Google’s Night Sight mode, however once it gets dark enough even the Pixel phones cannot compete with then new Huawei hardware. Compared to other vendors, it’s a completely different league.

 

Lastly, there’s the question of if the P30 phones are worth their money. Unfortunately I think Huawei’s yet again coming in a little too high on pricing. I have a hard time justifying the P30 Pro’s 999€ price point. The issue here is not only the competition, but also the question of whether this actually represents a better value than say the company’s own Mate 20 Pro, which can now be had for 699€. While impressive, I do not see the 5x telephoto lens as a selling point for the P30 Pro. This leaves the much better low-light capture as the only substantial benefit, as otherwise the P30 Pro represents a downgrade in speaker and display quality, with possibly slightly better battery life.

The P30’s 749€ price seems more reasonable, however again the Galaxy S10 is just 50€ more today, and you’re trading in the excellent low-light capture for an overall better phone.

I think both P30 phones are good devices, however it might be worth to wait a couple of months for the inevitable price drop, as the phones don’t tick all the boxes to be able to justify their launch MSRPs.

 
Video Recording
Comments Locked

85 Comments

View All Comments

  • SwordOS - Thursday, April 18, 2019 - link

    @Andrei, you're saying the galaxy s10+ battery life is better than the p30 pro's one, but reviewers everywhere are still saying that the battery life on the p30pro is phenomenal and you can hit 2 days of usage, while with the s10+ (and s10) you can barely hit one day of usage. Also, the difference in battery life between wifi and 4g with the galaxy s10+ (at least for the exynos variant) seems to be way more noticeable than on the p30pro. Did you also try these phones in a real day of usage? Maybe benchmarks cannot be translated to real life usage..
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Thursday, April 18, 2019 - link

    > and you can hit 2 days of usage, while with the s10+ (and s10) you can barely hit one day of usage

    Such claims are just bollocks. I have the S10+ Exynos as a daily and I'm sitting at 47% at 2 days with 5h screentime. Similarly the P30 Pro isn't bad but it just doesn't last as long due to the base power simply being 120mW less efficient.
  • SwordOS - Thursday, April 18, 2019 - link

    so are all european reviewers lying except you? I trust you, but this is strange
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Thursday, April 18, 2019 - link

    Yes, most European reviewers have their data wrong. It's because they didn't identify some firmware issues and got the articles out as soon as possible. I identified the issues and avoided it for the review; meanwhile Samsung has issued firmware updates at the end of March which fixed the drain issues. Of course those reviews weren't updated.
  • SwordOS - Thursday, April 18, 2019 - link

    Did drain issues occurred only after making a voip call or even for other reasons?
  • RMerlin - Thursday, April 18, 2019 - link

    "Huawei still uses Broadcom BCM4359 WiFi combo chips" AFAIK, they use a HiSilicon Hi1103.
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Thursday, April 18, 2019 - link

    Went and checked again, you're right. I was tricked by the phone still coming with the BCM4359 firmware.
  • s.yu - Thursday, April 18, 2019 - link

    Now why do they have Broadcom firmware if they use their own modem?
  • N Zaljov - Friday, April 19, 2019 - link

    Probably BSP leftovers. Some Hi3680-based boards still use a BCM4359, and since most of the devices will rely on the same BSP (with minor little additions like bindings for the various different batteries, displays etc. that Huawei uses), they most probably just kept the Broadcom stuff in there.
  • nicolaim - Thursday, April 18, 2019 - link

    749€ for a phone with no OIS, no waterproofing, and no wireless charging? No thanks.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now