HTPC Credentials - Local Media Playback and Video Processing

Evaluation of local media playback and video processing is done by playing back files encompassing a range of relevant codecs, containers, resolutions, and frame rates. A note of the efficiency is also made by tracking GPU usage and power consumption of the system at the wall. Users have their own preference for the playback software / decoder / renderer, and our aim is to have numbers representative of commonly encountered scenarios. Towards this, we played back the test streams using the following combinations:

  • MPC-HC x64 1.8.5 + LAV Video Decoder (DXVA2 Native) + Enhanced Video Renderer - Custom Presenter (EVR-CP)
  • MPC-HC x64 1.8.5 + LAV Video Decoder (D3D11) + madVR 0.92.17 (DXVA-Focused)
  • MPC-HC x64 1.8.5 + LAV Video Decoder (D3D11) + madVR 0.92.17 (Lanczos-Focused)
  • VLC 3.0.6
  • Kodi 18.1

The thirteen test streams (each of 90s duration) were played back from the local disk with an interval of 30 seconds in-between. Various metrics including GPU usage and at-wall power consumption were recorded during the course of this playback. Prior to looking at the metrics, a quick summary of the decoding capabilities of the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 is useful to have for context.

The GPU supports hardware accelerated decoding of all popular codecs, including VP9 Profile 2.

All our playback tests were done with the desktop HDR setting turned on. It is possible for certain system configurations to have madVR automatically turn on/off the HDR capabilities prior to the playback of a HDR video, but, we didn't take advantage of that in our testing.

VLC and Kodi

VLC is the playback software of choice for the average PC user who doesn't need a ten-foot UI. Its install-and-play simplicity has made it extremely popular. Over the years, the software has gained the ability to take advantage of various hardware acceleration options. Kodi, on the other hand, has a ten-foot UI making it the perfect open-source software for dedicated HTPCs. Support for add-ons make it very extensible and capable of customization. We played back our test files using the default VLC and Kodi configurations, and recorded the following metrics.

Video Playback Efficiency - VLC and Kodi

A comparison of the above two graphs for the VP9.2 stream shows that VLC doesn't use hardware accelerated decode for the stream, while Kodi does. With hardware acceleration enabled the system is able to play back all the streams while consuming less than 25W. That said, in general, it appears that Kodi is more power-efficient compared to VLC.

MPC-HC

MPC-HC offers an easy way to test out different combinations of decoders and renderers. The first configuration we evaluated is the default post-install scenario, with only the in-built LAV Video Decoder forced to DXVA2 Native mode. Two additional passes were done with different madVR configurations. In the first one (DXVA-focused), we configured madVR to make use of the DXVA-accelerated video processing capabilities as much as possible. In the second (Lanczos-focused), the image scaling algorithms were set to 'Lanczos 3-tap, with anti-ringing checked'. Chroma upscaling was configured to be 'BiCubic 75 with anti-ringing checked' in both cases. The metrics collected during the playback of the test files using the above three configurations are presented below.

Video Playback Efficiency - MPC-HC with EVR-CP and madVR

The GPU is able to handle the madVR DXVA configuration, but, the D3D loading jumps above 90% for most streams in the Lanczos configuration. As expected, the NUC8i7BEH is not the system to choose if high-end customized video processing is required. The GPU is simply not up to the task. That said, there is likely no other system with a similar form-factor that can perform better than the Bean Canyon NUC for this particular task.

HTPC Credentials - YouTube and Netflix Streaming Miscellaneous Aspects and Concluding Remarks
Comments Locked

81 Comments

View All Comments

  • imaheadcase - Sunday, April 7, 2019 - link

    Why would you compare to a laptop. This isn't even for that market, its for Home Media/dumb computer you never look at.
  • Samus - Thursday, April 4, 2019 - link

    Man this thing is a beast. It's practically the same speed as my brand new full size desktop (Core i5-9400)
  • DimeCadmium - Thursday, April 4, 2019 - link

    Umm, what? There aren't currently any Atom NUCs and the Bean Canyons are half a year old.
  • Pisi - Thursday, April 4, 2019 - link

    Haven't been able to find this RAM (G.Skill RipjawsV F4-3000C16-16GRS DDR4 SODIMM) anywhere. Are you sure there's no typo involved?
  • eastcoast_pete - Thursday, April 4, 2019 - link

    Ganesh, thanks for including the HTPC-relevant tests and benchmarks in the review. Many (most?) NUCs end up serving as HTPCs, and that information is key for selecting the right one.
  • DroidTomTom - Friday, April 5, 2019 - link

    I wish someone made one with 3 HDMI outputs and high quality analog audio (Note after 2015 even so so quality analog audio is hard to find in these, have to tie up a USB port for external audio). Only need a Core i3 and 8GB of RAM and 256GB SSD would be fine.
  • fackamato - Saturday, April 6, 2019 - link

    Most people either use an AVR (audio via HDMI) or a DAC, why on earth would you want good onboard audio?
  • bill44 - Saturday, April 6, 2019 - link

    “Unfortunately, stereoscopic 3D is not supported in this configuration.”
    Are there any DP 1.2 or TB3 to HDMI adapter/converter that works with FP 3D?

    Also, why not Titan Ridge controller with DP 1.4?
  • Naxxy - Sunday, April 7, 2019 - link

    Did the 3000 mhz ram work just like that?? I have the Intel NUC8i7BEH and i first bought 16gb Ballistix Sport DDR4 @ 2666 and there was no way to boot the system...... had to switch to 2400mhz ram.....
    Talked to an Intel support and they told me that having no XMP profiles that NUC would only work with ram up to 2400.
  • Mr0czny - Friday, April 26, 2019 - link

    Im also interested cause im going to replace desktop to this NUC 8i5 ...

    does 3200 MHz ram add some performance or advantages are negligible

    And does it works without problems like Naxxy wrote

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now