Manufacturers of SSDs have traditionally sold drives with a PCIe interface at a premium when compared to devices featuring a SATA interface because of higher performance and despite of the fact that most SATA SSDs use drive form-factor and are more expensive to make than M.2 modules. Later this year Kingston plans to launch its A2000-series SSDs featuring a PCIe 3.0 x4 interface that will be priced below SATA SSDs.

The Kingston A2000-series drives will be offered in various controller/NAND configurations in a bid to be flexible in terms of BOM costs and ensure that the SSDs are consistently cheaper than solutions featuring a SATA interface. In particular, Kingston plans to use Silicon Motion’s SM2263-series and Phison’s low-cost controllers along with Toshiba’s BiCS4 3D TLC NAND memory for these drives.

Kingston’s A2000 SSDs will be offered in 240 GB, 480 GB, and 960 GB configurations, which is in line with other low-cost SSDs. As for performance, the manufacturer targets up to a 2000 MB/s sequential read speed as well as up to a 1500 MB/s sequential write speed. A prototype Kingston A2000 512 GB SSD that Kingston demonstrated at CES offered up to a 1986 MB/s sequential read speed as well as an up to a 1572 MB/s sequential write speed. Such performance levels are typical for SMI’s SM2263XT/SM2263 controllers, so these results are not too surprising. Meanwhile, we are looking forward to see official test results of another version of the A2000.

Kingston says that performance of A2000 drives featuring different controllers will be consistent, so end-users will not have to wonder which SSD they are buying, but this claim will have to be verified by independent testing.

Comparison of Kingston's Client NVMe SSDs
Capacity A2000 A1000 KC2000 KC1000
240 - 960 GB 240 - 960 GB 240 TB ~ 2 TB 240 - 960 GB
Controller Silicon Motion
Phison
Phison PS5008-E8 Silicon Motion Phison PS5007-E7
NAND Flash Toshiba's 96-layer BiCS4 3D TLC Toshiba's 256 Gb 64-layer BiCS3 3D TLC 3D TLC Toshiba's 128 Gb planar MLC
Form-Factor, Interface M.2-2280, PCIe 3.0 x4 M.2-2280, PCIe 3.0 x2, NVMe 1.2 M.2-2280, PCIe 3.0 x4 M.2-2280, PCIe 3.0 x4, NVMe 1.1
Sequential Read Up to 2000 MB/s Up to 1500 MB/s Up to 3000 MB/s Up to 2700 MB/s
Sequential Write Up to 1500 MB/s  Up to 1000 MB/s Up to 2500 MB/s Up to 1600 MB/s
Random Read IOPS ? Up to 120K IOPS ? Up to 290K IOPS
Random Write IOPS ? Up to 100K IOPS ? Up to 190K IOPS

While Kingston demonstrated prototypes of its A2000 -series SSDs at CES, it is not clear when the company intends to ship the final drives. While we do know for sure that Kingston wants to make its A2000-series PCIe SSDs cheaper than SATA SSDs, it still remains to be seen what they will be priced at, especially with NAND prices continuing to fluctuate as the weeks go by.

Related Reading:

Source: Kingston

POST A COMMENT

16 Comments

View All Comments

  • eastcoast_pete - Sunday, January 20, 2019 - link

    Maybe I overlooked it, but the article doesn't mention if it's DRAM-less or not. Given the targeted price range, I assume it is. Since that means that it'll use system memory to cache, is that why it needs 4 PCI-3 lanes to get the speed the demo showed? Reply
  • danielfranklin - Sunday, January 20, 2019 - link

    I would certainly assume it is.
    Not sure if the bandwidth would help, i imagine the issue is more latency than bandwidth, the caching is used more for page lockups than actual data caching i thought.
    Reply
  • The_Assimilator - Sunday, January 20, 2019 - link

    Couldja rather make SATA SSDs cheaper, Kingston? Reply
  • Flunk - Monday, January 21, 2019 - link

    You seem to have missed the point here. SATA SSDs are more expensive to build than NVMe ones, Kingston is relying on that to make these drives cheaper. Without that, they wouldn't be cheaper, egro asking for cheaper SATA SSDs based on this announcement is magical thinking. Reply
  • The_Assimilator - Tuesday, January 22, 2019 - link

    > SATA SSDs are more expensive to build than NVMe ones

    That hasn't been true so far in the industry, as NVMe controllers' prices have inflated the BOM cost of those drives above that of SATA drives. If the newer NVMe controllers are cheap enough to bring the NVMe BOM cost down to below SATA, that's a good thing, but it still doesn't change the fact that space and heat constraints preclude higher-capacity drives in the NVMe form-factor. We don't need cheaper small-capacity NVMe drives, we need cheaper high-capacity SATA drives.
    Reply
  • Gunbuster - Monday, January 21, 2019 - link

    Kingston we still remember the after press review NAND switcharoo you pulled.

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/7763/an-update-to-k...
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now