Final Words

The Surface Go sits in a somewhat interesting segment of the market. The base model has a price that’s low enough to be considered a value proposition, but like all value devices, there’s compromise to get there. The $399 starting price includes just 4 GB of RAM, and 64 GB of eMMC storage, which is outright the bare minimum that would even be usable with Windows 10. Microsoft now offers a 4 GB model with the 128 GB SSD for $499, which is already a price that’s creeping out of the value segment. 8 GB of RAM is $549, which is a lot for a low-end device. If you want to add LTE, the price starts at $679 with 8 GB of RAM and 128 GB of storage, and business customers will be able to purchase a 256 GB model as well. Then you must add in the price of the Type Cover, which starts at $99, and is realistically a required accessory.

A model with 8 GB of RAM and the Type Cover is therefore about $650, or a bit more if you choose a Signature Type Cover. That’s a lot more than the $399 get-you-in-the-door price, and really moves the Surface Go up a couple of rungs on the pricing ladder.

But the Surface Go does have some very good qualities going for it. The build quality is certainly a step above anything else in this price range on the PC side, with a fantastic magnesium body, a built-in kickstand which is every bit as good as the Surface Pro’s, and a very light weight. Even with the Type Cover attached, the device still only weighs 767 grams, or about 1.7 lbs, and coupled with the small size, makes the Surface Go extremely portable. Add in the fact that it works with the Surface Pen, and you can see an easy use case in a small, but expensive, note taking machine.

Microsoft also color calibrates all of its displays, and you would be hard pressed to find anything else in the PC space at this price range with as accurate of a display. The Go’s display isn’t the highest density one around, but at 216 pixels-per-inch, it still offers great clarity, and good contrast as well. Microsoft offers better displays on some of its other devices, but this is still a high quality display and very pleasing to use.

However, there’s some drawbacks as well. At the introductory price of $399, the underwhelming performance fits in with much of the competition, where Intel’s Atom is the name of the game. Despite Microsoft moving to a Core-based Pentium in the Surface Go, it’s disappointing to see where it stacks up: more or less even in terms of CPU performance with Intel’s latest Atom processor. At $399, that’s kind of expected, but since most people should buy the model with 8 GB of RAM, and a Type Cover, all of a sudden the Pentium Gold kind of looks out of place in a $650 PC. The performance is well above the previous non-Pro Surface 3 tablet, but the expectations have also progressed.

We’ve already touched on this, but this is a tough spot in the market for companies to try to launch quality devices for less money. Intel has a stranglehold on the market, and has taken the stance that Core branded products are sacred. Its margins must be protected. AMD doesn’t really offer anything that would compete in terms of power usage, and Qualcomm doesn’t offer anything in terms of performance. If Intel offered even a modest amount of Turbo on the Pentium Gold range, it would help tremendously, but they don’t. It’s an unfortunate spot to be in today.

The other real drawback is the battery life, which really comes down to battery capacity. At 27 Wh, there’s just no way the Surface Go can ever really be expected to provide a full day of work out of a single charge, and on a device this portable, that’s a drawback. This is why it is great to see USB-C on the Surface Go. Microsoft has never really supported this connector, but if there was a single device where it makes sense, it is this one. The Surface Connect charger is a convenient method of magnetically connecting a charger on your desk, but being able to charge off of a USB-C charger slightly mitigates the battery concerns, and would even allow a power back to be attached if necessary.

What was a great move though was coming out with this LTE model. Yes, you can always tether a laptop to a phone’s cellular connection over Wi-Fi, but for those that need something that’s always connected, that’s not the ideal solution. Having built-in LTE really expands the use cases for the Surface Go, especially in business. Having employees being able to be mobile, but still being able to manage their PCs, is an appealing draw. This is definitely not a feature everyone needs, and the $130 price increase, plus the monthly data fee, strikes that point home. But for those that need it, this is invaluable.


Source: AdDuplex.com

Despite the performance and battery life, Surface Go looks to be a bit of a hit, with a usage share already higher than many Surface devices that have been on the market longer. Clearly the small size and good build quality is something people are looking for. Adding LTE to that increases the mobility further, and although Microsoft likely won’t sell more LTE models than WI-FI, it definitely increases the potential market. And, despite the Surface Go being priced at a premium for a small form factor convertible tablet, it is still priced well under the entry level Surface Pro 6. The Pro 6 offers much higher performance, a bigger, nicer display, better battery life, and a keyboard that doesn’t feel cramped. But the Surface Go is smaller, lighter, and less expensive. With already 12% of the Surface usage share, that appears to be a winning formula.

Wireless, Audio, Thermals, and Software
Comments Locked

79 Comments

View All Comments

  • Impulses - Thursday, January 17, 2019 - link

    Huh, battery life isn't quite as bad as I thought it was, definitely well under average for the price but I'm still kind of attracted to the unique combination of form factor and capabilities... I don't need a full fledged laptop, but if I'm gonna carry around a convertible like this I'd definitely appreciate x86 compatibility and ease of storage handling vs something like a Chromebook or iPad.

    How fast can it charge via USB-C?
  • Archwizard Snim - Thursday, January 17, 2019 - link

    I personally checked that USB-PD charging for Surface Go reaches 20V/1A at least, which I think is limited by my cable and charger (or portable battery, for that matter). I once read that the maximum power that goes through the USB-C port is 45W.

    Even with 20W portable power, however, it's fast enough and doesn't lose the battery even under heavy use. I never even had to worry about battery at all since I always carried the portable USB-PD compliant battery with me.
  • Smell This - Thursday, January 17, 2019 - link

    For reference (and snits and giggles ... )
    The Bay Trail Preview: Intel Atom Z3770 Tested
    https://www.anandtech.com/show/7314/intel-baytrail...
  • Konservenknilch - Thursday, January 17, 2019 - link

    I have the non-LTE version (SSD), very neat little device. Sure, it's not a desktop replacement like its larger siblings, but wonderfully portable and quite speedy.
  • PeachNCream - Thursday, January 17, 2019 - link

    Interesting design. Screen bezels don't bother me. Thermal throttling, on the other hand, is an annoyance so I'd happily give up short burst performance for a more consistent experience even if that consistency is considerably slower as a result. That battery life though...I question how the words "unmatched mobility" can be given serious consideration alongside a device that can't even run as long as an old Atom n270-based netbook.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Saturday, January 19, 2019 - link

    The short bursts you dislike help to maintain higher battery life numbers. Running slower over a longer period can often wind up using more power in the long run, its why intel started prioritizing turbo boost in the first place.
  • drexnx - Thursday, January 17, 2019 - link

    intel needs to stop being ridiculous with their segmentation and let the lower end core stuff turbo in some way, otherwise their (now excellent) atoms will walk all over the bigger cores as we see here
  • Eris_Floralia - Thursday, January 17, 2019 - link

    It's hilarious to see Gemini Lake beats Pentium-Y at the same TDP.

    Lakefield's gonna be very interesting in this area.

    Same goes to their Tremont Atoms, if they don't put gimped iGPU in it anymore.

    Hopefully AMD is catching up with their newer optimized Raven Ridge.
  • cpkennit83 - Thursday, January 17, 2019 - link

    I assume Gemini at 2.4ghz must be drawing more power than kaby lake at 1.6ghz in the single threaded tests. The 1.6ghz no turbo harness is retarded and even being a lower bin, kaby must be very frugal so far from its upper potential limits.
  • The_Assimilator - Friday, January 18, 2019 - link

    > Lakefield's gonna be very interesting in this area.

    Oh yes. Lakefield absolutely cannot come soon enough.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now