Far Cry 5 (DX11)

The latest title in Ubisoft's Far Cry series lands us right into the unwelcoming arms of an armed militant cult in Montana, one of the many middles-of-nowhere in the United States. With a charismatic and enigmatic adversary, gorgeous landscapes of the northwestern American flavor, and lots of violence, it is classic Far Cry fare. Graphically intensive in an open-world environment, the game mixes in action and exploration.

Far Cry 5 does support Vega-centric features with Rapid Packed Math and Shader Intrinsics. Far Cry 5 also supports HDR (HDR10, scRGB, and FreeSync 2). This testing was done without HD Textures enabled, a new option that was recently patched in.

Far Cry 5 - 3840x2160 - Ultra QualityFar Cry 5 - 2560x1440 - Ultra QualityFar Cry 5 - 1920x1080 - Ultra Quality

Once again, the RTX 2060 (6GB) slots in neatly between the GTX 1070 Ti and GTX 1080, useful given that the GTX 1070 Ti only had a slim lead on the RX Vega 56.

As for the high resolution texture pack, Far Cry 5 released a free 29GB patch adding toggleable HD Textures, and it's something we'll want to look into as we investigate VRAM limitations. Generally, high-resolution texture packs are a simple way of increasing visual fidelity without significantly hurting framerates, provided the card has enough framebuffer.

Battlefield 1 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
Comments Locked

134 Comments

View All Comments

  • dave_the_nerd - Monday, January 7, 2019 - link

    Selfish opinion: but I really would have appreciated a 970 in the graph, in addition to the 1060. (Only two generations old, same market segment and similar price point.)
  • CiccioB - Monday, January 7, 2019 - link

    Yes, also the 1080Ti is missing, and it is quite a pity, especially for the compute tests.
  • Icehawk - Tuesday, January 8, 2019 - link

    I wish they would show the 970 in tests too - partially because it was a popular card and most folks wait a couple of cycles to update and partially because that is what I have :) I would like to upgrade as it struggles at 4k and even 1440 on some of the latest games but I can’t stomach $500+
  • poohbear - Monday, January 7, 2019 - link

    Uhm, you didn't test for its RTX performance? Wasn't that the main contention with a GTX 2060????
  • boozed - Monday, January 7, 2019 - link

    Still waiting for real-world tests?
  • saiga6360 - Tuesday, January 8, 2019 - link

    Battlefield V? Crappy game but it does have ray tracing implemented.
  • RamIt - Monday, January 7, 2019 - link

    This card is worth no more than $199 us dollars. Sorry Nvidia your pricing stricture keeps me from buying your products from now on.
  • RamIt - Monday, January 7, 2019 - link

    Sorry for the typos. A little bit hammered at the moment but certainly mean what I implied.
  • mkaibear - Tuesday, January 8, 2019 - link

    Don't you buy on price/performance then? That seems odd.

    For the price this offers great performance.
  • sing_electric - Tuesday, January 8, 2019 - link

    There's a lot of good value at ~$200 (RX 580, 1060 6GB since prices are being dragged down by the 2060), and then essentially nothing worth buying until the 2060 at $350, and then nothing until the 2070. (You could make a case for a Vega 64 on sale for $350, but even then, it's more power-hungry, etc.).

    So if GPU performance is important, and your budget can accommodate a $250-400 GPU, the 2060 is the one to buy. People can complain about $350 being a "high end" price, but the fact is, it's WAY faster than what you get for spending say, $280 on an RX 590.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now