Battery Life

The iPhone XS comes with a 2658mAh/10.13Wh battery, while the XS Max has a capacity of 3174mAh/12.08Wh. Again, it’s to be noted that although both phones are quite large form-factor devices by now, Apple’s battery density still largely lags behind the competition. While yes, it’s true that the XS Max’ battery is the biggest that Apple has ever used, it still pales in comparison to the 3500 to 4000mAh that other vendors now employ in the same form-factor.

As we saw in the SPEC analysis, the one advantage that Apple has is an enormous lead in terms of power efficiency of its SoC, which largely makes up for any gap in the battery capacity deficit.

Our web browsing test is a mixed-to-heavy workload that iterates through a set of popular webpages that are hosted on our server. The test loads a web page, pauses, scrolls through it, pauses, and then continues to the next in the set, repeating all over when done. Brightness is fixed at 200cd/m².

Web Browsing Battery Life 2016 (WiFi)

The iPhone XS saw a very slight degradation compared to the iPhone X in our test. The 19 minute deficit isn’t terrible, but it does come at a surprise given that Apple had promised improved battery life for the new model. What’s happening is that likely our test is a tad heavier in its workload than what Apple and many other vendors internally test to advertise as the daily battery life of their devices.

The iPhone XS Max came in at 10.3h. Again while this is still good, it’s a degradation over the 11.83h of the iPhone 8 Plus. Here it’s easier to rationalise the difference; the OLED screen of the XS Max is just more power hungry and also has a larger area than the iPhone 8 Plus. Here the increased battery capacity isn’t enough to counteract the panel’s increased needs.

As to why the iPhone XS saw a degradation over the X, I’m not too sure. I did rerun the test on the iPhone X to make sure iOS12 hadn’t impacted the devices – and I got a runtime just 10 minutes lower than what I had tested on the iPhone X back around in January, so the iOS upgrade certainly doesn’t seem to have affected the battery life.

It should be relatively safe to assume that the new A12 should be more efficient in its workloads, even with the increased performance that it brings. One thing that we can’t really verify is the power efficiency at intermediate performance states, as that’s also where CPUs perform a lot of their work at.

We also have to keep in mind the connectivity factor: the new iPhone’s seems to sport a new Broadcom BCM4377 WiFi combo chip which we don’t know much about. Most importantly the new XS have also switched over from a Qualcomm baseband (in our test unit of the iPhone X) to a new Intel XMM7560 baseband.

I’ve generally given up on LTE testing after a few years ago I had run into some serious issues regarding a misconfiguration of my mobile carriers’ baseband stations as they did not have CDRX enabled. This caused an almost 20-30% battery life degradation on Huawei’s devices – and if I hadn’t debugged the issue with HiSilicon I’d probably be none the wiser. Fact is, cellular battery life testing is a lot harder than one would think, and without having a controlled environment, I’m very hesitant to resume cellular battery life testing.

That being said, I will revisit the iPhone X vs iPhone XS battery life topic while on LTE over the weekend and post an update to the review.

Overall, the battery life of the iPhone XS and XS Max are good – they don’t quite reach Apple’s claimed improvements, but that also just might be something that will vary from use-case to use-case.

Display Measurement & Power Camera - Daylight Evaluation: Zoom and Scenic
Comments Locked

253 Comments

View All Comments

  • Constructor - Wednesday, October 10, 2018 - link

    Multicore A12 performance seems mostly limited by the passive cooling in a handheld device. That is where the much higher power availability and active cooling in a notebook or desktop makes the biggest difference.

    It's single-core performance where you see the most of the actual core performance. By allowing for higher power consumption and using active cooling Apple should be able to scale up multicore performance relatively easily (and some of the iPads with additional CPU cores, notebook-sized batteries and at least improved passive cooling have already demonstrated that).
  • zeeBomb - Monday, October 8, 2018 - link

    Andrei came thru...thank you!!!
  • zeeBomb - Monday, October 8, 2018 - link

    Does anyone here still use a seperate camera app for Night time photos instead of the stock one? Like NightCap Pro, etc.
  • tmi_(') - Monday, October 8, 2018 - link

    Andrei, nice analysis!
    can you write something about new storage controller in A12?
  • strajk - Tuesday, October 9, 2018 - link

    -"Apple’s CPU have gotten so performant now, that we’re just margins off the best desktop CPUs"
    That sentence alone discredits your whole article, this has to be one of the most stupid things I've ever read in a review the past years.
    A mobile ARM CPU isn't even faster than a Pentium 4 in pure IPC, and they perform in completely different instruction sets...

    That statement was so moronic that it forced me to create an account just to call you out on this.
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Tuesday, October 9, 2018 - link

    > this has to be one of the most stupid things I've ever read in a review the past years.

    Did this cause you to write something even more stupid in the following sentence?

    > A mobile ARM CPU isn't even faster than a Pentium 4 in pure IPC

    The P4's IPC was overtaken by mobile devices maybe half a decade ago. That's such a ridiculous claim.

    > and they perform in completely different instruction sets...

    So what? How is that relevant? The same high language workloads are compiled for the respective ISAs. Please do explain how that is not comparable.
  • Boxador - Wednesday, October 10, 2018 - link

    Andrei, keep kicking ass. This review and your comment responses are fire.
  • tipoo - Thursday, October 18, 2018 - link


    People who deny that ARM designs especially from Apple have closed in on x86 performance, and in Apples case often beaten it, are starting to remind me of flat earthers.
  • Silma - Friday, October 12, 2018 - link

    Regarding processor power.
    Apart from gamers, is the increase in processing power perceptible to the user, for which applications and is it noticeable?
    I have a 2.5 year old phone with a SnaDragon 810 and its performances still suit me just fine. In a future purchase, I would mostly look for improvements on battery autonomy.
  • tipoo - Wednesday, October 24, 2018 - link

    I thought a Core 2 Duo felt fine until I got a Haswell system, I suspect it would be similar for you going to this. The improvement just in web page loading speed alone would be significant.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now