Video

Recommendation: 256MB PowerColor Radeon 9800XT (412MHz), DVI, TV-out
Price: $415 shipped



As we mentioned in a previous guide, ATI has had a firm grasp on the add-in desktop video market for quite some time now. While ATI's lead is quite noticeable at the low end and fairly noticeable with the mid-range sector, their lead in cutting edge isn't quite as drastic. It's still there, as even AnandTech has concluded that the 9800XT is more or less the fastest desktop gaming GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) currently available. Still, NVIDIA's 5950 Ultra closely trails the 9800XT (more on the 5950 in a moment) enough in current games in terms of speed and IQ (image quality) that it's pretty clear the 9800XT is the superior cutting edge product. That's why we recommend it today, with the manufacturer, PowerColor, yet again. With this card, you get DVI (if you have an LCD), TV-out, and 256MB of memory. The 256MB of memory will come in very handy with future DX9 titles, though not for quite some time. Overall, you're getting an incredible gaming card here. However, if you're curious about how to save a little cash without sacrificing much performance, we suggest that you check out a 128MB 9800 Pro (from any manufacturer you choose) for about $215 shipped. It contains half the memory (128MB instead of 256MB), which may hurt performance a little, but won't be at all noticeable in current games, and is only on average about 5%-10% slower in current games.

Runner-up: 256MB Leadtek GeForce FX 5950 Ultra, DVI/VIVO
Price: $390



The GeForce FX 5950 isn't quite as fast as ATI's 9800XT video cards nor is the IQ as good in current games, but where NVIDIA has done a good job is pricing. On average, 9800XT cards are $40 more than their GeForce FX 5950 competition. For a slight performance edge, that's not a small amount of cash. True, this isn't a video card for a budget system, this is for a cutting edge system, and so $40 may be insignificant in the grand scheme of things. Still, it's something to ponder if you have a certain dollar amount you don't want to exceed with this system. Anyway, Leadtek manufacturers the particular GeForce FX 5950 that we're recommending here today. We like this model's cooling configuration/style, bundled software, Leadtek support, and features like VIVO and DVI.

We'd be remiss not to mention that several high-end video cards will be launched in a couple months that should end up being considerably faster than the Radeon 9800XT and GeForce FX 5950 Ultra. Therefore, if you do not have an urgent need to build your system, we suggest waiting for the release of these new high-end video cards. It's not the end of the world if you build your high-end system today with a 9800XT or 5950 Ultra, both cards offer tremendous performance in today's video games and most future games. However, just be aware that something will come along in a couple months that will be much faster for the same price or less, depending on exactly what models are launched.

Monitor

Recommendation: Samsung 1100DF 21" (20" viewable) DynaFlat CRT
Price: $420 shipped



Not only does Samsung make a great mid-range monitor with their 955DF series, they make a great high-end monitor with their 1100DF series too. The 1100DF is capable of refresh rates of 75Hz at 2048x1536 and 85Hz at 1280x1024 and has a dot pitch of 0.20mm. Text clarity is very impressive, glare is non-existent, and gaming performance is top-of-the-line.

Runner-up: Philips 22" (20" viewable) 202P45 CRT
Price: $497 shipped



The 202P45 may cost $80 more, but its performance is nothing short of outstanding. The 202P45 has features like a max resolution of 2048x1536 @ 80Hz (1600x1200 @ 85Hz) and a 0.25mm dot pitch aperture grille. The aperture grille is what makes this monitor particularly special. Going by its word for word definition, the aperture grille is a series of vertical wires stretched vertically down the inside of a CRT to mask the beams from the electron guns at the back of the tube. What the 202P45's flat aperture grille essentially does is help to minimize the geometric distortion that users will see on increasingly larger screens, like this 22" monitor. With this feature, the 202P45 is basically able to display a more precise and accurate picture with sharp overall text clarity compared to monitors without flat aperture grille technology. Because of this feature, the 202P45 is truly one of the best 22" monitors on the market that doesn't force you to take out a second mortgage on the house.

Memory picks... Computer Case pick...
Comments Locked

41 Comments

View All Comments

  • agent2099 - Thursday, March 4, 2004 - link

    You need to recommend a "OS" drive, as well as a storage drive. I don't think having just a 36GB drive is practical these days. You could have said 36/74GB Raptor for the OS, and perhaps a WD or Seagate 120-200GB drive for storage.

    Also, no LCD recommendation?
  • buleyb - Wednesday, March 3, 2004 - link

    why no high end LCDs? boooo
  • TrogdorJW - Wednesday, March 3, 2004 - link

    I lost my post due to some network issues earlier, but I was going to mention that the final price table, while correct, might be better if you pulled the $55 power supply out of the case listing, or at the very least showed the price of the case and power supply as $125 and not $70. Adding up the right column comes up $55 short of the total, and the "$55 for power supply" in the case text isn't that clear. Also, no alternative recommendations for the case or power supply? What gives? I guess Antec is the best PS manufacturer.... [Dons flame-retardant suit.]
  • TrogdorJW - Wednesday, March 3, 2004 - link

    #17, I'm pretty sure that's what they plan for the "Overclocker's System". Buy moderate priced parts and overclock for extra performance.

    Anyway, if you're really looking at that price range, here's what I would change from this high-end system:

    1) Drop the CPU to an Athlon 3000+/3200+ to save $150 to almost $200.

    2) Drop the graphics card to the Radeon 9800 Pro to save $200.

    3) Do you need the monitor? If so, go with a 19" instead of 21" to save another $200.

    4) I would really recommend going with one large 160GB hard drive instead of two Raptors. Performance won't be as good, but I personally have about 60GB of files in just my GAMES folder! With movies, MP3s, etc. plus applications and Windows itself, I have about 140GB of data on my hard drives. Two Raptors just isn't going to cut it, especially with their cost.
  • joey2264 - Wednesday, March 3, 2004 - link

    First of all, I want to say that I object to anandtech saying that my hotmail account is not a real account just because many others have abused that particular name. If they want to block it, that is fine, but to tell someone to get a real account when thousands of people use hotmail is just absurd.

    I just wanted to mention in this forum, that I really liked the three guides that have been produced so far, but I would really like if Anandtech made a fourth one in between the "mid-range" and the "high-end" guides. maybe in the range of $1500-1600 (this is how much that I want to spend on my system) I'm sure that there are a lot of people who are weary of spending $2200+, but who are also not looking to have a bargain basement system. Thanks
  • Cygni - Wednesday, March 3, 2004 - link

    I dont really understand the point of anything above DDR400 on A64 based system, personally...
  • Pumpkinierre - Wednesday, March 3, 2004 - link

    Why did you pick the Abit IC7-G for your P4 mobo option. In the AT memory articles, AT(Wesley) uses the Asus P4C800-E deluxe which is also the only m'board suitable for DDR550 from Corsair and OCZ (http://www.anandtech.com/memory/showdoc.html?i=197... In other benchmarking articles, AT uses an ordinary Intel mobo also regarded as stable.
    I dont mind I've got an IC7-G and have found it quite stable under stressful conditions. However, both AT and others have said in the past that IC7s have memory stability issues, so I'm intrigued to know why you selected the ABIT over the ASUS for a system where stability has high priority?
  • yc6489 - Wednesday, March 3, 2004 - link

    Why not the universally acclaimed Z-680 for the speakers? Also I would go with the NEC/Mitsubishi FP2141SB-BK for the monitor.
  • Abraxas - Wednesday, March 3, 2004 - link

    i have sennheiser hd500s that i got from amazon for 65 bucks 2 years ago. great headphones, shitty cable... had to replace the cable once about 18 months ago for 12 bucks shipped, and its going out again as well. bad habit of chewing the cable as i play cs :)
  • KristopherKubicki - Wednesday, March 3, 2004 - link

    Headphones: Sennheiser HD600s :) Better than anything you could buy - albeit you wont exactly be able to share what youre lisetning too.

    Grados are good too though - i have a few pairs.

    Kristopher

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now