Test Setup

Rather than benchmarking with the FX51 we had been using, we decided to switch over to a more mainstream (but still very fast) Athlon 64 3400+ platform. We are trying to standardize our benchmarking components in order to keep our numbers comparable between articles. This setup is another step closer to our goals of standardization.

 Performance Test Configuration
Processor(s): AMD Athlon 64 3400+
Motherboard: FIC K8-800T (VIA K8T800 Chipset)
RAM: 2 x 512Mb OCZ 3500 Platinum Ltd
Hard Drive: Seagate 120GB 7200RPM PATA (8MB Buffer)
Operating System: Windows XP Professional SP1
Video Drivers: ATI CATALYST 4.1
NVIDIA ForceWare 53.03

This is the first graphics review that we've done with the new ATI drivers. As a side note, we didn't see any major performance gains in anything, though there were slight improvements in some OpenGL games. We haven't done an in-depth study on the driver yet, and if there is anything interesting or exciting that pops up, we'll be sure to write about it. In addition, all overclocking is performed using Powerstrip (even though some vendors include their own overclocking tools).

And now the moment we've all been waiting for: the performance tests.

Core Temperatures ATI Radeon 9800 Performance
Comments Locked

44 Comments

View All Comments

  • Icewind - Wednesday, February 4, 2004 - link

    Were are the comparison charts between the overclocked and stock speed 9800pro's? I must be blind, because I can't see them.
  • par - Wednesday, February 4, 2004 - link

    Where can I find the passively cooled 9600XT by sapphire? Newegg shows sapphires 9600xt with a fan.
  • DerekWilson - Wednesday, February 4, 2004 - link

    The Seagate HD: Barracuda 7200.7 PATA ... I'll add that to the table
  • mostlyprudent - Wednesday, February 4, 2004 - link

    Nice article. A passively cooled 9600XT?!...I've found my next video card. There is one thing that I am unclear about - the Seagate hard drive used in the test setup - is it an SATA drive?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now