The ASRock Z270 Gaming-ITX/ac Review

Test Bed and Setup

Readers of our motherboard review section will have noted the trend in modern motherboards to implement a form of MultiCore Enhancement / Acceleration / Turbo (read our report here) on their motherboards. This does several things, including better benchmark results at stock settings (not entirely needed if overclocking is an end-user goal) at the expense of heat and temperature. It also gives, in essence, an automatic overclock which may be against what the user wants. Our testing methodology is ‘out-of-the-box’, with the latest public BIOS installed and XMP enabled, and thus subject to the whims of this feature. It is ultimately up to the motherboard manufacturer to take this risk – and manufacturers taking risks in the setup is something they do on every product (think C-state settings, USB priority, DPC Latency/monitoring priority, overriding memory sub-timings at JEDEC). Processor speed change is part of that risk, and ultimately if no overclocking is planned, some motherboards will affect how fast that shiny new processor goes and can be an important factor in the system build.

The ASRock Z270 Gaming-ITX/ac is one of the few motherboards that we have reviewed recently that has multi-core acceleration disabled by default. The FCLK frequency is set to 800 MHz by default as well and all current/temperature limiters are enabled and set to their default settings.

Test Setup
Processor Intel Core i7-7700K (ES, Retail Stepping), 91W, $340
4 Cores, 8 Threads, 4.2 GHz (4.5 GHz Turbo)
Motherboards ECS Z270H4-I Durathon 2
Cooling Alphacool Eisbaer 240
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i Platinum PSU
Memory G.Skill DDR4-2400 C15 2x16 GB 1.2V
Memory Settings XMP @ 2400
Video Cards MSI GTX 770 Lightning 2GB (1150/1202 Boost)
Hard Drive Crucial MX200 1TB
Case Open Test Bed
Operating System Windows 7 64-bit SP1

Thank you to Crucial for providing us with MX200 SSDs. Crucial stepped up to the plate as our benchmark list grows larger with newer benchmarks and titles, and the 1TB MX200 units are strong performers. Based on Marvell's 88SS9189 controller and using Micron's 16nm 128Gbit MLC flash, these are 7mm high, 2.5-inch drives rated for 100K random read IOPs and 555/500 MB/s sequential read and write speeds. The 1TB models we are using here support TCG Opal 2.0 and IEEE-1667 (eDrive) encryption and have a 320TB rated endurance with a three-year warranty.

Further Reading: AnandTech's Crucial MX200 (250 GB, 500 GB & 1TB) Review

Thank you to Corsair for providing us with an AX1200i PSU. The AX1200i was the first power supply to offer digital control and management via Corsair's Link system, but under the hood it commands a 1200W rating at 50C with 80 PLUS Platinum certification. This allows for a minimum 89-92% efficiency at 115V and 90-94% at 230V. The AX1200i is completely modular, running the larger 200mm design, with a dual ball bearing 140mm fan to assist high-performance use. The AX1200i is designed to be a workhorse, with up to 8 PCIe connectors for suitable four-way GPU setups. The AX1200i also comes with a Zero RPM mode for the fan, which due to the design allows the fan to be switched off when the power supply is under 30% load.

Further Reading: AnandTech's Corsair AX1500i Power Supply Review

Thank you to G.Skill for providing us with memory. G.Skill has been a long-time supporter of AnandTech over the years, for testing beyond our CPU and motherboard memory reviews. We've reported on their high capacity and high-frequency kits, and every year at Computex G.Skill holds a world overclocking tournament with liquid nitrogen right on the show floor.

Further Reading: AnandTech's Memory Scaling on Haswell Review, with G.Skill DDR3-3000

Board Features and Overclocking BIOS
Comments Locked

41 Comments

View All Comments

  • GeorgeH - Tuesday, September 19, 2017 - link

    100-1 something is overheating and the board is just fine.
  • only1jv - Wednesday, September 20, 2017 - link

    that's what i figured, so i tried a different GPU, same result. I even swapped the PSU, same result. Swapped the memory, same result.

    The only thing i haven't swapped is the CPU but i'm running the Corsair H100i AIO watercooler and have never seen temps on it go above 70c.

    I figure it has to be the mobo itself because it would even lockup while in the BIOS.

    Oh and yes, i already requested an RMA. Just wanted to share my experience with this mobo after seeing this review and how after a few months it's now failing on me.
  • Ej24 - Wednesday, September 20, 2017 - link

    It was probably the VRM for delivering power to the cpu that was overheating causing the issue. There's no monitoring software for that so most people forget about it. Maybe you got some particularly hot chokes, mosfets, or caps that were just prone to overheating. At any rate, hope the RMA goes well.
  • sonny73n - Thursday, September 21, 2017 - link

    Last month I ran into the same problem but with Asus MB. Most of the time "clock_watchdog_timeout" error appeared when it froze. The weather then was about 100F in Southern Ca. CPU stock HSF replaced + case opened = problem solved.
  • The_Assimilator - Wednesday, September 20, 2017 - link

    Allow me to introduce you to this magical concept know as "RMA".
  • lucam - Wednesday, September 20, 2017 - link

    Still no iPad Pro review yet..:(
  • Beaver M. - Wednesday, September 20, 2017 - link

    I would really like to know why they removed 1 USB port at the IO panel.
    It was still there on the Z170 version.
    Also putting in WiFi as part of the board, that cant be removed, is not a good idea either. They might have saved some space on the board, but they didnt use it (for example more USB headers), and instead wasted space on the IO panel. Some people just dont need WiFi and/or Bluetooth.

    Also why doesnt AT test if the notorious ASRock USB problem with long or extended cables still exists, which could only be fixed by taking an non-Intel USB chip (either if one is on the board, or an extra PCIe card)? It has been known for at least 5 years...
  • DanNeely - Thursday, September 21, 2017 - link

    They probably used a cheaper 1x USB3.1g2 controller. A year or two ago I don't think that budget version was available yet.
  • bak0n - Thursday, September 21, 2017 - link

    I find it odd that they release it now, when the 370's are right around to corner. A bit late to the game for my taste.
  • mickulty - Thursday, September 21, 2017 - link

    The 87350D mosfets (actually "power blocks" integrating high and low sides) are actually supplied by TI - NexFET is the range that they're from.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now