Total War: Warhammer

The last game in our lineup is Total War: Warhammer, a DX11 game that received official DX12 support a couple months after launch. While DX12 is still marked as beta, Warhammer was to some extent developed with DX12 in mind, with preview builds showcasing DX12 performance.

The built-in benchmark was used with Ultra settings without alterations.

While the DX12 render path was used for AMD cards, there appear to be some oddities with 1080p performance. As mentioned earlier, we'd like to use the best performing API for a given card; in this case, while there was improved performance at higher resolutions, we noticed a potential regression in 1080p performance. Unfortunately, due to time constraints, we weren't able to investigate further; like Dawn of War III, it's possible Warhammer at 1080p was CPU-bound as well..

Total War: Warhammer - 3840x2160 - Ultra QualityTotal War: Warhammer - 2560x1440 - Ultra QualityTotal War: Warhammer - 1920x1080- Ultra Quality

Total War: Warhammer - 99th Percentile - 3840x2160 - Ultra QualityTotal War: Warhammer - 99th Percentile - 2560x1440 - Ultra QualityTotal War: Warhammer - 99th Percentile - 1920x1080 - Ultra Quality

F1 2016 Compute Performance
Comments Locked

213 Comments

View All Comments

  • TheinsanegamerN - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    Enough AMD fans will buy at inflated prices to make AMD some cold hard cash, then they will lower the price in 3 months.
  • Aldaris - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    It's still a competitor against the 1080.
  • mapesdhs - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    Not when it costs 100 UKP more (UK pricing). If the US pricing is as claimed, then I guess it's down to how much one cares about power/noise.
  • xfrgtr - Tuesday, August 15, 2017 - link

    the 64 does very poorly against the 1080
  • darkfalz - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    Not really. The x70 is usually 75% the performance of the x80. 25% is nothing to baulk at even if the price premium is much more than 25%.

    The 56 is something like 85-90% as fast as the 64 and significantly cheaper.

    It's a shame this GPU arch is essentially DOA. Makes the wait for Volta much longer. Then again my 1080 is still giving me great performance and I'm CPU limited a lot at 1440p.
  • mapesdhs - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    I think you're right, this will give NV more time to refine Volta, it'll sustain 10x0 sales for longer, so we'll have to wait for something better for those who want to move beyond the current 10x0 series.
  • Da W - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    Ryzen, Vega, Infinity fabric. The stage is set for a new fusion. Can't wait to see what their top 4-core + iGPU can do as a streamer box.
  • tipoo - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    It's surprising there still isn't even an APU as powerful as the PS4s GPU yet.
  • Qwertilot - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    They have, alas, no R&D money for that sort of 'side' project.
  • msroadkill612 - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    I hear nothing but good from folks who actually use amdS apuS appropriately. The 7850k was a classic for the money.

    Importantly, they have remained in the apu biz all along, and have the unique skillset to competently execute a new gen apu.

    I wouldnt call mobile ryzen a side project. Its a cornerstone.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now