The New Test Suite

As we mentioned at the beginning of this article, we are introducing a brand new test suite with this review and we are also kicking off the first installment of a multipart series covering multiple aspects of current (and somewhat next) generation gaming performance.

By no means should you take the limited (yet extensive) tests we have here as all you will see from us, but rather something to whet your appetite for what is yet to come. The focus of this review is plain and simple – comparing the basic performance of the latest offerings from ATI and NVIDIA. In the future installments we will cover image quality, CPU scaling and other aspects of performance in greater detail. We will be making notes of noticeable visual differences between ATI and NVIDIA in this article, but a comparison with supporting images will be done in Part II of the series.

As far as the new test suite is concerned, here are the benchmarks that made it in:

AquaMark 3
Command & Conquer Generals: Zero Hour
F1 Challenge ’99-‘02
Final Fantasy XI Benchmark 2
Halo
Homeworld 2
Jedi Knight III: Jedi Academy
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2004
Neverwinter Nights: The Shadows of the Undrentide
Simcity 4
Splinter Cell
Unreal Tournament 2003
X2
Warcraft III: Frozen Throne
Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory

We are working on expanding the suite even further, but for now this is what we have. If you’d like to see more games added please feel free to let us know either by sending an email or even better, leaving a comment through the system at the bottom of the page.

We used ATI’s publicly available Catalyst 3.7 drivers and in order to support the NV38 we used NVIDIA’s forthcoming 52.14 drivers. The 52.14 drivers apparently have issues in two games, neither of which are featured in our test suite (Half Life 2 & Gunmetal).

Our test bed was configured as follows:

2.8GHz Intel Processor Prescott
512MB DDR400
Intel 875P Motherboard

The Radeon 9600XT & NV38 Aquamark 3
Comments Locked

263 Comments

View All Comments

  • Anonymous User - Wednesday, October 1, 2003 - link


    Cheatonators are NOT USING True Trilinear filtering in EVERY DX game.

    WAKE UP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    who cares about Nvidia anymore.....
  • Anonymous User - Wednesday, October 1, 2003 - link

    Why not stating if these games are rather OpenGL, DirectX 8 or DirectX 9 Games...
    Looks Like Nvidia is ahead in OpenGl games (Homeworld 2 and Never Winter Nights for example). And ATI in Direct X Games...
  • Anonymous User - Wednesday, October 1, 2003 - link

    WOW, look at all those DX9 benchmarks!!!!!!

    LOL

    He is using drivers that are NOT available to the public(51.75), there are no IQ test(yet) and he has already come to a conclusion.

    Bye bye Anand you are over for me!!!!
  • Anonymous User - Wednesday, October 1, 2003 - link

    Cheatonators 5x.xx are used in this review!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    REDICOULOUS as ANAnD
  • Anonymous User - Wednesday, October 1, 2003 - link

    ANAND + NVIDIA = this review of shit.PERIOD
  • ianmills - Wednesday, October 1, 2003 - link

    I've lost my faith in you as an impartial reviewer.

    The idea to do all tests at 1024x768 was just PLAIN STUPID.
    The difference between the cards is way higher at higher resolutions... The results are much different at the other sites
    Reading this interview one could conclude that the 9800xt is only 20-30% faster than the 9600pro
    This is crap Anandtech. Either shape up or you've lost another reader.
  • Anonymous User - Wednesday, October 1, 2003 - link

    I would Like To see widely played Driving games like Need For Speed Hot Pursuit 2,4X4 Evo 2
    not that driving Anadtech Put in.I Request Anadtech to atleast include Need for speed Hot Pursuit 2.
  • Jeff7181 - Wednesday, October 1, 2003 - link

    #121...

    Quake 3 is used because it's CPU limited, not limited by video cards... so if a new CPU can run the game faster, that's an indiciation of it's performance... new games like HL2 and Doom3 tend to be more video card dependant than CPU dependant.
  • Anonymous User - Wednesday, October 1, 2003 - link

    lock on:modern air combat
    call of duty
    NASCAR Thunder 2004
    Need for speed:HP

  • Anonymous User - Wednesday, October 1, 2003 - link

    I think it is becoming clear that ATI cards are superior in DX9 games, and are the way to go. Sad for us Geforce owners. Hopefully though, Nvidia will address this and come to market with their next gen cards (not this new batch...the next) having a lot better DX9 performance--for the entire DX9 spec.

    If I were buying a card now, it'd be an ATI....but I don't think Nvidia is going to sit still, their new cards will be competitive.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now