Searching for the Memory Holy Grail - Part 2
by Wesley Fink on August 26, 2003 11:11 PM EST- Posted in
- Memory
OCZ 4000 Copper
Click the image to view a larger picture.
OCZ 4000 was supplied with copper-colored heatspreaders. OCZ names their memory by the heatspreader color, so we have names like OCZ 3700 Gold, 3500 Platinum, and 4000 Copper. Since the Platinum name is usually reserved for the lowest latency modules, we can hope that we’ll be seeing a low-latency DDR500 some time in the future. The 512 MB modules were supplied in a Dual-Channel kit. Like Geil, OCZ uses chip blanks, which are labeled with the OCZ ID and speed rating. OCZ has confirmed that Hynix blanks are used in producing OCZ 4000.
We do not know exactly how OCZ achieved such incredible overclocking with their PC4000 memory, but we were able to attain an overclock of DDR552 in our testing. At lower speeds, the performance of OCZ 4000 is very comparable to Corsair and Geil, which also use Hynix chips in their modules. We did a quick scan of other reviews of OCZ 4000 to see if our results were in-line, and we found others who were also finding high overclocks in the same range with OCZ 4000. This is the first memory that we have tested that passes 1100FSB.
| OCZ 4000 Copper — 2 x 512 MB Double-Bank | |||||
| Speed | Memory Timings & Voltage | Quake3 fps |
Sandra UNBuffered | Sandra Standard Buffered | Super PI 2M places (time in sec) |
| 400DDR 800FSB |
2.5-3-4-5 2.55V |
319.67 | INT 2620 FLT 2657 |
INT 4701 FLT 4742 |
132 |
| 500DDR 1000FSB |
2.5-3-4-6 2.65V |
400.10 | INT 3282 FLT 3324 |
INT 5965 FLT 5934 |
106 |
| 552DDR 1104FSB |
3-4-4-8 2.85V |
435.27 | INT 3513 FLT 3617 |
INT 6468 FLT 6505 |
97 |
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
77 Comments
View All Comments
Anonymous User - Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - link
#12: You are completely wrong. OCZ IS A PAID ADVERTISER. You should follow your own advice and look more carefully at the sponsored links.Anonymous User - Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - link
it has been going downhill for a longtime. fewer updates,less contentAnonymous User - Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - link
I totally agree with #14. Anandtech is just going down hill. It's funny how even though you say OCZ isn't any sort of advertiser that it's name is plastered all over the site and you always proclaim it better.You are pleasing the people that your advertisers are pimping. Simple economics. Please the folks that are advertising the product because you are giving it such high ratings.
Only blind people can't see what's going on. Business is business. I bet if you gave Corsair the high honor's then these so called Atacom people would be promoting Corsair.
Anonymous User - Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - link
"We asked major memory manufacturers to supply DDR500 or the fastest memory that they had available for comparison in our High-Speed memory roundup."That is rather disappointing. The incentive for manufacturers to cherry-pick modules for review on a site as influential as Anandtech is simply to great to be ignored.
Otherwise, a very nicely done review.
Icewind - Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - link
Meh, my 3700 Corsair is doing plenty well for me. Rather spend the money on a 5900 Ultra that will make more of a difference in my systemKristopherKubicki - Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - link
#11: OCZ is not a paid advertiser. If you pay attention to those links, you'll see its companies like ATACOM, Newegg, and SVC promoting OCZ memory. If you do not feel comfortable with OCZ, then I would suggest not using those merchants.Kristopher
Anonymous User - Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - link
What do you know... Another of their "PAID ADVERTISER" wins out again! This site has become nothing but pimping their fricken advertisers. Who believes the spew that has come from this site lately? Ever since the OBVIOUS BS review of the GeForce FX 5900. This site lost all credibility.Whoa! What do you know... "Sponsored Links (Get Listed)... And look whose down there. OCZ... Blah! This site is nothing about padding the pockets.
Anonymous User - Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - link
^^^ huh?Anyway, great review Wes, you rock!
Anonymous User - Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - link
oh bleh.. all of a sudden i feel... not coolWesley Fink - Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - link
4 chips per side is single-bank memory. It behaves like single-sided.