Battlefield 4

One of the older games in our benchmark suite, DICE’s Battlefield 4 remains a staple of MP gaming. Even at its age, Battlefield 4 remained a challenging game in its own right, as very few mass market MP shooters push the envelope on graphics quality right now. As these benchmarks are from single player mode, based on our experiences our rule of thumb here is that multiplayer framerates will dip to half our single player framerates, which means a card needs to be able to average at least 60fps if it’s to be able to hold up in multiplayer.

Battlefield 4 - 3840x2160 - Ultra Quality (0x MSAA)

Battlefield 4 - 2560x1440 - Ultra Quality

When we designed this test suite last year, we opted to go without MSAA at 4K given its very high cost on the Frostbite engine. However with the GTX 1080 Ti, the card is fast enough that it is still going to hit smooth 60fps framerates even with MSAA. With a 33% performance lead over the GTX 1080 and a 74% performance lead over the GTX 980 Ti, you can in fact finally have it all with Battlefield 4, even at 4K.

Ashes of the Singularity Crysis 3
Comments Locked

161 Comments

View All Comments

  • ryvoth - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Solid card release from NVIDIA too bad our costs in Canada suck due to the dollar.
  • mapesdhs - Saturday, March 11, 2017 - link

    Ditto the UK. Sites keep mentioning an RRP of $700, but in the UK it's the equivalent of more like $900+.
  • Meteor2 - Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - link

    Don't forget the US doesn't have VAT. Or a NHS.
  • Mr Perfect - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Wait, so Pascal is going to have a two year lifecycle as-is? There won't be a refinement cycle like Fermi to Kepler? That's a little disappointing.
  • Ryan Smith - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Fermi technically had a 2-year lifecycle. The only reason it was special is because the original silicon had issues, and NV opted to fix it.

    There are still yearly product refreshes, but GPUs are too expensive to develop (and the underlying manufacturing process too slow to advance) to do top-to-bottom new GPUs every single year.
  • supcaj - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Disappointed to STILL not see ANY VR-related benchmarks in the suite. VR rendering has unique rendering requirements, and a huge margin of gamers have moved or are planning to move to VR during the lifetime of this card.
  • r3loaded - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Hey, 'member when top-tier GPUs costed $499? I 'member!
  • eddman - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    http://i.imgur.com/pGKlskP.png
  • Mr Perfect - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    I'd love to see how that compares father back, adjusted for inflation. My rose tinted goggles have me remembering top-tier GPUs launching for $400 or less back in the early 2000s, but who knows how that compares to 2017 dollars.
  • eddman - Friday, March 10, 2017 - link

    http://i.imgur.com/OU6612c.png

    There are a lot of inflation calculators online. Like this: https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm

    A geforce 2 ultra was $705 in 2017 dollars!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now