The Intel Core i7-7700K (91W) Review: The New Out-of-the-box Performance Champion
by Ian Cutress on January 3, 2017 12:02 PM ESTTotal War: Attila
The Total War franchise moves on to Attila, another The Creative Assembly development, and is a stand-alone strategy title set in 395AD where the main story line lets the gamer take control of the leader of the Huns in order to conquer parts of the world. Graphically the game can render hundreds/thousands of units on screen at once, all with their individual actions and can put some of the big cards to task.
For low end graphics, we test at 720p with performance settings, recording the average frame rate. With mid and high range graphics, we test at 1080p with the quality setting. In both circumstances, unlimited video memory is enabled and the in-game scripted benchmark is used.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
125 Comments
View All Comments
lopri - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link
+1. (minus AMD part. I will believe that one when I see it)Same performance, and even less overclocking (% wise) for bragging rights. Haha.
Michael Bay - Saturday, January 14, 2017 - link
I`m on Ivy Bridge/980 and have exactly zero incentive to upgrade performance-wise. Ten less seconds in winrar hardly matter.fanofanand - Thursday, January 26, 2017 - link
It's not processor performance that prompts today's upgrade, it's i/o.DigitalFreak - Tuesday, January 3, 2017 - link
If I could slap my i7-3770k in a Z270 motherboard I'd do it in a heartbeat. That proc is fine for what I need, but I need an upgrade to the rest of the subsystems. USB 3.1, more SATA III ports, M.2, etc.Lolimaster - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link
You can do that with pci expansion cards.Alexvrb - Tuesday, January 3, 2017 - link
So I was looking at the i3-7350K and wondering how well it would overclock without major voltage increases... but then I looked at the price. Cripes, that's no budget overclocker. If you're building a mid-range box and plunking down around $160 for the CPU alone, I figure what's another $60 for the i5-7600K. Or if cash is really tight, just spend a mere $20 more and get the i5-7500. Even at bone stock settings, the two extra physical cores are going to provide a LOT of extra performance in a modern application that can actually use 4 threads.dakishimesan - Tuesday, January 3, 2017 - link
Agree. Same thought process I went through. In fact, the i5 7400 is only 13 dollars more than the i3-k.Lolimaster - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link
With cpu's around 4Ghz, there's no point in OC. It's not the same when we had bottlenecked systems using single or dual cores with sub 2.6Ghz that could OC to 3.5Ghz, the extra % of oc vs heat/power consumption reached the diminishing point.2cores for gaming is pathetic.
hapkiman - Tuesday, January 3, 2017 - link
Looks like you better have some real good cooling with this proc. Going to get hot real fast once you start pushing it. Wonder what Intel used for thermal interface material. It's definitely not soldered.ruiner5000 - Tuesday, January 3, 2017 - link
No Battlefield, no Doom? What is this?