Total War: Attila

The Total War franchise moves on to Attila, another The Creative Assembly development, and is a stand-alone strategy title set in 395AD where the main story line lets the gamer take control of the leader of the Huns in order to conquer parts of the world. Graphically the game can render hundreds/thousands of units on screen at once, all with their individual actions and can put some of the big cards to task.

For low end graphics, we test at 720p with performance settings, recording the average frame rate. With mid and high range graphics, we test at 1080p with the quality setting. In both circumstances, unlimited video memory is enabled and the in-game scripted benchmark is used.

Total War: Attila on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560)Total War: Attila on MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380)Total War: Attila on MSI GTX 770 Lightning 2GB ($245)Total War: Attila on MSI R9 285 Gaming 2GB ($240)Total War: Attila on ASUS R7 240 DDR3 2GB ($70)

Gaming: Alien Isolation Gaming: Grand Theft Auto V
Comments Locked

125 Comments

View All Comments

  • 137ben - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link

    Excellent review. This is why I love AnandTech.
  • Thatguy97 - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link

    Best joke of the day
  • Ratman6161 - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link

    When you get around to a full blown overclocking test/review, I'm really hoping you will include the i3-7350K and not just the i7. Back in the day, it was all about buying a cheap CPU and making it perform like a more expensive one. Buying a top of the line i7 only to get a few hundred Mhz kind of takes the fun out of it.
  • negusp - Thursday, January 5, 2017 - link

    But the 7350k is an absolutely horrid CPU to test, when you can pick up an i5 for $15 more.

    We saw this with the G3528- 2 cores makes gaming absolutely shit.
  • evilpaul666 - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link

    Do the new Kaby Lake chips turbo on all cores to their max turbo speed? I've seen that reported one or two places.
  • pavag - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link

    Still on the same league than a decade old processor.
  • AnnonymousCoward - Thursday, January 5, 2017 - link

    1. The 2600K is only 5 years old.
    2. The 7700K is 50% faster.
  • silverblue - Thursday, January 5, 2017 - link

    There is a 20% clock difference between the two, sure, but it's a fair point.
  • fanofanand - Thursday, January 26, 2017 - link

    That isn't even close to being true. A decade ago the Q6600 was the new quad core chip, and the 7700K blows that out of the water. Unless you mean beer leagues and major leagues are both the same because they have the word league in them.
  • Vazilious - Saturday, January 7, 2017 - link

    Why test a new CPU (an officially oc'ed skylake with a few more features) on years old hardware and software? R9 290x instead of an RX 480 and GTX 980 instead of a GTX 1080? Also why use windows 7? An OS where new CPUs are not supported.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now