Test setup

Professional testing requires the emulation of real-world situations but with repeatable results; thus, a perfectly controllable test setup and environment are required, especially for comparable results. Testing the thermal performance of any case with a typical real-world setup technically limits the comparability of the results to this setup alone, as an active system interacts with its environment and the change of a single component would alter myriads of variables. As such, we developed synthetic loads that emulate the thermal output of real systems, which however are passive, steady and quantifiable. As such, the thermal testing now displays the thermal capabilities of the case alone, as if it would have to deal with the entire thermal load by itself, regardless of the system that would be installed inside it. Laboratory data loggers are being used to monitor the PT100 sensors and control the safety relays, which are fully accessible via our custom software. Three such loads have been developed; the ATX version simulates a 200W CPU, 50W VRM, 30W RAM and 4 × 120W GPU card thermal load. Finally, three 3.5" HDD dummy loads have also been created, with each of them converting 30 W of electrical power to thermal, bringing the total thermal load of the ATX test setup up to 850 Watts. As such, the thermal load is immense and only the best of cases will be able to handle it for more than a few minutes, we are also performing a test with a thermal load of 400W, with all of the aforementioned components except the HDD drives at about 42% power, which is more suitable for the majority of cases.

Thermal testing has been performed with all of the case's stock fan operating at maximum speed. Noise testing has been performed with a background noise level of 30.4dB(A). Advanced noise testing is also being performed, in order to assess the ability of the case to dampen the noise of the components installed inside it. This includes the installation of two noise-generating sources (strong fans) inside the case, one positioned approximately over the first expansion slot and one over the CPU area, which generate ≈ 44.2 dB(A) when unobstructed. During the advanced noise test, all stock cooling options of the case are entirely disabled.

Results and discussion

Although the stock thermal performance of the Be Quiet! Silent Base 600 is acceptable, it is definitely not going to break any records. With the primary focus of the designer being to deliver a cost-effective product that can effectively insulate the system's noise, the thermal performance took a significant hit. The installation of insulative material further reduced the heat transfer potential of the case and the stock cooling fans were meant to be quiet, not powerful.

In summary, the thermal performance of the Silent Base 600 is about equal to that of the In Win 303; a case with no stock cooling fans at all. It falls behind nearly ever equally sized case that we have tested to this date, with the sole exception of the low-cost BitFenix Neos, a case that failed to complete our tests but costs less than half as much as the Silent Base 600.

As expected, the stock cooling fans of the Silent Base 600 are borderline audible when they are running at their maximum speed. Only a very low tone, aerodynamic humming noise emanated from the case when the stock fans are running at their maximum speed. Reducing the speed of the fans virtually kills their noise output.

The overall design of the Silent Base 600 and the installation of sound dampening material at the panels of the case may have a negative impact on its thermal performance, but the noise insulation is excellent. The Silent Base 600 reduced the noise output of our dummy testing system by 5.7 dB(A), one of the highest figures that we have ever seen. Note that this is the version with the acrylic left side panel; the version with the insulated panel should improve noise insulation, even if only marginally.

The Interior of the Be Quiet! Silent Base 600 Final Words & Conclusion
Comments Locked

24 Comments

View All Comments

  • Pariah - Monday, November 21, 2016 - link

    That's the most recent video card they have done a full review of. No time for video card reviews when a new ssd or cell phone no one cares about is released every week.
  • arizzek - Monday, November 21, 2016 - link

    I think in this coumputer is only Radeon HD 5770

    http://american-truck-crack.website/
  • Thrawn - Thursday, November 17, 2016 - link

    Looks like a nice case in a few ways especially of course for those that demand quiet.
    Is there some reason I am not aware of that none of the high end cases that get reviewed ever seem to have the new USB-C ports? Not really a complaint about this case specifically so much as of the industry in general. I figure if I get a case I want to use it for a very long time since it doesn't exactly die of old age like a lot of components so I want it to support new connection standards at least a little.
  • DanNeely - Thursday, November 17, 2016 - link

    Chicken and egg lag. Made worse by the same phenomena meaning that most cases only have 2 USB3 front panel ports and the mobos only have a single 3.0 header. And unfortunately, until the USB audio people sort out their problems with USB3 people with headsets are going to maintain a demand for 2.0 ports on the front.
  • eek2121 - Thursday, November 17, 2016 - link

    It's not just audio, some memory card readers have issues as well. I also own a keyboard that doesn't work.
  • Timur Born - Sunday, November 20, 2016 - link

    USB audio issues are mostly happening with non Intel based USB 3.0 ports (Asmedia), though, plus flaky cabling for those front case ports.
  • rocky12345 - Thursday, November 17, 2016 - link

    Very nice looking case for sure. Yes the flat front look has grown on me and I like it that they have tried to keep everyone happy by including 5.25 bays and 3.5 drive cages in a world that hates them. I would for sure tell a friend to get one if they wanted something quiet and look fairly good as well. Oh was nice to see they did not in close the power supply area as well.
  • ThaneDE - Thursday, November 17, 2016 - link

    "They currently have two different cases, the Silent Base 600 and the Silent Base 800"

    That statement is not true anymore - BeQuiet has recently released their 3rd case, the Dark Base 900, a very modable full-tower. See here: http://www.bequiet.com/de/case/699
  • mobutu - Friday, November 18, 2016 - link

    "Noise testing has been performed with a background noise level of 30.4dB(A)."

    I wonder how you'll test those cases that are (default or undervolted) below your background noise.
    And there are.
    So far it seems that you only had just turbine cases as samples ;)
  • E.Fyll - Monday, November 21, 2016 - link

    That is actually a misconception. You cannot have anything producing noise "below" your background noise. Sound energy is cumulative, meaning that every additional noise source is being logarithmically added to the whole. If something is producing even 0.1 dB(A), this will be logarithmically added to the base background noise of the room.

    That is how laboratory testing works. The instrumentation reads the base sound energy within the chamber, the sound energy that the tested sample produces, and then mathematically calculates the sound pressure of the tested sample assuming a baseline sound pressure of 0 dB(A). Although laboratories do have mechanically isolated rooms for such testing, the sound pressure in the chamber is never truly 0 dB; it is the equipment that has been tuned to take 0 dB as the calculation reference. You cannot truly have 0 dB anywhere in nature except in the void of space.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now