Final Words

The OnePlus 3 was certainly the best Android phone at the $400 price point, and it arguably had the best value for your money of any smartphone in general. The OnePlus 3T is a successor to the OnePlus 3, being better in some ways and equally good in all others. Normally that would make it a natural replacement for the OnePlus 3, and OnePlus seems to think so as they've discontinued the OnePlus 3 and replaced it with the 3T. However, these upgrades do not come for free, and the price of the phone has increased by a significant amount to accommodate the upgrades.

For the components that are shared between the OnePlus 3 and OnePlus 3T, the experience and level of quality provided are equivalent between the two. The build quality is just as good, with the only change being the removal of the silver color and the introduction of gunmetal grey and gold finishes in its place. The display is essentially the same, although in my case I did see an even higher level of accuracy in the sRGB mode than I did on the OnePlus 3T, but it's impossible to say whether this is true of all units or if mine was just exceptionally good. The rear-facing camera quality is unchanged, although OnePlus advertises improved EIS during video recording. This is something that could easily be brought to the OnePlus 3 in a software update, so I'm unsure if it's really something that can be considered an advantage of the 3T. I also feel that the poor video quality on Snapdragon 820 devices means that it's not even worth discussing which ones have slightly better video quality than others.

The three aspects that have changed are the battery, the SoC, and the front-facing camera. For the battery the improvement is fairly obvious, with the 13% increase in capacity essentially giving you a corresponding 13% increase in battery life. Moving the SoC from MSM8996 to MSM8996 Pro makes the phone roughly 10% faster for CPU-bound tasks and 5% faster for GPU-bound tasks. These are fairly modest improvements, but it's important to also note that this is a high level perspective that doesn't take into account improvements in efficiency and fixes for errata that have been bundled into Snapdragon 821. Finally, you have the new front-facing camera which moves from an 8MP Sony sensor with 1.4µm pixels to a 16MP Samsung sensor with 1.0µm pixels.

With all these upgrades comes an increase in price from $399 to $439 in the United States, with corresponding increases in other currencies. $40 doesn't sound like an enormous amount of money on its own, but when a phone is initially priced at $399 it represents a price increase of 10%, which is not insignificant. The question is whether the improvements made in the OnePlus 3T are worth this 10% increase in price. This really comes down to the user and what they value in a device. For example, I didn't really touch on the front-facing camera because I think increasing the price of a phone to inflate the pixel count on the front-camera is not a good decision. I find myself asking how much cheaper the phone would be if it had retained the perfectly adequate 8MP camera from the OnePlus 3. The same is true for the SoC; Snapdragon 821 doesn't provide enough of an improvement in performance to justify increasing the price of the phone. The only change that actually does impact the user in a visible and meaningful way is the improved battery life.

All of that being said, I don't think the OnePlus 3T provides a poor value for the money. What's really in question here is whether the OnePlus 3 provided better value for its price. As I've used the phone and thought about the price I've been leaning toward that conclusion, as neither the SoC change nor the new front camera have meaningfully improved my experience, and the 13% larger battery is not worth $40 on its own. If you truly value having the best SoC and having more pixels in your selfies then the improvements may be worth a 10% increase in price for you, but for me I think it just pushes the price closer to the realm of flagship devices without much to show for it.

Ultimately, I still believe that the OnePlus 3T is a very good phone for the price, and it is a better phone than the OnePlus 3. However, if you were to offer me the OnePlus 3 and 3T at their original prices, I think I would just opt to get the OnePlus 3. I would definitely miss the longer battery life, but for me personally, the other changes don't add up to enough to justify the increase in price.

Software: OxygenOS 3.5.1
Comments Locked

104 Comments

View All Comments

  • jaspreet - Tuesday, November 29, 2016 - link

    My office collegue got a pixel xl and has been showing off as to how good it is . I will be sending him this article which clearly shows that pixel xl is a much much poorer phone than a almost half priced One Plus 3T . Time to shut him up :)
  • amdwilliam1985 - Tuesday, November 29, 2016 - link

    Yeah, for some reason Pixel XL does poorer on benchmarks, but in real life(where it actually matters) Pixel XL rules. Too bad we can't read about UI/UX in reviews, you have to use the phone to actually get/know the experience.
  • jaspreet - Tuesday, November 29, 2016 - link

    Not sure what you mean , but real life and all are up in the air things . You need to back it up with numbers to convince people to go for the phone . I dont see anyone sane going for pixel which performs poorly as shown here, compared to the very good one plus 3T as an android phone priced half . To me it is funny that despite being such a poor phone some sites have raved about it which was irritating . I think Anandtech has show Pixel its rightful place ie at the bottom . Well Done.
  • ithehappy - Tuesday, November 29, 2016 - link

    You do realise that the camera is pretty bad on the OP3 right?
  • arayoflight - Tuesday, November 29, 2016 - link

    The read and write speeds are increased due to F2FS file system instead of EXT4. Oneplus 3 with Oxygen OS 3.5.6 posts the same numbers.

    Here are the results from my Oneplus 3 using F2FS instead of EXT4( 1 thread, 4KB random, 256KB seq)

    https://goo.gl/photos/Mm8xjr5pMkwsRJuR8
  • UtilityMax - Tuesday, November 29, 2016 - link

    Oneplus 3T still performs like a flagship killer phone while undercutting everyone else in price. However, I feel like Oneplus no longer offers the killer value it had when it introduced Oneplus One for only 300USD (for 16GB version) two years ago. Sure, the specs have improved since then, but aren't memory storage and cores supposed to get cheaper with time? We see a 50% price hike over the original Oneplus One, and the 3T no longer feels like a steal. It's still has a very good value though.
  • Meteor2 - Tuesday, November 29, 2016 - link

    Why give away your products when you don't have to. Intel found that out with cheap Atoms for tablets. Sad times for us though.
  • Lolimaster - Tuesday, November 29, 2016 - link

    We really need 1440 and 1080p RGB AMOLED.
  • mkhadi1 - Tuesday, November 29, 2016 - link

    Is there a LG V20 review in the works?
  • BenSkywalker - Tuesday, November 29, 2016 - link

    Are you actively trying to lose credibility on your display analysis?

    Why not argue that LCDs have superior contrast to OLEDs- you will find that outside of yourself, it has as much support as your stance on off angle viewing issues. The point is measurable- go ahead, try it. Your dE results will tell you what every other person in the world can easily see- this is *NOT* debatable. For the record- the OnePlusOne becomes washed out to the point of being unreadable before the color shift on the OnePlusThree is close to severe- while still being usable. That isn't hypothetical, they are sitting here side by side.

    You can measure it for yourself. If you find something other then what I am saying it would be groundbreaking and shake up display analysis and observations around the world, so why won't you do it?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now