Final Words

The OnePlus 3 was certainly the best Android phone at the $400 price point, and it arguably had the best value for your money of any smartphone in general. The OnePlus 3T is a successor to the OnePlus 3, being better in some ways and equally good in all others. Normally that would make it a natural replacement for the OnePlus 3, and OnePlus seems to think so as they've discontinued the OnePlus 3 and replaced it with the 3T. However, these upgrades do not come for free, and the price of the phone has increased by a significant amount to accommodate the upgrades.

For the components that are shared between the OnePlus 3 and OnePlus 3T, the experience and level of quality provided are equivalent between the two. The build quality is just as good, with the only change being the removal of the silver color and the introduction of gunmetal grey and gold finishes in its place. The display is essentially the same, although in my case I did see an even higher level of accuracy in the sRGB mode than I did on the OnePlus 3T, but it's impossible to say whether this is true of all units or if mine was just exceptionally good. The rear-facing camera quality is unchanged, although OnePlus advertises improved EIS during video recording. This is something that could easily be brought to the OnePlus 3 in a software update, so I'm unsure if it's really something that can be considered an advantage of the 3T. I also feel that the poor video quality on Snapdragon 820 devices means that it's not even worth discussing which ones have slightly better video quality than others.

The three aspects that have changed are the battery, the SoC, and the front-facing camera. For the battery the improvement is fairly obvious, with the 13% increase in capacity essentially giving you a corresponding 13% increase in battery life. Moving the SoC from MSM8996 to MSM8996 Pro makes the phone roughly 10% faster for CPU-bound tasks and 5% faster for GPU-bound tasks. These are fairly modest improvements, but it's important to also note that this is a high level perspective that doesn't take into account improvements in efficiency and fixes for errata that have been bundled into Snapdragon 821. Finally, you have the new front-facing camera which moves from an 8MP Sony sensor with 1.4µm pixels to a 16MP Samsung sensor with 1.0µm pixels.

With all these upgrades comes an increase in price from $399 to $439 in the United States, with corresponding increases in other currencies. $40 doesn't sound like an enormous amount of money on its own, but when a phone is initially priced at $399 it represents a price increase of 10%, which is not insignificant. The question is whether the improvements made in the OnePlus 3T are worth this 10% increase in price. This really comes down to the user and what they value in a device. For example, I didn't really touch on the front-facing camera because I think increasing the price of a phone to inflate the pixel count on the front-camera is not a good decision. I find myself asking how much cheaper the phone would be if it had retained the perfectly adequate 8MP camera from the OnePlus 3. The same is true for the SoC; Snapdragon 821 doesn't provide enough of an improvement in performance to justify increasing the price of the phone. The only change that actually does impact the user in a visible and meaningful way is the improved battery life.

All of that being said, I don't think the OnePlus 3T provides a poor value for the money. What's really in question here is whether the OnePlus 3 provided better value for its price. As I've used the phone and thought about the price I've been leaning toward that conclusion, as neither the SoC change nor the new front camera have meaningfully improved my experience, and the 13% larger battery is not worth $40 on its own. If you truly value having the best SoC and having more pixels in your selfies then the improvements may be worth a 10% increase in price for you, but for me I think it just pushes the price closer to the realm of flagship devices without much to show for it.

Ultimately, I still believe that the OnePlus 3T is a very good phone for the price, and it is a better phone than the OnePlus 3. However, if you were to offer me the OnePlus 3 and 3T at their original prices, I think I would just opt to get the OnePlus 3. I would definitely miss the longer battery life, but for me personally, the other changes don't add up to enough to justify the increase in price.

Software: OxygenOS 3.5.1
Comments Locked

104 Comments

View All Comments

  • mortimerr - Monday, November 28, 2016 - link

    Very few people, especially here, would voluntarily want to use whatever custom OS ZTE uses on the Axon 7, and even though ZTE is finally giving the appropriate data needed to get sound working with CM, it's still very early nightlies with numerous bugs you'd have to contend with.

    Where it's a completely different world with OP. And that's even if you decide not to use OxygenOS.
  • ToTTenTranz - Monday, November 28, 2016 - link

    And the Axon 7 has a 1440p 5.5" AMOLED screen. And a dedicated DAC for reproducing 24/32bit audio sources, and amplified dual front-facing speakers.
    And it's allegedly one of the first few devices to support Daydream along with the Pixel phones.

    If only ZTE would send review copies to anandtech...
  • bananaforscale - Tuesday, November 29, 2016 - link

    Having a dedicated DAC for 24/32 bit sources is waste. You won't hear the difference and anyway you can simply add zeros to get the maximum word length.
  • rocketman122 - Tuesday, November 29, 2016 - link

    Yep. Id take the zte way before taking this opo 3 terrible. Oneplus support is crap just as much. So pay less and get more
  • bananaforscale - Tuesday, November 29, 2016 - link

    Don't count Beats phones as a value-add unless you have no idea what music should sound like.
  • kubina - Friday, December 2, 2016 - link

    No it's not :)
    The Oneplus 3T is not only best vaue-for-money phone, it's actual best phone on market. 3T is fater than iPhone 7Plus or Pixel XL. Have bigger battery and excellent almost pure OS.
    Only feature where is Pixel (I'm not, if iPhone also) slightly better is Camera. But for this incremental uplift, I'm not willing to give twice more money.
    Especially, Oneplus have better design, is thinner, have much better body-to screen-ratio and is lighter.
    ZTE is typical phone , who looks good on paper, but the User experience is not so good :) Not is about paper specifications :)
  • negusp - Monday, December 5, 2016 - link

    Eh, no. The Axon 7 is cheaper and has all-round better specs, and has official CyanogenMod support.
  • Kepe - Monday, November 28, 2016 - link

    3D Mark Slingshot physics and overall test results between the OnePlus 3 and the OnePlus 3T seem to be flipped.
  • zeeBomb - Monday, November 28, 2016 - link

    Aint that unexpected...OnePlus going for UFS 2.1 and F2Fs out of the box does make a huge difference in real world usage. Does that mean we'll not see much development with the original OP3?

    Here's a video where the iPhone 7 lost to the OP3 in some basic tests: https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=4Z3QV1JMykQ
  • zeeBomb - Monday, November 28, 2016 - link

    I wish this had the updated Sony IMX398 sensor. That would have been amazing. Maybe for the c4 I guess.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now