ASUS X99-E-10G WS Conclusion

As ASUS’ newest high-end desktop motherboard model, the X99-E-10G WS comes out with almost all guns blazing. It is hard to escape how much functionality is present, from a full complement of PCIe lanes (x16/x16/x16/x16) to dual 10G copper Ethernet ports to a full set of DRAM (and support for ECC Registered for Xeons) as well as PCIe storage for either M.2 or U.2 and USB 3.1 ports. Pretty much everything you need, except perhaps Thunderbolt 3, is here.

Ultimately this also pigeon holes the X99-E-10G WS into a highly specific market. Providing all this functionality isn’t cheap with the motherboard having to use two expensive Avago PCIe switches (PLX8747) and Intel’s newest PCIe 3.0 x4 X550-AT2 controller. This squares the motherboard down to users who needed 10G ports but were already lacking PCIe space. The numbers of users who qualify in that margin are set to be very low. Here’s an example of a use case: three GTX 980s with another 10G card (X540, PCIe 2.0 x8) attached in the bottom slot.

For performance, ASUS implements Multi-Core Turbo with the Core i7-5960X which gives our CPU benchmark results in the top half, but due to the PLX chip incurring a ~1% performance penalty, our gaming tests are the lowest we’ve seen for this set of tests on X99. For system benchmarks, the use of extra controllers does add to the POST time, but the audio performance is very good as well as USB 3.0/3.1 (with Turbo) and DPC Latency (one of ASUS’ recent strong points).

The BIOS and software side of the equation is ASUS’ usual consumer fare, and despite the X99-E-10G WS being a workstation focused board, aside from ECC Registered DRAM support with Xeons, there is nothing (nothing on the software side at least) that is specifically derived for workstations or prosumers that isn’t already on consumer platforms. That being said, fan controls, power and USB features are still relevant for most users.

The ASUS X99-E-10G WS does one thing really well – it offers the best single-socket option for integrated 10G support in the current market, and we will hopefully see more down the line (or at lower price points). As mentioned in our 10GBase-T motherboard overview earlier in the year, aside from the ASUS and ASRock boards available, and MSI’s C236 board with a single 10G port, options for integrated solutions are few and far between. Aside from switch pricing the ecosystem for home use, even as a prosumer play, needs to be driven by either switch availability (something like ASUS’ XG-U2008 at $250) or motherboard/PC adoption. So even at $600, the ASUS X99-E-10G WS shows how easy it can be to integrate 10G copper in the form of 10GBase-T.

Other Intel X99 Motherboard Reviews by AnandTech:
Prices Correct at time of each review

$750: The ASRock X99 WS-E 10G Review [link]
$600: The ASUS X99-E-10G WS Review (this review)
$600: The ASRock X99 Extreme11 Review [link]
$500: The ASUS Rampage V Extreme Review [link]
$400: The ASUS X99-Deluxe Review [link]
$340: The GIGABYTE X99-Gaming G1 WiFi Review [link]
$330: The ASRock X99 OC Formula Review [link]
$323: The ASRock X99 WS Review [link]
$310: The GIGABYTE X99-UD7 WiFi Review [link]
$310: The ASUS X99 Sabertooth Review [link]
$300: The GIGABYTE X99-SOC Champion Review [link]
$300: The ASRock X99E-ITX Review [link]
$300: The MSI X99S MPower Review [link]
$275: The ASUS X99-A Review [link]
$241: The MSI X99S SLI PLUS Review [link]

Testing up to 3xGTX 980 and 10G
Comments Locked

63 Comments

View All Comments

  • maglito - Monday, November 7, 2016 - link

    faster large file copies to/from NAS.

    1Gbps is a real limitation here.
  • prisonerX - Monday, November 7, 2016 - link

    Who needs a "use case"?
  • BrokenCrayons - Wednesday, November 9, 2016 - link

    Someone who has a lot of stray use laying around and needs a container in which to store them.
  • Breit - Thursday, November 10, 2016 - link

    Thanks, made my day! :D
  • Notmyusualid - Friday, December 2, 2016 - link

    Hilarious!
  • beginner99 - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    My thought as well. The average user doesn't need it that's why it's not marketed in this space. The average user is content with crappy WiFi that can't even fully use a fast internet connection. 1GBit Ethernet is usually fast enough to saturate your average hdd even for large file transfers
  • bcronce - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    40Gb network cards are becoming popular in datacenters. My use case is a simple one. My ISP is so good, they pass these 40Gb micro-busts through their network right to my connection, giving me transient latency spikes that can last tens of milliseconds before TCP's congestion control starts doing its magic.

    My 1Gb link can't handle 40Gb hitting it and TCP takes too long to respond. TCP takes tens of milliseconds because they're tens of milliseconds away, latency wise. This is a speed of light issue and Latency vs throughput issue.
  • Notmyusualid - Friday, December 2, 2016 - link

    I bought the ASrock version of this board, and by day actually test / implement 10G & higher networks. So given I'm one who is building a rig for the next 3-5yrs (as the article refers too), I thought I'd jump on 10G to futureproof myself. I also have 2x1G ports on the board too, so I can disable the 10G in the meantime.
  • zodiacfml - Monday, November 7, 2016 - link

    Thunderbolt 3 has more value.
    It will get popular soon but price and power consumption has to go down now. The tipping point will be when enterprise Wi-Fi APs start wielding this interface.
  • pixelstuff - Monday, November 7, 2016 - link

    Thunderbolt 3 is harder to run through your walls and put an end on wherever needed. Also not convenient for having multiple users connected at the same time.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now