Battlefield 4

One of the older games in our benchmark suite, DICE’s Battlefield 4 remains a staple of MP gaming. Even at its age, Battlefield 4 remained a challenging game in its own right, as very few mass market MP shooters push the envelope on graphics quality right now. As these benchmarks are from single player mode, based on our experiences our rule of thumb here is that multiplayer framerates will dip to half our single player framerates, which means a card needs to be able to average at least 60fps if it’s to be able to hold up in multiplayer.

Battlefield 4 - 2560x1440 - Ultra Quality

Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 - Ultra Quality

Switching gears to a game that has traditionally favored NVIDIA, the GTX 1060 comes out swinging here. At 60.6fps the card is just fast enough to crack 60fps at 1440p, meaning that even the minimum framerates should stay above 30fps. The ASUS card adds a further 5% here, which still a decent gain, though lower than we’ve seen elsewhere.

Compared to the last-gen GTX 960, this is an above-average game for the GTX 1060, as it improves on its predecessor by 87%, and more still with the even older NVIDIA cards. Meanwhile the performance gap between it and the GTX 1070 is about average, with GTX 1060 delivering 72% of GTX 1070’s performance.

As for RX 480, the GTX 1060 takes its largest performance lead. Overall the card is head of AMD’s 8GB competition by 30-35% depending on the resolution.

Ashes of the Singularity Crysis 3
Comments Locked

189 Comments

View All Comments

  • Samus - Sunday, August 7, 2016 - link

    You are free to go elsewhere. Just about everyone else is content waiting for the most detailed and balanced reviews of products on the Internet. For free no less. 20 years ago you had to pay CR or someone like that for unbiased reviews.
  • close - Tuesday, August 9, 2016 - link

    Then isn't it ironic that you always seem to think that it's all about yours ddriver?
  • snowmyr - Tuesday, August 9, 2016 - link

    compared to your happiness? I mean you seem so upset you replied to your own post all because you misread the statement "We weren't sampled" like it was a complaint instead of just a statement of fact. Entitled people suck balls.
  • DominionSeraph - Friday, August 5, 2016 - link

    Like the GTX 960 review?
  • Morawka - Friday, August 5, 2016 - link

    guru3d is right up there with anandtech on deep dive analysis.
  • damianrobertjones - Saturday, August 6, 2016 - link

    Sire like Engadget will eventually die as sites like The Verge and Engadget thrive. Why? They're shiny, lame, breeze over the details and make people feel great about their purchases. In other words: They're filled with absolute rubbish, paid for articles, which annoys the heck out of me.

    Just look at Tom's Hardware... they might as well shut down.
  • Chaser - Saturday, August 6, 2016 - link

    Really? they've gotten great, indepth reviews out on all the Nvidia Pascal cards much faster than here.
  • Vorl - Monday, August 8, 2016 - link

    That comment only works if they EVER give the reviews. There are cards they have never reviewed... so you don't get your answers no matter how long you wait.... I am not talking specific manufacturers, I am talking whole series of cards like the 960.. and so far the 1070 and 1080... I poke at this a lot because I have been coming here for years, it's even in one of my opening tabs for my browser... but they are starting to lose my faith in their ability to remain relevant.

    I remember when they used to do roundups and such.. haven't seen one of those in quite a while. It's not like the video world is saturated with news all the time and keeping them busy.
  • Ranger1065 - Saturday, August 6, 2016 - link

    I am 100% with you on this ddriver, screw anyone who disagrees. Criticism is needed.
  • Ryan Smith - Sunday, August 7, 2016 - link

    Criticism is more than welcome; it's how we get better.=) I do ask that it be constructive, though.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now