Final Words

LG's strategy with their low-end and mid-range smartphones has been to segment them into products that all focus on a single feature. You have the LG X Style, the LG X Screen, the LG X Mach, the LG X Max, and of course, the LG X Power. I suppose that the thinking behind this strategy is that consumers tend to value one thing in a smartphone more than all the others, and by providing different models that focus on one thing you can hopefully attract the attention of the consumers who care most about that feature.

Unfortunately, I think LG's strategy has really missed the mark. Consumers definitely do value some things more than others in smartphones, but just by looking at LG's smartphones you can see that they sacrifice the quality of other aspects to focus on a single feature. No consumer wants a phone that only does one thing well, they just have priorities about what a phone should do best. In that situation, a phone that tries to provide a good all-around experience is going to win every time, because a smartphone that only does one thing well and fails at everything else is just going to frustrate the user and drive them away from the device.

The LG X Power does live up to its name if you interpret its name as meaning it has a large battery. In our WiFi web test and PCMark's battery test it topped the charts. However, the victory wasn't always by a large margin. Xiaomi's Redmi Note 3 was very close, and it's a phone that does many things well, which contrasts with the LG X Power that really only focuses on providing long battery life. To me this really signifies the failure of LG's strategy. You can build a good all-around smartphone that isn't really much worse than the LG X Power as far as battery life goes, and better in every other respect.

When you set aside battery life, the LG X Power is mediocre at best, and often a lot worse. The camera isn't very good in daylight, although it's better than I expected when shooting in the dark. The display is not pleasing to look at, with a low brightness, dull colors, and a ghastly blue cast. I don't know why the display was even produced, but it never should have shipped on a modern smartphone.

As for performance, it's just completely unacceptable on the North American model. The UI is janky and slow, and the process of opening apps is painful because there's not enough RAM to keep even a modest group of apps resident in memory. It's the only device I've seen where the DiscoMark launch times were barely any faster when launching apps that could and should have been in RAM. General performance within apps is no better, with the jankiness remaining and the SoC being too slow to keep up with tasks like web browsing and general UI navigation. These issues may not be as pronounced on the international model, but the fact that LG is shipping two vastly different models is a huge problem in its own right.

I mentioned this once before, but I don't think the LG X Power even needs its large battery to provide long battery life. The phone's experience is bad enough that users will want to avoid using it, and by virtue of that it will last a long time by being constantly idle in a pocket or a drawer. In that sense, the phone is really a failure at its one key task, because the phone has a giant battery but nothing worth powering.

I never mean to be overly negative in reviews, but in the case of the LG X Power it's really just a case of there being very few positive things to point out. It's a phone that can last a long time, but the user experience is poor and the phone is slow enough that it isn't plesant to use. The display is basically not usable outdoors, and it has a lifeless feeling to it that I didn't think I'd see on a smartphone again. There are just so many better options than the LG X Power in the crowded sub-$200 market, and some of them like the 2015 Moto G are a year old by this point. You simply cannot make a good smartphone by focusing on a single feature, because good smartphones care about every feature.

Camera Performance
Comments Locked

48 Comments

View All Comments

  • KAKAnuran - Wednesday, August 31, 2016 - link

    You don't understand? Money talks here. If anandtech does not receive the check from HTC, they would hold the review until the next generation is coming while no one is paying any attention to the current gen. EVEN THE REVIEWER THINKS THAT HTC 10 IS AN AMAZING PHONE
  • jtang97 - Thursday, September 1, 2016 - link

    Yeah, and people are wondering why the HTC 10 doesn't seem to be selling well.

    Could it be because a very respected website appears to be stalling in publishing their review of the phone?

    In my many years of visiting this site and reading their phone reviews (some of which I agree with and some I don't), I've not seen a phone review delayed for so long. Over 3 months and counting now.

    I think we are entitled to an explanation a bit more than just "life". Whatever it is, it hasn't stopped him releasing other articles and reviews.

    It's almost like you are deliberately delaying the review now.
  • Meteor2 - Thursday, September 1, 2016 - link

    ^This.
  • sprockkets - Wednesday, August 31, 2016 - link

    I saw this phone at cricket. It surprisingly is lightweight. But the screen on it compared to the Escape 3 is horrible. I wouldn't buy it. I basically can confirm the poor light and colors tested here, and you will notice it next to other phones.
  • shadarlo - Wednesday, August 31, 2016 - link

    I wish my S7 or any high end phone would go 1-2mm thicker and make that entire space extra battery capacity. I really really really don't need a phone any thinner than my S7.... what I do need is a full day of USAGE on my phone.

    I have to carry a giant ass battery brick with me just to keep my S7 topped up on trips when I am driving around and going in and out of good coverage zones. I've had my battery drop from 90%-30% just driving around a national park for a few hours. This is the type of thing phone companies need to work on.... stopping massive drains and giving bigger batteries, not making a tiny phone even tinier.
  • Notmyusualid - Wednesday, August 31, 2016 - link

    As I alluded to earlier, check A9 Pro. I go more than a day with ease.
  • fanofanand - Wednesday, August 31, 2016 - link

    A7????? I am a fan of inexpensive phones but this is preposterous.
  • zeeBomb - Wednesday, August 31, 2016 - link

    When a phone like this uses a snap 212...huuuge turnoff. I wonder if it's rootable.

    And Brandon, any foresight of a Moto G play review? Kinda curious how it'll be.
  • zeeBomb - Wednesday, August 31, 2016 - link

    Can anyone who has this (or Brandon) use the AIDA64 app and see what camera sensor it uses?
  • slashbinslashbash - Wednesday, August 31, 2016 - link

    Good idea but poor execution. If this phone had all of its limitations but 2X or 3X the battery life of everything else on the market, it might find its niche. But having all of its limitations and only 1.5X the battery life, why would anybody bother?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now