AMD's Full Teaser Text

On June 01, 2016 at 10 a.m. China Standard Time (3 a.m. BST / 4 a.m. CEST) the Radeon Technologies Group will be announcing:

  • Radeon™ RX 480 set to drive premium VR experiences into the hands of millions of consumers; priced from just $199
  •  First Polaris architecture-based graphics processor to deliver VR capability common in $500 GPUs; expected to accelerate the size of the VR-ready install-base and dramatically increase the pace of VR ecosystem growth
  • RadeonTM RX 480 specifications including:
  AMD Radeon RX 480
TFLOPs (FMA) >5 TFLOPs
Compute Units 36
Memory Bandwidth 256GB/sec
Memory Clock 8Gbps GDDR5
Memory Bus Width 256-bit
VRAM 4GB/8GB
Typical Board Power 150W
VR Premium Yes
AMD FreeSync Yes
DisplayPort 1.3/1.4 HDR

Set to formally launch on June 29th, the Radeon™ RX 480 will deliver the world’s most affordable solution for premium PC VR experiences, including a model that is both HTC™ Vive Ready and Oculus™ Rift™ certified and delivering VR capability common in $500 GPUs.

In a notable market survey, price was a leading barrier to adoption of VR. The $199 SEP for select Radeon™ RX Series GPUs is an integral part of AMD’s strategy to dramatically accelerate VR adoption and unleash the VR software ecosystem. AMD expects that its aggressive pricing will jumpstart the growth of the addressable market for PC VR and accelerate the rate at which VR headsets drop in price:

  • More affordable VR-ready desktops and notebooks: AMD expects that affordable PC VR enabled by Polaris architecture-based graphics cards will drive a wide range of VR-ready desktops and notebooks, providing a catalyst for the expansion of the addressable market to an estimated 100 million consumers over the next 10 years.
  • Making VR accessible to consumers in retail: Thus far, retail has not been a viable channel for VR sales as average system costs exceeding $999 have precluded VR-ready PCs from seeing substantial shelf space. The Radeon™ RX Series graphics cards will enable OEMs to build ideally priced VR-ready desktops and notebooks well suited for the retail PC market.
  • Unleashing VR developers on a larger audience: Adoption of PC VR technologies by mainstream consumers is expected to spur further developer interest across the ecosystem, unleashing new VR applications in education, entertainment, and productivity as developers seek to capitalize on the growing popularity of the medium.
  • Reducing the cost of entry to VR: AMD expects that affordable PC VR enabled by Polaris architecture-based graphics cards will dramatically accelerate the pace of the VR ecosystem, driving greater consumer adoption, further developer interest, and increased production of HMDs, ultimately resulting in a lower cost of entry as prices throughout the VR ecosystem decrease over time.

The Radeon™ RX Series launch represents the first salvo in AMD’s new “Water Drop” strategy aimed at releasing new graphics architectures in high volume segments first to support continued market share growth for Radeon™ GPUs. In May 2016, Mercury Research reported that AMD gained 3.2% market share in discrete GPUs in Q1 2016. The Radeon™ RX Series will address a substantial opportunity in PC gaming: more than 13.8 million PC gamers who spend $100-300 to upgrade their graphics cards, and 84% of competitive and AAA PC gamers. With Polaris architecture-based Radeon™ RX Series graphics cards, AMD intends to redefine the gaming experience in its class, introducing dramatically improved performance and efficiency, support for compelling VR experiences, and incredible features never before possible at these prices.

Supporting Quotes:

“VR is the most eagerly anticipated development in immersive computing ever, and is the realization of AMD’s Cinema 2.0 vision that predicted the convergence of cinematic visuals and interactivity back in 2008,” said Raja Koduri, senior vice president and chief architect, Radeon Technologies Group, AMD. “As we look to fully connect and immerse humanity through VR, cost remains the daylight between VR being the purview of the wealthy, and universal access for everyone. The Radeon™ RX Series is the disruptive technology that adds rocket fuel to the VR inflection point, turning it into a technology with transformational relevance to consumers.”

“The Radeon™ RX series efficiency is driven by major architectural improvements and the industry’s first 14nm FinFET process technology for discrete GPUs, and could mark an important inflection point in the growth of virtual reality,” said Patrick Moorhead, principal analyst, Moor Insights & Strategy. “By lowering the cost of ownership and increasing the VR TAM, Radeon RX Series has the potential to propel VR-ready systems into retail in higher volumes, drive new levels of VR content investment, and even drive down the cost of VR headsets.”

“We congratulate AMD for bringing a premium VR ready GPU to market at a $199 price point,” said Dan O’Brien, vice president of virtual reality, HTC.  “This shows how partners like AMD survey the entire VR ecosystem to bring an innovative Radeon RX Series product to power high end VR systems like the HTC Vive, to the broadest range of consumers.”

AMD Teases Radeon RX 480
Comments Locked

377 Comments

View All Comments

  • digiguy - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    No way this is even close to the 1070, but I am curious to see if this can at least equal the 980 and what the price and performance of the 1060 is going to be. Could be an interesting card for TB3 enclosures, as TB3 would be less of a bottleneck (if at all) compared to a faster 1080 for instance...
  • adamod - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    maybe i am wrong here but my understanding is tb3 runs on a pcie x4 3.0 bus and from what i have seen in testing there is only a 2 or 3 percent difference between x4 and x8 and no difference between x8 and x16 in terms of performance from any graphic cards up until now....i think it was a titan x they had done the testing with but i would have to find the article or video or whatever...my guess is that either 1080/70/60 will run slightly below where it would on a full x1 interface and wont be noticeable in gameplay except for those cases where the game is right at 30fps and losing 3 percent actually will matter.........ill be closely watching this and the 1060 to see if either can do 4k at medium settings reasonably, fingers crossed
  • medi03 - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    According to leaks (the C7) it scores better than 980 in 3dmark (between 980 and Fury non-X in fact)
  • digiguy - Wednesday, June 29, 2016 - link

    Now that the tests are here, we know that 480 is on par with 970 so clearly below 980 and as I said above not even close to 1070. Waiting to see how Nvidia responds with 1060 performance, and what price and, above all, when (as AMD has no competition in this segment for now...)
  • Impulses - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    Not sure I understand the fuzzy logic across some of these comments, people trying to approximate this card to the GTX 1070 or even judge one as the better value...

    AMD themselves have positioned the RX 480 right around the R9 390X. Last time I checked a GTX 1070 is right around a GTX 980 Ti and that was at least as good as 2x R9 290/390 in CF.

    Seems like apples and oranges to me. All this posturing about whether it's smarter to go for the high end or the midrange first is just nonsense, anyone not desperate for an upgrade will simply wait out until both lineups are fully fleshed out.

    I'm very tempted by 2x GTX 1070 to replace my R9 290, but I'm still gonna wait to see what Vega brings because I'm simply not desperate. Similarly if i was looking at the RX 480 I'd wait for the GTX 1060 to launch.

    Nothing worse than kicking yourself because you bought a next gen card too early and the price dropped a couple months later in response to the competition.
  • medi03 - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    980 Ti was NOT "at least as good" as dual 390's, what are you talking about?
  • TheinsanegamerN - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    It certainly was when crossfire didnt work, which was pretty common for new games until the profiles got updated.
  • atlantico - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    980ti "at least as good as dual 390s" when only one 390 is working lol great logic! You're aiming too low, a single 980ti is at least as good as over 9000 Crossfire 390s when only one of them is working.

    lulz
  • Impulses - Friday, June 3, 2016 - link

    Looking thru old reviews 980Ti certainly seems to trade mess blows with CF R9 290, in some games avg fps are lower but the minimum is equal, in some it's better and in others it's worse.

    Dunno, looks pretty close to me, so "at least as good as" may not be entirely accurate (that could be interpreted as slightly better than), but ghee point stands... We're looking at vastly different levels of performance.

    I've got zero interest in fanboy debates, the RX 480 looks great if you're price sensitive and only interested in 1080p gaming... But as an upgrade path from my CF R9 290 it's decidedly uninteresting.

    I'm not someone that's gonna go the opposite extreme and blow over a grand on GPUs either, and like I said, I probably WILL wait for AMD's real next gen flagship before upgrading.

    GTX 1070 SLI looks mighty tempting in the meantime tho...
  • jabber - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    I really don't get the huge excitement for people wanting to look a total dork wearing a VR headset. I just think of that episode of Red Dwarf showing them galloping on a horse... I think watching people use VR will be far more entertaining than those using it.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now