Battery Life

Being plugged into a wall socket makes a mobile phone far less mobile. Because battery life is so crucial to the smartphone experience, we run a series of tests using varied workloads to asses which phones last the longest between charge cycles. To ensure results are comparable, the devices are configured the same and each display is calibrated to 200 nits.

Web Browsing Battery Battery Life 2016 (WiFi)

Web Browsing Battery Battery Life 2016 (LTE)

The Mate 8 and its large 4000mAh battery retains the top position in both of our new Web browsing battery tests. The G5’s performance is best described as average. Despite a slightly smaller battery and larger display, the iPhone 6s Plus lasts noticeably longer than the G5 in both tests.

The Galaxy S7’s larger battery, 3000mAh versus 2800mAh for the G5, and smaller display, 5.1-inch versus 5.3-inch for the G5, help it last 19 minutes longer in the Wi-Fi test; however, the G5’s average platform power (1.47W) is actually a little less than the S7’s (1.51W). It’s also less than the G4’s 1.77W average, although the G4 does have a larger 5.5-inch display.

The G5 does not hold up quite as well in the more variable LTE test. It shuts down 44 minutes earlier than the Galaxy S7 (S820), averaging 1.59W to the S7’s 1.54W. We cannot say for sure why the G5 has a larger power increase than the S7 when switching to LTE, but it’s worth noting that the G5, like the G4 before it, does not take advantage of envelope tracking, which can reduce power consumption by allowing the power amplifier to vary voltage in response to the input signal. The S7 (S820) does use Qualcomm’s QFE3100 envelope tracker IC.

PCMark - Work Battery Life

PCMark - Work Performance Overall

The G5’s battery life when running the real-world workloads in PCMark is again average at best. It performs better and lasts 27% longer than the G4 and finishes close to the Galaxy S7 (S820) in both runtime and performance, but its smallish battery holds it back. The larger 3000mAh batteries in Huawei’s P9 and Xiaomi’s Mi5 help them outlast the G5, even while delivering higher performance.

GFXBench Manhattan 3.1 / Metal Battery Life

GFXBench Manhattan 3.1 / Metal Final Frame Rate

The GFXBench Manhattan 3.1 battery life test focuses specifically on the GPU and is a good indicator of runtime while gaming. It’s pretty typical to see phones last around 3 hours when stressing the GPU, and the G5 is no exception, coming in just shy of 3.5 hours. The Galaxy S7’s larger battery places it just ahead of the G5 in battery life, but both versions of the S7 and the G5 all consume close to 3.1W on average.

We looked at peak performance in the previous section and found the G5 to perform very well. If you plan to play a game for more than a few minutes at a time, however, you need to consider the phone’s performance stability, or its ability to sustain performance over time without thermal throttling limiting the GPU’s clock frequency. The G5 begins throttling after 5 minutes, with a performance decrease of 18%. After about 20 minutes, performance begins to fluctuate until it drops to a fairly steady value after almost 40 minutes. The G5’s steady-state frame rate ends up being about 40% to 50% of its peak performance and very similar to other flagship devices. Because this test is run at the phone’s native resolution, both the Xiaomi Mi5 and iPhone 6s Plus benefit from their lower-resolution 1080p displays.

The G5’s battery life is mediocre and could definitely benefit from a larger battery. It does have one major advantage over its peers, however: a removable battery. Swapping in a second charged battery effectively doubles battery life for less than 60 seconds of downtime.

If you do not have a spare battery handy, the G5 also supports Qualcomm’s Quick Charge 3.0 fast charging technology over its USB Type-C port. QC 3.0 uses a more sophisticated algorithm for adjusting the supply voltage in 200mV increments, from 3.6V to 20V, to improve efficiency and reduce the device’s charge time. It also employs voltage, current, and temperature protection for the battery.

Devices using QC 3.0 over USB Type-C are the source of a minor controversy, because the Type-C specification, which does allow for the use of proprietary charging methods, does not allow chargers to alter the Vbus voltage. QC 3.0 uses the D+/D- data lines for communication and varies the Vbus voltage to minimize charge time. This is in contrast to the approved USB Power Delivery method that negotiates the charging parameters over the Vbus or the CC wire and then charges at a fixed voltage. Is this really a problem? Not as long as the charger and USB cable are certified for QC 3.0.

Charge Time

The G5 pulls 18W at the wall using the supplied charger and cable with the phone on and screen off, which translates to 13.5W max at the battery. Turning the screen on reduces power draw at the wall to 7W. The G5 charges rapidly to about 65% in 30 minutes and to essentially 100% after 75 minutes, after which it begins a period of trickle charging.

Audio Quality

Instead of separate audio codec and amplifier ICs, the G5 uses Qualcomm’s WSA8815 that combines the company’s audio codec and speaker amplifier into a single IC. The G5 is the first device that uses this new chip, and specific details are scarce. It does offer speaker protection from over excursion and over temperature like other amplifiers in this class. The G5 also supports Qualcomm’s aptX HD codec that enables 24-bit audio over Bluetooth when paired with compatible headphones like the LG TONE Platinum.

The G5’s single mono speaker is located on the bottom of the phone, a common position for unibody designs. The G5 does not get as loud as the G4 nor does it sound as clear at high volume levels. Its sound is less unidirectional than the iPhone 6s’, which is a good thing, so cupping a hand around the speaker helps improve sound quality and loudness only a little.

Using the default “Normal” EQ setting in LG’s audio player yields a hollow sound as if listening to music in a large chamber—a poor first impression. Fortunately, making some adjustments to the EQ (which also seems to apply reverb processing) brings out the external speaker’s full potential, characterized by strong vocals and decent bass considering the speaker’s small size. The G5’s aluminum chassis does vibrate quite a bit at moderate to high volume levels. In addition to making the aluminum back feel thin, the extra vibration muddies the overall sound a little. Although it falls behind the iPhone 6s in clarity, I still prefer the G5’s sound over the iPhone’s.

Plugging in a set of headphones and using the default “Normal” EQ setting also produces a disappointing first impression. Just like with the external speaker, music sounds hollow with weak vocals. The built in EQ settings in LG’s audio player all sound equally bad, but manually adjusting the EQ saves the day. Punchy bass, powerful vocals, each instrument and sound distinctly audible—these traits make listening to music on the G5 with a quality pair of headphones a pleasure. Using an iPhone 6s for comparison, there were a couple of tracks where the G5 did not have as much stereo separation between left and right channels. The G5 also does not get as loud as the iPhone 6s. This should not pose a problem when using low impedance headphones, but the G5 will struggle driving less sensitive headphones.

GPU Performance Final Words
Comments Locked

92 Comments

View All Comments

  • LiverpoolFC5903 - Tuesday, June 21, 2016 - link

    Not everyone buys phones as soon as they are launched. A couple of months is not 'old' by any stretch.

    You get the most detailed technical and scientific review out of any website, which is a trade off I am happy to make. Better late than crap is my motto. Amen.
  • Oyeve - Saturday, May 28, 2016 - link

    True. Still waiting for an S7 review and an LGV10 review. Anandtech really lacks the quality it once had.
  • RazrLeaf - Thursday, May 26, 2016 - link

    Whee! (I'll edit this part after I finish reading)

    Aside: Is S7 part 2 done yet?
  • DanNeely - Thursday, May 26, 2016 - link

    Yup. It was actually finished months ago. They're just sitting on it to spite you and to fuel bias conspiracy theories by other commentators. /s
  • theduckofdeath - Thursday, May 26, 2016 - link

    The Galaxy S7 is the blockbuster release of this year. It's getting ridiculous that Anandtech can't prioritise reviews in their pipeline. And seriously, amongst the big brands, there has been half a dozen phones really relevant to review since the Mobile World Congress this winter, and still the full S7 review isn't out.
    Sure, it hurts Anandtech more than it hurts readers, as people will just stop coming here when they notice magazines, delivered by snail mail, produces reviews months before the once great Anandtech.
  • ianmills - Friday, May 27, 2016 - link

    Jokes on you brother as we still can't edit comments on this site lol
  • jjj - Thursday, May 26, 2016 - link

    PCMark is kinda weird. Look at Meizu M1 Metal with Helio X10 (A53@2GHz) http://www.futuremark.com/hardware/mobile/Meizu+m1...
    Web Browsing score 5655
    Video Playback score 2713
    Writing score 7313
    Photo Editing score 6013
    Video score is low, photo editing is in part on GPU so you would expect a lower score but 6k is rather great given the small GPU.
    And then you got web browsing and work , the most relevant scores, at flagship perf somehow.
    I know what it does and how but not sure how relevant it is and if something is off here.

    No storage perf in this review? Would have been interesting to see how storage speeds correlate with DiscoMark results.
    You guys really need to get some SD652/650 and Helio X20 results in the charts, it feels outdated without.
  • xdamm - Thursday, May 26, 2016 - link

    Wow, I immediately noticed the screen was quite shite based on hands-on videos from their event a few months back, but I didn't think production units would have such a crap display as well.

    Shame on you, LG.
  • K_Space - Thursday, May 26, 2016 - link

    Is this a panel issue or can this be sorted out with an firmware update?
  • Matt Humrick - Thursday, May 26, 2016 - link

    The light bleed is a panel issue, but the other problems could be improved with a software update; however, the G4 suffers from many of the same issues and it has yet to receive an update to correct them.

    We've also noticed that firmwares for different regions/carriers are not equivalent; they may use a different white point or disable the auto-dimming behavior in manual brightness mode, for example.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now