AVADirect's Clevo X7200 Redux: AMD 6970M CF Takes the Crownby Dustin Sklavos on June 2, 2011 3:05 AM EST
Re-introducing AVADirect's Clevo X7200
A little over seven months ago, we took at look at a Clevo X7200 courtesy of AVADirect that featured a desktop hex-core processor and a pair of NVIDIA's then-fastest mobile graphics cards, the GeForce GTX 480M. Since then NVIDIA has refreshed their mobile top end, and while we hope to review the GTX 485M in SLI soon, in the meantime we have another pair of mobile parts that have been making waves: the AMD Radeon HD 6970M.
Since our previous review, nothing has changed about the Clevo X7200 whitebook that AVADirect sent us. At its core, it's still an X58-based monster of a notebook, and the review unit we received is essentially comparable to the last one with only minor differences between the two.
|AVADirect Clevo X7200 Gaming Notebook|
Intel Core i7-990X
(6x3.46GHz + HTT, 3.73GHz Turbo, 32nm, 12MB L3, 130W)
|Chipset||Intel X58 + ICH10R|
|Memory||3x4GB Crucial DDR3-1333 (Max 3x4GB for now)|
2x AMD Radeon HD 6970M 2GB GDDR5 in CrossFire
(960 stream processors, 680MHz/3.6GHz core/memory clocks, 256-bit memory bus)
17.3" CCFL Glossy 16:9 1080p (1920x1080)
LG Philips LP173WF1-TLC1
OS: Crucial RealSSD C300 256GB
Data: 500GB Seagate Momentus XT 7200RPM Hybrid
|Optical Drive||6x Blu-ray/8x DVDR Combo (HL-DT-ST CT21N)|
JMicron JMC250 Gigabit Ethernet
Killer Wireless-N 1102 802.11a/b/g/n
Realtek ALC888 HD Audio
Four audio jacks
|Battery||9-Cell, 14.8V, 5300mAh, 78.44Wh|
|Front Side||N/A (Speaker grilles)|
4 x audio jacks
3 x USB 2.0
9-in-1 Flash reader
(Optional HDMI In)
eSATA/USB combo port
2 x USB 3.0
4 x Exhaust Ports
|Operating System||Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit|
|Dimensions||16.5" x 11.3" x 2.22-2.4" (WxDxH)|
98-key keyboard with 10-key
Flash reader (MMC, SD/Mini SD, MS/Duo/Pro/Pro Duo, xD)
1-year standard warranty
2-year and 3-year extended warranties available
Starting at $2118
Price as configured: $4463
Since our previous review, Intel updated their top end processor to the Core i7-990X; it's a minor 133MHz speedbump, but the 990X is still one of the fastest, if not the fastest, processors available today. This is a desktop processor in a "mobile enclosure," running at a nominal 3.46GHz on all six cores and able to turbo up to 3.73GHz. Our review unit this time around is also down a Crucial RealSSD C300, so we'll have to settle for "just one" instead of two in RAID 0.
It's worth noting our display panel in this review unit is actually different than the previous one; the last one had a HannStar panel but this one includes an LG and as you'll see in our screen tests, it's both better and worse.
And of course, there's the reason we're all here: two AMD Radeon HD 6970M GPUs in CrossFire. The 6970M is basically the mobile equivalent of AMD's desktop Radeon HD 6850, with 960 shaders in the old VLIW5 configuration and a 256-bit memory bus. Clocks are much lower, though: the 6970M runs at only 680MHz on the core and 900MHz on the GDDR5 (for an effective 3.6GHz). To compensate for the mobile market, AMD stacks it with 2GB of video memory instead of the 1GB found on desktop cards.
For this review we're going to eschew the usual look at the notebook and its build quality; this is the same shell we reviewed last year, so there's nothing new to say. You can read the previous overview if you have any additional questions.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
bobbyh - Thursday, June 2, 2011 - linkcool laptop.first!
Sufo - Thursday, June 2, 2011 - linkYay, first to reply to first!
tipoo - Thursday, June 2, 2011 - linkI vote that all "first" or similar comments constitute a temporary ban
Shadowmaster625 - Thursday, June 2, 2011 - linkAs long as the first comment doesnt include hawking nik e, jord an, and pr ada it is ok by me.
m.amitava - Saturday, June 4, 2011 - linkYeah..let the kids play! :P
Jamahl - Thursday, June 2, 2011 - linkTo waste your first comment with such a crap one.
mustafaka - Thursday, June 2, 2011 - linkBut it is really cool, so not a complete waste :)
wordsworm - Thursday, June 2, 2011 - linkthe author wrote that AMD took the crown. But then he says for $600 more you might be able to do better? He doesn't know? Well, what is it? Is it the holder of the crown or not? When I see something like that, it looks like the article is not really objective and that it's really just a, as some say, sign of fanboyism.
Will Robinson - Thursday, June 2, 2011 - linkUmm...eew k...in other words,you wanted to see NVDA win ...somehow...never mind.
wordsworm - Thursday, June 2, 2011 - linkI don't care. Shy of becoming very wealthy, I won't ever buy a computer that's more than 2k, or a laptop that's more than 1k. So, it's all out of my ball park. I was just saying that it's misleading and false as well. I am, therefore, more interested in what's going on with Llano than this kind of stuff. I was drawn into reading it because of the misleading title.
If he doesn't know which setup is better, then he should have said so. It's a cheap page-hit trick that I expect from Daily Tech, but not from Anandtech. For some reason, I have very high expectations here. Most of the time, the articles are not like this.
@Creig The author was saying that this setup holds the crown. If he hasn't tested the 485M in SLI, then he shouldn't have said it. More honest would have been, AMD's high end SLI significantly improves on AMD's previous effort.