Silverstone Element ST40EF 400W


The Silverstone Element has been on the market for several years already, and apparently it has been upgraded a few times as the good performance will show on the next page. The package Silverstone put together with the Element is very nice for people who just want the best without compromises. This kind of power supply can only be offered for a certain price, which is the other side of the coin. The Element comes in black like all actively cooled Silverstone power supplies. The rear is nicely perforated for maximum airflow. The front shows several additional longer holes that trapped air exhausts through; that means this warm air will flow back into the chassis but fortunately the exhausted air wasn't very hot while testing.


The Silverstone Element is packed, which we see after opening the housing. There are lots of components and three large heatsinks with fins reaching far over the given space. This power supply is actually heavier than the others, which is due to extra components and larger heatsink volume. We like what Enhance does in its primary sides with the large coil and the little extra care for the rectifier bridge, which usually gets its own heatsink. Teapo makes the primary cap -- an okay choice but there are better options. Teapo also makes the caps in the secondary side and Adda makes the fan.

Silverstone delivers the most extreme cable harnesses with a maximum length of up to 100cm (40"). There are two cable harnesses with a total of six Molex and six SATA connectors. The ATX and PEG connectors have a decent length of 50cm and 55cm.

Seasonic SS-400ET 400W - Performance Silverstone Element ST40EF 400W - Performance
Comments Locked

39 Comments

View All Comments

  • Christoph Katzer - Wednesday, December 31, 2008 - link

    We cannot run after every brand there is and if those companies don't come to us... there are surely many more missing but we can only test products from companies that are actually interested in us testing their stuff. We had an Akasa unit before though...
  • boboko - Sunday, January 4, 2009 - link

    >"We cannot run after every brand there is and if those companies don't come to us..."

    I guess that is the problem with almost all review sites. And the worst thing is not that you skip the smaller guys, but that what you are reviewing is not off the shelf, it's sent to you buy a company that wants a good review. So even if they have rotten quality control, and half their stuff is DOA, you know the one they send you has been triple checked and fine tuned. Not your fault, but to me the reliability is MUCH more important than a few extra watts or a few less decibels, and there's just no way to get good data on that.
  • Griswold - Wednesday, January 7, 2009 - link

    If you read the reviews here, you'd know that this assumption is false in general. AT has had junk on their bench on more than one occassion - if every supplier would do what you claim, all reviews would take place in happy bunny land where everything is dandy and no negative notion is possible. But thats not the case.

    Surely there will be those who go the extra mile to make their product look better than it is off the shelf, but you just cant hide every trace of incompetence and bad quality.

    Much like we cant expect a review site buy every piece of hardware to test it and hope they can re-sell it without a loss.
  • marc1000 - Thursday, January 1, 2009 - link

    wow, I know it was said before, but you guys really do listen to us. that's the reason I come here everyday to know the news! keep up the good job at 2009! regards!
  • C'DaleRider - Wednesday, December 31, 2008 - link

    I'm just curious why the "old" version of the Antec Earthwatts 430 was dug out and retested since Seasonic is no longer the OEM for it but now has Delta as the OEM supplier and has been for many months now.

    Seems it'd be only fitting that the "new" version would be tested instead of a version no longer being made or sold, except as NOS (new old stock).
  • Christoph Katzer - Wednesday, December 31, 2008 - link

    If only "someone" could send it to us :] I will make sure to get new revision on time, you're totally right.
  • sprockkets - Wednesday, December 31, 2008 - link

    What were those bad things happening to the SII Seasonic PS?
  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, December 31, 2008 - link

    I believe Christoph is just saying that he's received an increase number of email messages from people saying that their Seasonic PSUs have failed. It's anecdotal at best, and it could just be a case of more people buying their PSUs and thus a small fraction that fails can still result in more complaints than before.
  • Christoph Katzer - Wednesday, December 31, 2008 - link

    Yes ;)
    There was a revision in the beginning that had problems with certain motherboards somehow, something to do with the "power good" signal. They've upgraded the series long time ago though.
  • Lonyo - Wednesday, December 31, 2008 - link

    I'd just ordered some new parts, including a CX400 about 30 minutes before I saw this article come up.
    Nice to see that my choice seems fairly solid.

    I'm sure this article will be relevant for other people as well.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now