Gaming Performance: iGPU

All of our game testing results, including other resolutions, can be found in our benchmark database: www.anandtech.com/bench. All gaming tests here were run using integrated graphics, with a variation of 720p resolutions and at minimum settings.

We are using DDR5 memory for Alder Lake at the following settings:

  • DDR5-4800(B) CL40

All of AMD's Ryzen APUs were tested with DDR4 memory at the relevant JEDEC specifications of each chip.

Final Fantasy 14

IGP Final Fantasy 14 - 768p Min - Average FPS

World of Tanks

IGP World of Tanks - 768p Min - Average FPS

Borderlands 3

IGP Borderlands 3 - 360p VLow - Average FPS

Far Cry 5

IGP Far Cry 5 - 720p Low - Average FPS

Gears Tactics

IGP Gears Tactics - 720p Low - Average FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

IGP Grand Theft Auto V - 720p Low - Average FPS

Strange Brigade (DirectX 12)

IGP Strange Brigade DX12 - 720p Low - Average FPS

Looking at the performance between Intel's UHD 770 integrated graphics and AMD's Ryzen APUs, it's clear that the APUs perform much better in all of the games that require more intensive graphics. It's worth mentioning that Intel hasn't put as much investment into its die space for the iGPU to be as effective, and Intel is just hitting the bare minimum here for games at lower resolutions.

CPU Benchmark Performance: Legacy and Web Gaming Performance: 1080p
Comments Locked

56 Comments

View All Comments

  • DazFG - Friday, July 29, 2022 - link

    performance per watt for these CPUs is abismall!
  • bug77 - Friday, July 29, 2022 - link

    Which is weird, because high-end CPUs (and GPUs, for that matter) are usually hallmarks of efficiency. Right?

    But yeah, Alder Lake can take so much punishment, your PSU might cave in before the CPU does...
  • techjunkie123 - Friday, July 29, 2022 - link

    Sadly AMD is also headed in this direction with their new CPUs (Zen 4)...... 5.5 GHz and 70% higher TDP for what, 40% or so better MT performance?

    Apples high end CPU and GPU performance scales quite well with power. They just throw a lot more silicon at the problem, but it is effective.
  • tamalero - Sunday, July 31, 2022 - link

    Eyup, this is another Netburst..
  • bennyg - Monday, August 8, 2022 - link

    When you get up to 5ghz, yeah, but OC has always been that way, turbo boost is just factory auto OC
    Down at 80W in mobile the perf per watt looks far better for the 6p8e parts
    It's all Ohm's fault for that law of his
  • blanarahul - Friday, July 29, 2022 - link

    Huh. Makes you wonder how a stock 12900KS would perform under Dry Ice since I doubt any phase change cooler can keep up with the 400 watt heat output.
  • ddhelmet - Friday, July 29, 2022 - link

    Factoria updates per seconds are too low.
  • healbunny - Friday, July 29, 2022 - link

    stock voltage is way too high, please try undervolt. my 12900ks with undervolt able to get P core all core 5.3Ghz, Ecore 4.2Ghz (vcore 1.2v). 2 core boost is 5.6Ghz at 1.3v vcore. All core full load in cinebench r23 consume 240w, cpu package temperature around 80C. Single core consume around 48W, 53C. (using Msi K360 aio). Score for R23, multi 30006 pts, single 2143pts.
  • Oxford Guy - Saturday, July 30, 2022 - link

    You are clearly unfamiliar with their justification for only using JEDEC RAM settings. Undervolting is more complex than picking a vetted XMP profile.
  • Carls Car - Saturday, July 30, 2022 - link

    healbunny didn't mention XPM at all.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now