CPU Performance: Windows 11 vs Windows 10

There are going to be a lot of Windows 11 vs Windows 10 testing over the next few months, based on different CPUs, chipsets, configurations, and even situations where CPUs are replaced and drivers need to be reinstalled to get full performance. Windows 11 is still young, and most of our tests worked (WSL did not, will need to find out why). In this instance both OS installs were fresh and default with all updates and updated drivers. We haven't had time to run our gaming tests, those should come soon.

(1-1) Agisoft Photoscan 1.3, Complex Test(1-2) AppTimer: GIMP 2.10.18(2-1) 3D Particle Movement v2.1 (non-AVX)(2-2) 3D Particle Movement v2.1 (Peak AVX)(2-3) yCruncher 0.78.9506 ST (250m Pi)(2-4) yCruncher 0.78.9506 MT (2.5b Pi)(2-4b) yCruncher 0.78.9506 MT (250m Pi)(2-5) NAMD ApoA1 Simulation(2-6) AI Benchmark 0.1.2 Total(3-1) DigiCortex 1.35 (32k Neuron, 1.8B Synapse)(3-2b) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 129x129, 550 Yr(3-3) Dolphin 5.0 Render Test(3-4c) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 20K Hybrid(4-1) Blender 2.83 Custom Render Test(4-2) Corona 1.3 Benchmark(4-3a) Crysis CPU Render at 320x200 Low(4-5) V-Ray Renderer(4-7a) CineBench R23 Single Thread(4-7b) CineBench R23 Multi-Thread(5-1a) Handbrake 1.3.2, 1080p30 H264 to 480p Discord(5-1b) Handbrake 1.3.2, 1080p30 H264 to 720p YouTube(5-1c) Handbrake 1.3.2, 1080p30 H264 to 4K60 HEVC(5-2a) 7-Zip 1900 Compression(5-2b) 7-Zip 1900 Decompression(5-2c) 7-Zip 1900 Combined Score(5-3) AES Encoding(5-4) WinRAR 5.90 Test, 3477 files, 1.96 GB(7-1) Kraken 1.1 Web Test(7-2) Google Octane 2.0 Web Test(7-3) Speedometer 2.0 Web Test(8-1c) Geekbench 5 Single Thread(8-1d) Geekbench 5 Multi-Thread

Windows 11 has a small effect on some of our Multi-Threaded tests, such as y-cruncher, Speedometer, and AES, but for the most part it's quite minimal.

CPU Benchmark Performance: E-Core CPU Benchmark Performance: DDR5 vs DDR4
Comments Locked

474 Comments

View All Comments

  • MDD1963 - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

    Not sure what statement was actually intended there....
  • jerrylzy - Friday, November 5, 2021 - link

    Even with DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 Intel is only barely competitive with AMD on the high end, and that's pretty sad. Only 12600K is competitive.
  • Spunjji - Friday, November 5, 2021 - link

    PCIe 5.0 is currently useless to consumers and likely to be so for the duration of ADL's life. DDR5 is currently far more expensive and doesn't provide a compelling performance benefit for most users.

    So, yeah - just as Comet Lake was a reasonable alternative to Zen 2 and 3 for many users despite being stuck on PCIe 3.0, so ADL doesn't really make a compelling argument for itself just by having PCIe 5.0.
  • NikosD - Friday, November 5, 2021 - link

    @reviewers

    Any sign of AMX silicon inside P-cores ?

    As another Intel's surprise like AVX-512, I mean.
  • cc2onouui - Friday, November 5, 2021 - link

    Good performance with DDR5 but this review is less than complete (after you started "intel vs AMD ddr4 was not used for the tests) that's odd because DRAM price and MB makes the pick..it's sad that an important review with too much effort (now more than 17000 words)looks only on the shallow.. is windows 10 used for gaming tests or 11 and why ddr4 is out so the not good enough 2080ti
  • 5j3rul3 - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

    Is there any advanced analysis between TSMC N7 and Intel 7?
  • grahaman27 - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

    Both are marketing terms that mean nothing. There.
  • Wrs - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

    But they happen to be surprisingly close. Can't go wrong with one over the other.
  • Spunjji - Friday, November 5, 2021 - link

    They are both marketing terms, yes, but they both refer to actual processes that can be compared.
  • Fataliity - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

    Der8auer had a video at... Kleindeck i think? Where they analyzed the transistors of Intel 10nm vs AMD 7nm processor. Essentially they are almost equal.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now