Video Performance

Now that we've discussed how the HTC 10 does on still images we can go over how well it does for video recording. There have been a lot of cases where a smartphone can take great images but the video quality is often appalling and pretty much an afterthrought. In order to try and see how the HTC 10 does we can start by looking at the kind of encode settings that the HTC 10 uses.

HTC 10 Video Encode Settings
  Video Audio
1080p30 20 Mbps H.264 Baseline 192 Kbps, 48 KHz AAC
24 bit, 96 KHz FLAC
4K30 56 Mbps H.264 High Profile 192 Kbps, 48 KHz AAC
24 bit, 96 KHz FLAC
720p120 24 Mbps H.264 Baseline 192 Kbps, 48 KHz AAC

Right off the bat things are a little concerning here. For some reason HTC is using AVC Baseline for encode in 1080p30 and 1080p60 is absent altogether. I'm not sure why this is but really neither of those things should be the case. 720p120 also uses AVC Baseline which really shouldn't be the case. Interestingly enough, HTC has also included the ability to record video with FLAC audio which results in an mkv file output instead of an mp4 but as far as I can tell nothing else seems to change as far as video encode settings go.

1080p30 Video

In 1080p30 video HTC manages to pull off an interesting trick, which is that their video is actually properly stabilized instead of whatever is going on with the Galaxy S7 and G5. I would say that the color is also a little more accurate from what I saw at the time of recording but without a proper ColorChecker chart I can't really prove this assertion. At this point the HTC 10 and OnePlus 3 both have strange issues with artifacting around the sky that makes me wonder whether the Snapdragon 820 has some sort of issue with the encode blocks leading to such poor quality. Audio quality with FLAC is just clearly superior here though.

4K30 Video

In 4K30 the HTC 10 unfortunately loses the software stabilization so the result is basically just as shaky as the Galaxy S7 and by extension the Note7. Even using AVC High profile I can still see strange artifacts in the sky which is really strange. Audio capture continues to be better as far as suppressing wind noise goes than Galaxy S7, likely due to the use of dual level microphones similar to what we saw in the One M7. I would say color rendition is more accurate here as well but this is a subjective observation. The iPhones 6s continues to be one of the best phones for 4K30 capture almost entirely because it actually has the ISP throughput to process 4K video properly.

Slow Motion Video

In 720p120 the HTC 10 really starts to show its weakness. I suspect we're dealing with some kind of sensor limitation here because 4K30 is possible but for some reason 720p240 isn't. Color rendition is mildly cooler here as well relative to the Galaxy S7 but detail isn't great here and obviously it isn't going to be able to capture motion as well as anything with 240 FPS capture. The iPhone 6s would obviously beat it here by virtue of its 1080p120 capture.

Overall, video capture is somewhat disappointing on the HTC 10. It definitely isn't unusable and the FLAC audio is a compelling addition along with proper 1080p30 video stabilization, but things like poor slow motion capture and some strange artifacting and poor encode profiles mar the experience. Relative to something like the Galaxy S7 I would say that 1080p30 and 4K30 capture are clearly superior, but 720p120 and the utter lack of 1080p60 video means that depending upon what you use the camera for the HTC 10 can end up falling short of the competition. 720p240, 1080p60 for next year as well as AVC High Profile across the board would be great to see and would resolve a lot of the issues here.

Looking at the camera overall, I think the HTC 10 is very much the equal of the Galaxy S7 as far as camera goes. The Galaxy S7 and Note7 have incredible user experience due to the sheer speed of capture and focus, but the image quality, oil painting-esque processing, and somewhat off color rendition in a lot of cases means that the HTC 10 can give you a better result if you can tap to focus properly and possibly adjust the exposure metering. It definitely could use some work to clean up the details and loose ends, but HTC has finally shipped a camera that they can be proud of and lives up to the promise of the marketing and specs.

Still Image Performance Software UX: HTC Sense
Comments Locked

183 Comments

View All Comments

  • kmmatney - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    Sounds like my experience a few years ago. I switched to a "high end" LG phone because I got tired of Apple not having larger screens. I loved it at first, but had a lot of the same issues - keyboard didn't work well, battery life sucked, and other annoying issues. Tried a few different ROMs (everyone seemed to have their favorites that was the "best" one), but that just made things worse - would fix a particular issue, but create several others. Stuck it out for 18 months, and then finally just sold it, took a $50 hit (hey, I'm cheap!), and bought a used iPhone 5 to tide me over for 6 months until next upgrade cycle. I guess it was all "user error" on my part.
  • fanofanand - Tuesday, September 20, 2016 - link

    You are absolutely right, expecting your SOT to match the "call time" numbers is totally normal. /s
  • Morawka - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    if this review is getting this many comments then HTC is doing something right here.
  • StrangerGuy - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    Yeah they doing a great job if market success is solely determined by how much comments the vocal tiny minority generates.

    Oh and BTW I'm sick of hearing trite being called "innovation" at every single corner. That buzzword is so debased to the point of uselessness.
  • JKJK - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    Long time htc fan. Ordered one this weekend + a 200GB SD card.
    Good review, even thought it's a bit late. But finding bugs like wifi and such that MIGHT give it enought focus to make HTC look into it, is worth it. Even tought it has a few sore spots, I suppose it will be a nice upgrade from my M9 either way.
    A friend of mine has one, and one thing I really don't like about it, is that is a bit unergonomic when you have small hands, like I do. And the edge on the back makes it uncomfortable to hold compared to the M9 because of this (edge).
  • JKJK - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    Another weird thing ... It doesn't seem possible to find original norwegian / european charger for the HTC 10. I'm speaking of the Rapid charge / Quick Charge 3.0 with USB Type C. You actually have to buy another phone (!) at this point to get a charger. For now, I'm stuck with the M9's rapid charger / Quick charge 2.0 adapter and a belkin USB C cable. Very frustrating.

    It took almost a year before a Quick Charge 2.0 charger hit the market for the for the M9, and it hit england about 3 months before norway. According to Scandinavian (swedish) support, It's supposed to hit market "within 2016". Not good.
  • Vagabondjonez - Tuesday, September 20, 2016 - link

    thats harsh man. I have so many qc 2 adapters lol
  • fanofanand - Tuesday, September 20, 2016 - link

    Google "Anker" they make fantastic QC 3.0 with Type C bases.
  • JKJK - Tuesday, September 20, 2016 - link

    Yes, but not with norwegian/european plugs?
    However. Found another qualcom certified qc3 chargers with europlug and usbc.
    Compared with some high quality belkin cables with 3A suport and correct resistance, I think I'm gettig there.
    I think it wad Aukey/Auky chargers
  • JKJK - Tuesday, September 20, 2016 - link

    Err.. paired with the belkin cables.
    However. Original htc qc3 charger is said to be coming in sale this year (Htc tc p5000-eu/uk/etc.)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now